磁悬浮平衡系统静态气动测试与验证的支撑方法比较

Cameron Neill
{"title":"磁悬浮平衡系统静态气动测试与验证的支撑方法比较","authors":"Cameron Neill","doi":"10.25777/24MK-BN25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COMPARISON OF SUPPORT METHODS FOR STATIC AERODYNAMIC TESTING AND VALIDATION OF MAGNETIC SUSPENSION AND BALANCE SYSTEM Cameron K. Neill Old Dominion University, 2019 Director: Dr. Colin Britcher Magnetic suspension wind tunnels offer an alternative to traditional physical support methods. They allow for the collection of support interference free data and broader dynamic test capabilities than existing methods. Determination of dynamic aerodynamic characteristics is a crucial portion of the design of new re-entry capsules. A NASA initiative restored the 6-inch Magnetic Suspension and Balance System to support the design of a new MSBS for a supersonic wind tunnel. Before a new MSBS can be constructed, the characteristics of the current MSBS must be examined. This thesis discusses the calibration and validation of the 6-inch MSBS. After calibration, three aerodynamic tests were performed in order to characterize the data collected from the MSBS. They included a traditional sting supported test, a free-flying magnetically suspended test, and a magnetically suspended test with aerodynamic interference from a dummy sting. The ideology behind the chosen experimental design was to isolate the effect of support interference from any MSBS calibration errors. Any differences between the sting supported and the dummy sting tests would be caused by the MSBS. Any differences between the free-flying and the dummy sting tests would be due to support interference. Multiple components were designed and constructed, in order to support this effort. The goals of this thesis were met. The MSBS data had high repeatability and accuracy, which validated the force recovery method. Aerodynamic testing showed in minimal variation between support methods at low angles of attack. Discrepancies between support methods increased with models mounted at high angles of attack. Current references generally exhibit much higher Reynolds numbers than the MSBS and the wind tunnel can achieve. Support interference free reference data in an achievable Reynolds number was generated for future NASA testing. While the outcome was successful, multiple possible improvements or future projects were identified that can be completed prior to design and construction of the new MSBS.","PeriodicalId":22842,"journal":{"name":"Theory of Computing Systems \\/ Mathematical Systems Theory","volume":"25 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Support Methods for Static Aerodynamic Testing and Validation of a Magnetic Suspension and Balance System\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Neill\",\"doi\":\"10.25777/24MK-BN25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COMPARISON OF SUPPORT METHODS FOR STATIC AERODYNAMIC TESTING AND VALIDATION OF MAGNETIC SUSPENSION AND BALANCE SYSTEM Cameron K. Neill Old Dominion University, 2019 Director: Dr. Colin Britcher Magnetic suspension wind tunnels offer an alternative to traditional physical support methods. They allow for the collection of support interference free data and broader dynamic test capabilities than existing methods. Determination of dynamic aerodynamic characteristics is a crucial portion of the design of new re-entry capsules. A NASA initiative restored the 6-inch Magnetic Suspension and Balance System to support the design of a new MSBS for a supersonic wind tunnel. Before a new MSBS can be constructed, the characteristics of the current MSBS must be examined. This thesis discusses the calibration and validation of the 6-inch MSBS. After calibration, three aerodynamic tests were performed in order to characterize the data collected from the MSBS. They included a traditional sting supported test, a free-flying magnetically suspended test, and a magnetically suspended test with aerodynamic interference from a dummy sting. The ideology behind the chosen experimental design was to isolate the effect of support interference from any MSBS calibration errors. Any differences between the sting supported and the dummy sting tests would be caused by the MSBS. Any differences between the free-flying and the dummy sting tests would be due to support interference. Multiple components were designed and constructed, in order to support this effort. The goals of this thesis were met. The MSBS data had high repeatability and accuracy, which validated the force recovery method. Aerodynamic testing showed in minimal variation between support methods at low angles of