不同体位对师范生等长举重力量的影响。

J. H. Lin, L. Liaw, S. M. Chen, C. H. Lee
{"title":"不同体位对师范生等长举重力量的影响。","authors":"J. H. Lin, L. Liaw, S. M. Chen, C. H. Lee","doi":"10.6452/KJMS.199512.0678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to describe norms of isometric lifting strength for normal college students and to investigate the effects of gender, body weight, height, and upper and lower limb length on lifting strength. Three types of lifting (i.e., arm, back, and leg lifting) were measured in a sample of 104 college students aged between 18 and 26 years. A Force Evaluation and Testing System (FET 5000) was used for strength measurements with three standard lifting positions. The average of three trials for each lifting strength test was used as the subject's test score. The results showed that the highest mean lifting strength was recorded for leg lifting in both males and females. Both groups also had the lowest score in arm lifting. Of the total sample, there was a difference of strength of nearly three- times between leg and arm lifting. Males were stronger than females in all lifting patterns. In addition, lifting strengths were significantly affected by such variables as sex, weight and height. Body weight was an effective predictor of arm lifting strength, and height an effective predictor of leg lifting strength. Finally, we found that strength in one position had positive relations with strength in other positions. These findings and the establishment of data base can in future provide therapists with an objective evaluation regarding lifting strength of individuals for clinical use.","PeriodicalId":12495,"journal":{"name":"Gaoxiong yi xue ke xue za zhi = The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","volume":"46 2","pages":"678-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of different postures on isometric lifting strength in normal college students.\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Lin, L. Liaw, S. M. Chen, C. H. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.6452/KJMS.199512.0678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to describe norms of isometric lifting strength for normal college students and to investigate the effects of gender, body weight, height, and upper and lower limb length on lifting strength. Three types of lifting (i.e., arm, back, and leg lifting) were measured in a sample of 104 college students aged between 18 and 26 years. A Force Evaluation and Testing System (FET 5000) was used for strength measurements with three standard lifting positions. The average of three trials for each lifting strength test was used as the subject's test score. The results showed that the highest mean lifting strength was recorded for leg lifting in both males and females. Both groups also had the lowest score in arm lifting. Of the total sample, there was a difference of strength of nearly three- times between leg and arm lifting. Males were stronger than females in all lifting patterns. In addition, lifting strengths were significantly affected by such variables as sex, weight and height. Body weight was an effective predictor of arm lifting strength, and height an effective predictor of leg lifting strength. Finally, we found that strength in one position had positive relations with strength in other positions. These findings and the establishment of data base can in future provide therapists with an objective evaluation regarding lifting strength of individuals for clinical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaoxiong yi xue ke xue za zhi = The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"678-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaoxiong yi xue ke xue za zhi = The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6452/KJMS.199512.0678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaoxiong yi xue ke xue za zhi = The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6452/KJMS.199512.0678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨师范生等距举力的指标,并探讨性别、体重、身高、上下肢长度对举力的影响。对104名年龄在18至26岁之间的大学生进行了三种类型的举重(即手臂、背部和腿部举重)测量。力评估和测试系统(FET 5000)用于三个标准升降位置的强度测量。每个举重强度测试的三次试验的平均值作为受试者的测试分数。结果显示,在男性和女性中,腿部举重的平均力量最高。两组在举臂方面的得分也最低。在所有的样本中,抬腿和抬臂之间的力量差异接近三倍。在所有举重模式中,男性均强于女性。此外,举重力量受性别、体重和身高等变量的影响显著。体重是臂举力量的有效预测因子,身高是腿举力量的有效预测因子。最后,我们发现一个位置的强度与其他位置的强度呈正相关。这些发现和数据库的建立可以为治疗师提供客观的评估个体的举重力量,以供临床使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of different postures on isometric lifting strength in normal college students.
The purpose of this study was to describe norms of isometric lifting strength for normal college students and to investigate the effects of gender, body weight, height, and upper and lower limb length on lifting strength. Three types of lifting (i.e., arm, back, and leg lifting) were measured in a sample of 104 college students aged between 18 and 26 years. A Force Evaluation and Testing System (FET 5000) was used for strength measurements with three standard lifting positions. The average of three trials for each lifting strength test was used as the subject's test score. The results showed that the highest mean lifting strength was recorded for leg lifting in both males and females. Both groups also had the lowest score in arm lifting. Of the total sample, there was a difference of strength of nearly three- times between leg and arm lifting. Males were stronger than females in all lifting patterns. In addition, lifting strengths were significantly affected by such variables as sex, weight and height. Body weight was an effective predictor of arm lifting strength, and height an effective predictor of leg lifting strength. Finally, we found that strength in one position had positive relations with strength in other positions. These findings and the establishment of data base can in future provide therapists with an objective evaluation regarding lifting strength of individuals for clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of serum CA15-3 and CEA in breast cancer. Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee: a seven years follow-up study. A clinical analysis of necrotizing fasciitis: a review of 54 cases. A study of different postures on isometric lifting strength in normal college students. [Risk factors related to alcohol use among adolescents of fathers with alcoholism].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1