优化护理点测试的质量实践

S. Sengupta, A. Handoo
{"title":"优化护理点测试的质量实践","authors":"S. Sengupta, A. Handoo","doi":"10.1097/poc.0000000000000198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With testing in health care becoming more decentralized to include the patient bedside, quality assurance in point-of-care testing (POCT) assumes immense significance in optimizing clinical outcomes. However, complex regulatory requirements, training of testing personnel, and implementation of a uniform quality policy in varied locations across the hospital pose the greatest challenges in achieving the desired result. Although 70 POCT instruments were being used across our hospital, there was no structured program in place. In accordance with the requirements of the Joint Commission (JCI) accreditation, efforts were made to bring the supervision of POCT under the supervision of the laboratory. Initial internal audits revealed absence of quality assurance policies, inadequate documentation, and lack of uniformity in POCT practices across the hospital. Standard operating procedures on uniform POCT practice, quality control, and critical values were formulated. Training of testing personnel was conducted. Internal quality control and proficiency testing programs were designed and implemented. Periodic evaluation revealed a paradigm shift in the attitude of the testing personnel and the treating physicians toward POCT. It helped in ensuring strict adherence to quality practices in POCT and increased confidence in the reported results. This impacted positive clinical outcomes. Although, on one hand, the implementation of a structured POCT program facilitated the accreditation by the Joint Commission, it also helped us achieve uniformity and a high level of quality in POCT across the hospital. A multidisciplinary organizational approach for POCT under the direct supervision of the laboratory improved the quality of patient care.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Quality Practices in Point-of-Care Testing\",\"authors\":\"S. Sengupta, A. Handoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/poc.0000000000000198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract With testing in health care becoming more decentralized to include the patient bedside, quality assurance in point-of-care testing (POCT) assumes immense significance in optimizing clinical outcomes. However, complex regulatory requirements, training of testing personnel, and implementation of a uniform quality policy in varied locations across the hospital pose the greatest challenges in achieving the desired result. Although 70 POCT instruments were being used across our hospital, there was no structured program in place. In accordance with the requirements of the Joint Commission (JCI) accreditation, efforts were made to bring the supervision of POCT under the supervision of the laboratory. Initial internal audits revealed absence of quality assurance policies, inadequate documentation, and lack of uniformity in POCT practices across the hospital. Standard operating procedures on uniform POCT practice, quality control, and critical values were formulated. Training of testing personnel was conducted. Internal quality control and proficiency testing programs were designed and implemented. Periodic evaluation revealed a paradigm shift in the attitude of the testing personnel and the treating physicians toward POCT. It helped in ensuring strict adherence to quality practices in POCT and increased confidence in the reported results. This impacted positive clinical outcomes. Although, on one hand, the implementation of a structured POCT program facilitated the accreditation by the Joint Commission, it also helped us achieve uniformity and a high level of quality in POCT across the hospital. A multidisciplinary organizational approach for POCT under the direct supervision of the laboratory improved the quality of patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/poc.0000000000000198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/poc.0000000000000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着医疗保健测试变得更加分散,包括患者床边,在护理点测试(POCT)的质量保证在优化临床结果具有巨大的意义。然而,复杂的法规要求、测试人员的培训以及在医院不同地点实施统一的质量政策,对实现预期结果构成了最大的挑战。尽管整个医院使用了70台POCT设备,但并没有一个结构化的程序。根据联合委员会(JCI)认可的要求,努力将POCT的监督置于实验室的监督之下。最初的内部审计发现缺乏质量保证政策,文件不足,以及整个医院POCT实践缺乏一致性。制定了统一POCT实践、质量控制和临界值的标准操作程序。对检测人员进行培训。设计并实施了内部质量控制和能力测试程序。定期评估显示,测试人员和治疗医生对POCT的态度发生了范式转变。它有助于确保严格遵守POCT的质量做法,并增加对报告结果的信心。这影响了积极的临床结果。虽然,一方面,结构化POCT项目的实施促进了联合委员会的认证,但它也帮助我们在整个医院实现了POCT的统一性和高质量。在实验室的直接监督下,POCT的多学科组织方法提高了患者护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Quality Practices in Point-of-Care Testing
Abstract With testing in health care becoming more decentralized to include the patient bedside, quality assurance in point-of-care testing (POCT) assumes immense significance in optimizing clinical outcomes. However, complex regulatory requirements, training of testing personnel, and implementation of a uniform quality policy in varied locations across the hospital pose the greatest challenges in achieving the desired result. Although 70 POCT instruments were being used across our hospital, there was no structured program in place. In accordance with the requirements of the Joint Commission (JCI) accreditation, efforts were made to bring the supervision of POCT under the supervision of the laboratory. Initial internal audits revealed absence of quality assurance policies, inadequate documentation, and lack of uniformity in POCT practices across the hospital. Standard operating procedures on uniform POCT practice, quality control, and critical values were formulated. Training of testing personnel was conducted. Internal quality control and proficiency testing programs were designed and implemented. Periodic evaluation revealed a paradigm shift in the attitude of the testing personnel and the treating physicians toward POCT. It helped in ensuring strict adherence to quality practices in POCT and increased confidence in the reported results. This impacted positive clinical outcomes. Although, on one hand, the implementation of a structured POCT program facilitated the accreditation by the Joint Commission, it also helped us achieve uniformity and a high level of quality in POCT across the hospital. A multidisciplinary organizational approach for POCT under the direct supervision of the laboratory improved the quality of patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of International Normalized Ratio Results by Point-of-Care Device and Clinical Laboratory Analyzers in a Vascular Surgery Department Point-of-Care Testing in Hypercoagulable Conditions Managed With Warfarin Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing Rapid Assessment of Coagulation at the Point of Care With the Hemochron Signature Elite System Invited Product Profile: Detecting Antibodies for Lyme Disease at the Point of Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1