attack. Discrepancies between support methods increased with models mounted at high angles of attack. Current references generally exhibit much higher Reynolds numbers than the MSBS and the wind tunnel can achieve. Support interference free reference data in an achievable Reynolds number was generated for future NASA testing. While the outcome was successful, multiple possible improvements or future projects were identified that can be completed prior to design and construction of the new MSBS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory of Computing Systems \\\\/ Mathematical Systems Theory\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory of Computing Systems \\\\/ Mathematical Systems Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25777/24MK-BN25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory of Computing Systems \\/ Mathematical Systems Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25777/24MK-BN25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁悬浮和平衡系统静态气动测试和验证的支撑方法比较Cameron K. Neill Old Dominion University, 2019主任:Colin Britcher博士磁悬浮风洞提供了传统物理支撑方法的替代方案。它们允许收集支持无干扰数据和比现有方法更广泛的动态测试功能。动态气动特性的确定是新型返回舱设计的关键部分。美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的一项倡议恢复了6英寸的磁悬浮和平衡系统,以支持为超音速风洞设计新的MSBS。在构建新的MSBS之前,必须检查当前MSBS的特性。本文讨论了6英寸MSBS的校准和验证。校准后,进行了三次气动测试,以表征从MSBS收集的数据。其中包括传统的支撑杆测试、自由飞行的磁悬浮测试和受假杆气动干扰的磁悬浮测试。所选实验设计背后的思想是将支持干扰的影响与任何MSBS校准误差隔离开来。支撑刺痛试验和虚拟刺痛试验之间的任何差异都是由MSBS引起的。自由飞行和假人刺痛试验之间的任何差异都是由于支撑干扰造成的。为了支持这项工作,设计和构建了多个组件。这篇论文的目标达到了。MSBS数据具有较高的重复性和准确性,验证了力恢复方法的有效性。气动测试显示在最小的变化之间的支持方法在低攻角。支持方法之间的差异随着模型安装在大迎角而增加。目前的参考文献通常比MSBS和风洞所能达到的雷诺数高得多。支持无干扰参考数据在一个可实现的雷诺数生成为未来的NASA测试。虽然结果是成功的,但在设计和建造新的MSBS之前,确定了多个可能的改进或未来项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Support Methods for Static Aerodynamic Testing and Validation of a Magnetic Suspension and Balance System
COMPARISON OF SUPPORT METHODS FOR STATIC AERODYNAMIC TESTING AND VALIDATION OF MAGNETIC SUSPENSION AND BALANCE SYSTEM Cameron K. Neill Old Dominion University, 2019 Director: Dr. Colin Britcher Magnetic suspension wind tunnels offer an alternative to traditional physical support methods. They allow for the collection of support interference free data and broader dynamic test capabilities than existing methods. Determination of dynamic aerodynamic characteristics is a crucial portion of the design of new re-entry capsules. A NASA initiative restored the 6-inch Magnetic Suspension and Balance System to support the design of a new MSBS for a supersonic wind tunnel. Before a new MSBS can be constructed, the characteristics of the current MSBS must be examined. This thesis discusses the calibration and validation of the 6-inch MSBS. After calibration, three aerodynamic tests were performed in order to characterize the data collected from the MSBS. They included a traditional sting supported test, a free-flying magnetically suspended test, and a magnetically suspended test with aerodynamic interference from a dummy sting. The ideology behind the chosen experimental design was to isolate the effect of support interference from any MSBS calibration errors. Any differences between the sting supported and the dummy sting tests would be caused by the MSBS. Any differences between the free-flying and the dummy sting tests would be due to support interference. Multiple components were designed and constructed, in order to support this effort. The goals of this thesis were met. The MSBS data had high repeatability and accuracy, which validated the force recovery method. Aerodynamic testing showed in minimal variation between support methods at low angles of attack. Discrepancies between support methods increased with models mounted at high angles of attack. Current references generally exhibit much higher Reynolds numbers than the MSBS and the wind tunnel can achieve. Support interference free reference data in an achievable Reynolds number was generated for future NASA testing. While the outcome was successful, multiple possible improvements or future projects were identified that can be completed prior to design and construction of the new MSBS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trend Significance Levels of Rain Onset and Cessation and Lengths of the Wet and Dry Seasons in Epe, Lagos State, Nigeria Effect of drying method on compressive strength of straw-based thermal insulations CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR SCHOOL INFORMATION WEBSITE Buckling length of reinforced concrete columns in non-sway constructions Static analysis of bond between prestressing strand and UHPC exposed to elevated temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1