与一次性喂养相比,连续喂养与胃食管反流发生率低无关。

Lisa B. Mahoney, E. Liu, R. Rosen
{"title":"与一次性喂养相比,连续喂养与胃食管反流发生率低无关。","authors":"Lisa B. Mahoney, E. Liu, R. Rosen","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in children with gastrostomy tubes. Clinicians often transition to continuous feedings in an attempt to reduce reflux burden, though there is limited data to support this practice. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH studies in 18 children with gastrostomy tubes receiving exclusive enteral nutrition with a combination of daytime bolus and overnight continuous feedings. There were no significant differences in the rate of reflux (reflux events per hour) between no feeding, bolus feeding and continuous feeding periods overall or stratified by prior fundoplications (p > 0.40). After adjusting for age, BMI, feeding rate and feeding volume in multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in the risk of reflux between different feeding periods. These results suggest that continuous feedings may not offer a significant advantage in reducing reflux burden.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Feedings are Not Associated with Lower Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux When Compared to Bolus Feedings.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa B. Mahoney, E. Liu, R. Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in children with gastrostomy tubes. Clinicians often transition to continuous feedings in an attempt to reduce reflux burden, though there is limited data to support this practice. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH studies in 18 children with gastrostomy tubes receiving exclusive enteral nutrition with a combination of daytime bolus and overnight continuous feedings. There were no significant differences in the rate of reflux (reflux events per hour) between no feeding, bolus feeding and continuous feeding periods overall or stratified by prior fundoplications (p > 0.40). After adjusting for age, BMI, feeding rate and feeding volume in multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in the risk of reflux between different feeding periods. These results suggest that continuous feedings may not offer a significant advantage in reducing reflux burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

胃食管反流病常见于胃造口管患儿。临床医生经常过渡到连续喂养,试图减少反流负担,尽管有有限的数据支持这种做法。在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了18例使用胃造口管接受纯肠内营养并结合白天大剂量和夜间连续喂养的儿童的24小时多通道腔内阻抗和pH值研究。在不喂食、单次喂食和连续喂食期间,整体或按先前的基础分层,反流率(每小时反流事件)无显著差异(p > 0.40)。在多因素分析中调整年龄、BMI、摄食率和摄食量后,不同摄食期的反流风险无显著差异。这些结果表明,连续喂养在减少反流负担方面可能没有显著的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous Feedings are Not Associated with Lower Rates of Gastroesophageal Reflux When Compared to Bolus Feedings.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in children with gastrostomy tubes. Clinicians often transition to continuous feedings in an attempt to reduce reflux burden, though there is limited data to support this practice. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH studies in 18 children with gastrostomy tubes receiving exclusive enteral nutrition with a combination of daytime bolus and overnight continuous feedings. There were no significant differences in the rate of reflux (reflux events per hour) between no feeding, bolus feeding and continuous feeding periods overall or stratified by prior fundoplications (p > 0.40). After adjusting for age, BMI, feeding rate and feeding volume in multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in the risk of reflux between different feeding periods. These results suggest that continuous feedings may not offer a significant advantage in reducing reflux burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cutting Edge: a 17-Year-Old Female with Razor Blade Ingestion. Learning Curve Analyses for Achieving Satisfactory Procedural Completion Rates in Paediatric Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Trough Levels of Infliximab at W6 Are Predictive of Remission at W14 in Pediatric Crohn Disease. Community Socioeconomic Deprivation and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Severity. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1