苹果加工废弃物在厂内焚烧的经济可行性

Steven A. Sargent , James F. Steffe , Thomas R. Pierson
{"title":"苹果加工废弃物在厂内焚烧的经济可行性","authors":"Steven A. Sargent ,&nbsp;James F. Steffe ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Pierson","doi":"10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100062,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Wastes","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 85-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic feasibility of in-plant combustion of apple processing wastes\",\"authors\":\"Steven A. Sargent ,&nbsp;James F. Steffe ,&nbsp;Thomas R. Pierson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Wastes\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-4607(86)90040-5\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0141460786900405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0141460786900405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

苹果加工商可以通过在厂内燃烧苹果渣来减少化石燃料和废物处理成本。采用生命周期成本计算技术以1983年价格比较处理/锅炉系统投资的平均年成本(在税收计算之前)。操作条件代表一家小型和大型公司(每天分别生产27 200公斤和90 700公斤渣滓),将燃烧所产生的所有渣滓。假设三个处理/锅炉系统的总固定成本为14%的年利率,还款期为5年。在化石燃料价格为每千焦耳7.14美元的情况下,小型加工商承担80%的处置成本,大型加工商承担20%的处置成本,这笔投资将具有成本效益。盈亏平衡点对废物流量、处置成本和化石燃料价格最为敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The economic feasibility of in-plant combustion of apple processing wastes

Reductions in fossil fuel and waste disposal costs could be achieved by apple processors through in-plant combustion of apple pomace. Life Cycle Costing techniques were employed to compare the average annual costs (prior to tax calculations) for investment in a handling/boiler system at 1983 prices. Operating conditions were representative of a small and large firm (producing 27 200 and 90 700 kg of pomace per day, respectively), which would combust all of the pomace generated. A loan of 14% annual interest with a 5-year payback period was assumed for the total fixed cost of each of three handling/boiler systems. The investment would be cost-effective for a small processor incurring 80% of disposal costs and for a large processor incurring 20% of disposal costs, with a fossil fuel price of $7·14 per gigajoule. The break-even point is most sensitive to waste flow rate, disposal cost and fossil fuel price.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Editorial Board Announcement Editorial Board Announcement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1