评估COVID-19抗原和PCR检测的真实数据。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5414/CP204338
Olaf Rose, Emina Obarcanin, Susanne Erzkamp
{"title":"评估COVID-19抗原和PCR检测的真实数据。","authors":"Olaf Rose,&nbsp;Emina Obarcanin,&nbsp;Susanne Erzkamp","doi":"10.5414/CP204338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE COVID-19 testing is an important pillar in fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Even though billions of tests have been conducted, little is known on performance of testing sites. This is a retrospective observational study with real-world data from a pharmacist-led COVID-19 testing center in Germany during the Omicron subvariant BA.4 and BA.5 wave in June 2022. MATERIALS The rapid antigen tests employed were purchased from Anbio Biotechnology (Xiamen, China). The RT-PCR was performed on Egens YS-qPCR-1 real-time system with Kewei multiple real-time PCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (Beijing Kewei Clinical Diagnostic Reagent Inc., Beijing, China). METHODS The study followed the STARD 2015 guideline. In this retrospective cohort study, the performance of testing sites was compared. RESULTS During the study period, 7,112 patients were tested by rapid antigen tests and 1,025 RT-PCR tests conducted. Included were 233 patients who were referred by other testing sites for confirmation of positive results. A positive predictive value of 99.6% was calculated for the antigen tests in the pharmacist-led testing center. Referred positive patients from non-medical sites were antigen and RT-PCR negative in 16 cases, which led to a positive predictive value of 88.8%. Difference between site performance was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Results indicate that nucleic acid amplification confirmation is crucial in the context of the current testing strategy in Germany. Higher standards in antigen-testing, however, can make nucleic acid amplification in active COVID-19 infections unnecessary and testing cost efficient. This study provides the first data in the world on COVID-19 testing performance, and how it can be optimized.","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":"61 4","pages":"172-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating real-world data in COVID-19 antigen and PCR testing.\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Rose,&nbsp;Emina Obarcanin,&nbsp;Susanne Erzkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE COVID-19 testing is an important pillar in fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Even though billions of tests have been conducted, little is known on performance of testing sites. This is a retrospective observational study with real-world data from a pharmacist-led COVID-19 testing center in Germany during the Omicron subvariant BA.4 and BA.5 wave in June 2022. MATERIALS The rapid antigen tests employed were purchased from Anbio Biotechnology (Xiamen, China). The RT-PCR was performed on Egens YS-qPCR-1 real-time system with Kewei multiple real-time PCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (Beijing Kewei Clinical Diagnostic Reagent Inc., Beijing, China). METHODS The study followed the STARD 2015 guideline. In this retrospective cohort study, the performance of testing sites was compared. RESULTS During the study period, 7,112 patients were tested by rapid antigen tests and 1,025 RT-PCR tests conducted. Included were 233 patients who were referred by other testing sites for confirmation of positive results. A positive predictive value of 99.6% was calculated for the antigen tests in the pharmacist-led testing center. Referred positive patients from non-medical sites were antigen and RT-PCR negative in 16 cases, which led to a positive predictive value of 88.8%. Difference between site performance was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Results indicate that nucleic acid amplification confirmation is crucial in the context of the current testing strategy in Germany. Higher standards in antigen-testing, however, can make nucleic acid amplification in active COVID-19 infections unnecessary and testing cost efficient. This study provides the first data in the world on COVID-19 testing performance, and how it can be optimized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"172-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:COVID-19检测是抗击新冠肺炎大流行的重要支柱。尽管已经进行了数十亿次测试,但人们对测试站点的性能知之甚少。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,使用了2022年6月Omicron亚变异BA.4和BA.5浪潮期间德国药剂师领导的COVID-19检测中心的真实数据。材料:所用快速抗原试验购自中国厦门安比奥生物技术有限公司。RT-PCR采用Egens s - qpcr -1实时检测系统,采用科微多重实时PCR试剂盒检测SARS-CoV-2(北京科微临床诊断试剂有限公司,北京,中国)。方法:本研究遵循STARD 2015指南。在这项回顾性队列研究中,比较了检测地点的性能。结果:在研究期间,7112例患者进行了快速抗原检测,1025例进行了RT-PCR检测。其中包括233名由其他检测机构转诊确认阳性结果的患者。在药剂师主导的检测中心,抗原检测的阳性预测值为99.6%。非医疗场所转诊阳性患者抗原阴性、RT-PCR阴性16例,阳性预测值为88.8%。两组现场表现差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:结果表明,在德国目前的检测策略背景下,核酸扩增确认至关重要。然而,抗原检测标准的提高,可能会使活动性COVID-19感染的核酸扩增变得不必要,从而降低检测成本。这项研究提供了世界上第一个关于COVID-19检测性能以及如何优化检测性能的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating real-world data in COVID-19 antigen and PCR testing.
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 testing is an important pillar in fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Even though billions of tests have been conducted, little is known on performance of testing sites. This is a retrospective observational study with real-world data from a pharmacist-led COVID-19 testing center in Germany during the Omicron subvariant BA.4 and BA.5 wave in June 2022. MATERIALS The rapid antigen tests employed were purchased from Anbio Biotechnology (Xiamen, China). The RT-PCR was performed on Egens YS-qPCR-1 real-time system with Kewei multiple real-time PCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 (Beijing Kewei Clinical Diagnostic Reagent Inc., Beijing, China). METHODS The study followed the STARD 2015 guideline. In this retrospective cohort study, the performance of testing sites was compared. RESULTS During the study period, 7,112 patients were tested by rapid antigen tests and 1,025 RT-PCR tests conducted. Included were 233 patients who were referred by other testing sites for confirmation of positive results. A positive predictive value of 99.6% was calculated for the antigen tests in the pharmacist-led testing center. Referred positive patients from non-medical sites were antigen and RT-PCR negative in 16 cases, which led to a positive predictive value of 88.8%. Difference between site performance was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Results indicate that nucleic acid amplification confirmation is crucial in the context of the current testing strategy in Germany. Higher standards in antigen-testing, however, can make nucleic acid amplification in active COVID-19 infections unnecessary and testing cost efficient. This study provides the first data in the world on COVID-19 testing performance, and how it can be optimized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Identification of factors associated with vancomycin-induced acute kidney injury: A retrospective analysis using the Common Data Model. Retrospective evaluation of medical information for predicting tazobactam/piperacillin-induced liver injury. A disproportionality analysis of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Positive effects of magnesium supplementation in metabolic syndrome. Corrigendum for the article Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 11: 525-533.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1