Steven A. Sargent , James F. Steffe , Thomas R. Pierson
{"title":"苹果加工废弃物在厂内焚烧的经济可行性","authors":"Steven A. Sargent , James F. Steffe , Thomas R. Pierson","doi":"10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100062,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Wastes","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 85-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic feasibility of in-plant combustion of apple processing wastes\",\"authors\":\"Steven A. Sargent , James F. Steffe , Thomas R. Pierson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Wastes\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0141460786900405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0141460786900405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The economic feasibility of in-plant combustion of apple processing wastes
Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.