儿童桡骨颈严重移位骨折的经皮 K 线复位和石膏固定。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1097/BPB.0000000000001080
Fuyong Zhang, Tantan Zhao, Ya Liu, Jin Dai, Yao Liu, Wendong Liu, Xiaodong Wang, Yunfang Zhen
{"title":"儿童桡骨颈严重移位骨折的经皮 K 线复位和石膏固定。","authors":"Fuyong Zhang, Tantan Zhao, Ya Liu, Jin Dai, Yao Liu, Wendong Liu, Xiaodong Wang, Yunfang Zhen","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between percutaneous K-wire reduction cast immobilization (PKRC) and percutaneous K-wire reduction elastic intramedullary nailing combined with cast immobilization (PKRNC) for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children. This was a retrospective analysis of 62 radial neck fractures in children treated with PKRC or PKRNC. Thirty-one children were treated with percutaneous K-wire reduction, K-wire removal after reduction, and cast immobilization while 31 radial neck fractures in controls were managed using PKRNC. There were no significant differences between PKRC and PKRNC with regard to preoperative angulation ( P  = 0.556). The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly shorter than that of the PKRNC group ( P  = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the displacement angle when compared between the two groups on the first day and 1 month after surgery ( P  = 0.617, 0.72). The Mayo elbow performance score of the elbow joint function did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P  = 0.587). Although the hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (4.81 ± 1.07 vs. 4.16 ± 1.59 days; P  = 0.067), the PKRNC group required a second hospitalization to remove the elastic intramedullary nail 3 months after the operation. PKRC and PKRNC both achieved satisfactory outcomes for radial neck fractures in children. The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly lower than in the PKRNC group. PKRC does not require reoperation to remove internal fixation. Therefore, PKRC is recommended for radial neck fractures in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"174-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous K-wire reduction and cast immobilization for severely displaced radial neck fractures in children.\",\"authors\":\"Fuyong Zhang, Tantan Zhao, Ya Liu, Jin Dai, Yao Liu, Wendong Liu, Xiaodong Wang, Yunfang Zhen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between percutaneous K-wire reduction cast immobilization (PKRC) and percutaneous K-wire reduction elastic intramedullary nailing combined with cast immobilization (PKRNC) for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children. This was a retrospective analysis of 62 radial neck fractures in children treated with PKRC or PKRNC. Thirty-one children were treated with percutaneous K-wire reduction, K-wire removal after reduction, and cast immobilization while 31 radial neck fractures in controls were managed using PKRNC. There were no significant differences between PKRC and PKRNC with regard to preoperative angulation ( P  = 0.556). The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly shorter than that of the PKRNC group ( P  = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the displacement angle when compared between the two groups on the first day and 1 month after surgery ( P  = 0.617, 0.72). The Mayo elbow performance score of the elbow joint function did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P  = 0.587). Although the hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (4.81 ± 1.07 vs. 4.16 ± 1.59 days; P  = 0.067), the PKRNC group required a second hospitalization to remove the elastic intramedullary nail 3 months after the operation. PKRC and PKRNC both achieved satisfactory outcomes for radial neck fractures in children. The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly lower than in the PKRNC group. PKRC does not require reoperation to remove internal fixation. Therefore, PKRC is recommended for radial neck fractures in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"174-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较经皮K线复位石膏固定术(PKRC)和经皮K线复位弹性髓内钉联合石膏固定术(PKRNC)治疗儿童桡骨颈骨折的疗效。这是一项对62例接受PKRC或PKRNC治疗的儿童桡骨颈骨折的回顾性分析。31名儿童接受了经皮K线复位、复位后取出K线和石膏固定治疗,而31名对照组儿童的桡骨颈骨折则接受了PKRNC治疗。PKRC 和 PKRNC 在术前成角方面没有明显差异(P = 0.556)。PKRC 组的手术时间明显短于 PKRNC 组(P = 0.023)。两组患者术后第一天和一个月的移位角度比较无明显差异(P = 0.617,0.72)。两组肘关节功能的梅奥肘关节表现评分无明显差异(P = 0.587)。虽然两组患者的住院时间无明显差异(4.81 ± 1.07 天 vs. 4.16 ± 1.59 天;P = 0.067),但 PKRNC 组患者在术后 3 个月需要第二次住院,以取出弹性髓内钉。PKRC和PKRNC治疗儿童桡骨颈骨折的疗效均令人满意。PKRC组的手术时间明显少于PKRNC组。PKRC 无需再次手术取出内固定物。因此,推荐使用PKRC治疗儿童桡骨颈骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous K-wire reduction and cast immobilization for severely displaced radial neck fractures in children.

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between percutaneous K-wire reduction cast immobilization (PKRC) and percutaneous K-wire reduction elastic intramedullary nailing combined with cast immobilization (PKRNC) for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children. This was a retrospective analysis of 62 radial neck fractures in children treated with PKRC or PKRNC. Thirty-one children were treated with percutaneous K-wire reduction, K-wire removal after reduction, and cast immobilization while 31 radial neck fractures in controls were managed using PKRNC. There were no significant differences between PKRC and PKRNC with regard to preoperative angulation ( P  = 0.556). The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly shorter than that of the PKRNC group ( P  = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the displacement angle when compared between the two groups on the first day and 1 month after surgery ( P  = 0.617, 0.72). The Mayo elbow performance score of the elbow joint function did not differ significantly between the two groups ( P  = 0.587). Although the hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (4.81 ± 1.07 vs. 4.16 ± 1.59 days; P  = 0.067), the PKRNC group required a second hospitalization to remove the elastic intramedullary nail 3 months after the operation. PKRC and PKRNC both achieved satisfactory outcomes for radial neck fractures in children. The operation time in the PKRC group was significantly lower than in the PKRNC group. PKRC does not require reoperation to remove internal fixation. Therefore, PKRC is recommended for radial neck fractures in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Bending osteotomy through the distal tibial physis for stable reduction of the ankle joint in fibular hemimelia. Update at skeletal maturity. Casting, elastic intramedullary nailing or external fixation in pediatric tibial shaft fractures: which is the most appropriate treatment? A multicenter study. Low osteotomy cut of Dega procedure for older children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction combined with traditional growing rods in severe early-onset scoliosis with neurofibromatosis type 1. The effects of gastrojejunostomy tube placement on pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications following spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1