“我们需要以不同的方式教学校”:学会为正义而教社会研究

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Social Studies Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jssr.2021.10.002
Christopher C. Martell , Rob Martinelle , Jennifer P. Chalmers-Curren
{"title":"“我们需要以不同的方式教学校”:学会为正义而教社会研究","authors":"Christopher C. Martell ,&nbsp;Rob Martinelle ,&nbsp;Jennifer P. Chalmers-Curren","doi":"10.1016/j.jssr.2021.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using interpretative case study methods, the researchers examined the beliefs and practices of 10 preservice social studies<span> teachers with self-described preferences to teach for justice. While all of the participants in this study identified as committed to justice, there was a division between teachers whose beliefs were tolerance-oriented (focused primarily on individual prejudice) and teachers whose beliefs were equity-oriented (focused primarily on systemic oppression). Across the cases, we generally found that the teachers were grouped into three types: teachers not making progress toward critical social studies, teachers implementing critical social studies irregularly, and teachers implementing critical social studies regularly. Teachers who had strong equity-oriented beliefs were more likely to implement critical social studies regularly in their classrooms during student teaching.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":38375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Studies Research","volume":"46 4","pages":"Pages 345-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We need to teach school differently”: Learning to teach social studies for justice\",\"authors\":\"Christopher C. Martell ,&nbsp;Rob Martinelle ,&nbsp;Jennifer P. Chalmers-Curren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jssr.2021.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using interpretative case study methods, the researchers examined the beliefs and practices of 10 preservice social studies<span> teachers with self-described preferences to teach for justice. While all of the participants in this study identified as committed to justice, there was a division between teachers whose beliefs were tolerance-oriented (focused primarily on individual prejudice) and teachers whose beliefs were equity-oriented (focused primarily on systemic oppression). Across the cases, we generally found that the teachers were grouped into three types: teachers not making progress toward critical social studies, teachers implementing critical social studies irregularly, and teachers implementing critical social studies regularly. Teachers who had strong equity-oriented beliefs were more likely to implement critical social studies regularly in their classrooms during student teaching.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Studies Research\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 345-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Studies Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885985X21000450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Studies Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885985X21000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

使用解释性案例研究方法,研究人员调查了10名职前社会研究教师的信仰和实践,他们自我描述了为正义而教书的偏好。虽然本研究中的所有参与者都被认为致力于正义,但在信仰以宽容为导向(主要关注个人偏见)的教师和信仰以公平为导向(主要关注系统压迫)的教师之间存在分歧。在这些案例中,我们普遍发现教师被分为三种类型:在批判性社会研究方面没有取得进展的教师、不定期实施批判性社会研究的教师和定期实施批判性社会研究的教师。具有强烈公平导向信念的教师更有可能在学生教学期间定期在课堂上实施批判性社会研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“We need to teach school differently”: Learning to teach social studies for justice

Using interpretative case study methods, the researchers examined the beliefs and practices of 10 preservice social studies teachers with self-described preferences to teach for justice. While all of the participants in this study identified as committed to justice, there was a division between teachers whose beliefs were tolerance-oriented (focused primarily on individual prejudice) and teachers whose beliefs were equity-oriented (focused primarily on systemic oppression). Across the cases, we generally found that the teachers were grouped into three types: teachers not making progress toward critical social studies, teachers implementing critical social studies irregularly, and teachers implementing critical social studies regularly. Teachers who had strong equity-oriented beliefs were more likely to implement critical social studies regularly in their classrooms during student teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Studies Research
Journal of Social Studies Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Studies Research (JSSR) is an internationally recognized peer-reviewed journal designed to foster the dissemination of ideas and research findings related to the social studies. JSSR is the official publication of The International Society for the Social Studies (ISSS). JSSR is published four times per year (winter, spring, summer, & fall).
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of group investigation versus lecture-based instruction on students’ concept mastery and transfer in social studies Using eyewitnesses to promote students’ understanding of empathy in the history classroom Teach what you preach? The relationship between teachers’ citizenship beliefs and citizenship education in the classroom Troubling state (of) affairs: A critical analysis of a state-approved, elementary field trip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1