一个部门制定的协议,以改善教师居民的反馈。

Ross Pallansch, Robert R Gaiser
{"title":"一个部门制定的协议,以改善教师居民的反馈。","authors":"Ross Pallansch,&nbsp;Robert R Gaiser","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue1_gaiser","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback from faculty to residents is important for the development of the resident. Effective feedback between faculty and residents requires trust between the two parties. An agreement between faculty and residents was developed to determine whether it would improve resident satisfaction with feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Groups of faculty and residents met to discuss expectations and barriers to feedback. Based on this information, the two groups developed a Feedback Agreement that was edited and approved by the entire Department of Anesthesiology. The Feedback Agreement was presented in meetings with the faculty and the residents. To assess satisfaction with feedback, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey was used, as it assesses resident satisfaction with various aspects of the program, and was compared before and after the agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The satisfaction scores with feedback before the Feedback Agreement were statistically lower than scores for the specialty and for all residents in training programs. Satisfaction rose from 53% of 76 respondents (average score of 3.5 in 2020 to 2021) to 74% of 78 respondents being satisfied or extremely satisfied (average score of 4.0 in 2021 to 2022; <i>P</i> = .03). This score was not statistically different from residents in Anesthesiology programs or all residents in training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The development of a Feedback Agreement improved resident satisfaction with faculty feedback as assessed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 1","pages":"E697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029112/pdf/i2333-0406-25-1-Gaiser.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Departmentally Developed Agreement to Improve Faculty-Resident Feedback.\",\"authors\":\"Ross Pallansch,&nbsp;Robert R Gaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxv_issue1_gaiser\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback from faculty to residents is important for the development of the resident. Effective feedback between faculty and residents requires trust between the two parties. An agreement between faculty and residents was developed to determine whether it would improve resident satisfaction with feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Groups of faculty and residents met to discuss expectations and barriers to feedback. Based on this information, the two groups developed a Feedback Agreement that was edited and approved by the entire Department of Anesthesiology. The Feedback Agreement was presented in meetings with the faculty and the residents. To assess satisfaction with feedback, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey was used, as it assesses resident satisfaction with various aspects of the program, and was compared before and after the agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The satisfaction scores with feedback before the Feedback Agreement were statistically lower than scores for the specialty and for all residents in training programs. Satisfaction rose from 53% of 76 respondents (average score of 3.5 in 2020 to 2021) to 74% of 78 respondents being satisfied or extremely satisfied (average score of 4.0 in 2021 to 2022; <i>P</i> = .03). This score was not statistically different from residents in Anesthesiology programs or all residents in training programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The development of a Feedback Agreement improved resident satisfaction with faculty feedback as assessed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"E697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10029112/pdf/i2333-0406-25-1-Gaiser.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue1_gaiser\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue1_gaiser","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:教师对住院医师的反馈对住院医师的发展很重要。教员和住院医师之间的有效反馈需要双方之间的信任。教师和住院医生之间达成了一项协议,以确定它是否会提高住院医生对反馈的满意度。方法:教师和住院医师分组讨论期望和反馈障碍。基于这些信息,两个小组制定了一份反馈协议,由整个麻醉科编辑和批准。反馈协议是在与教师和住院医生的会议上提出的。为了评估对反馈的满意度,我们使用了研究生医学教育认证委员会的住院医生调查,因为它评估了住院医生对项目各个方面的满意度,并在协议前后进行了比较。结果:在签订反馈协议前,住院医师对反馈的满意度得分明显低于专业和所有住院医师的满意度得分。满意度从76名受访者中的53%(2020年至2021年平均得分为3.5分)上升到78名受访者中的74%(2021年至2022年平均得分为4.0分;P = .03)。这个分数与麻醉学项目的住院医生或所有培训项目的住院医生没有统计学差异。结论:根据研究生医学教育认证委员会的住院医师调查,反馈协议的制定提高了住院医师对教师反馈的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Departmentally Developed Agreement to Improve Faculty-Resident Feedback.

Background: Feedback from faculty to residents is important for the development of the resident. Effective feedback between faculty and residents requires trust between the two parties. An agreement between faculty and residents was developed to determine whether it would improve resident satisfaction with feedback.

Methods: Groups of faculty and residents met to discuss expectations and barriers to feedback. Based on this information, the two groups developed a Feedback Agreement that was edited and approved by the entire Department of Anesthesiology. The Feedback Agreement was presented in meetings with the faculty and the residents. To assess satisfaction with feedback, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey was used, as it assesses resident satisfaction with various aspects of the program, and was compared before and after the agreement.

Results: The satisfaction scores with feedback before the Feedback Agreement were statistically lower than scores for the specialty and for all residents in training programs. Satisfaction rose from 53% of 76 respondents (average score of 3.5 in 2020 to 2021) to 74% of 78 respondents being satisfied or extremely satisfied (average score of 4.0 in 2021 to 2022; P = .03). This score was not statistically different from residents in Anesthesiology programs or all residents in training programs.

Conclusions: The development of a Feedback Agreement improved resident satisfaction with faculty feedback as assessed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident survey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1