Dakshitha Wickramasinghe, N. Wickramasinghe, S. Kamburugamuwa, N. Samarasekera, J. Warusavitarne, C. Vaizey
{"title":"肛门括约肌疲劳评估肛门失禁:系统回顾","authors":"Dakshitha Wickramasinghe, N. Wickramasinghe, S. Kamburugamuwa, N. Samarasekera, J. Warusavitarne, C. Vaizey","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI. This study aimed to perform a systematic review on the difference in sphincter fatigability between patients with and without AI.","PeriodicalId":19104,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology & Motility","volume":"208 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anal sphincter fatigability in assessing anal incontinence: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Dakshitha Wickramasinghe, N. Wickramasinghe, S. Kamburugamuwa, N. Samarasekera, J. Warusavitarne, C. Vaizey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI. This study aimed to perform a systematic review on the difference in sphincter fatigability between patients with and without AI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology & Motility\",\"volume\":\"208 3-4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology & Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology & Motility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anal sphincter fatigability in assessing anal incontinence: A systematic review
Diagnosing anal incontinence (AI) based on manometry results is challenging due to the variation of the normal values and overlap between patients with and without AI. This study aimed to perform a systematic review on the difference in sphincter fatigability between patients with and without AI.