在符合z0011标准的单中心乳腺癌队列中前哨淋巴结活检和腋窝淋巴结清扫的临床结果比较

Heein Jo, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Eunjin Song, Jai Hong Han, So-Youn Jung, Han-Sung Kang, Eun Sook Lee, Seeyoun Lee
{"title":"在符合z0011标准的单中心乳腺癌队列中前哨淋巴结活检和腋窝淋巴结清扫的临床结果比较","authors":"Heein Jo,&nbsp;Eun-Gyeong Lee,&nbsp;Eunjin Song,&nbsp;Jai Hong Han,&nbsp;So-Youn Jung,&nbsp;Han-Sung Kang,&nbsp;Eun Sook Lee,&nbsp;Seeyoun Lee","doi":"10.14216/kjco.20004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has proven the oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLBx) for node negative breast cancer. Accordingly, treatment paradigm including axilla surgery was changed. We retrospectively reviewed breast cancer patients to evaluate the clinical effect of paradigm shift in breast cancer surgery after applying the Z0011 criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women who underwent breast-conserving surgery at the National Cancer Center between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, were enrolled and classified according to the Z0011 criteria. The primary endpoint of the study was the disease-free survival rates, and the secondary was the adverse events, especially arm lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 361 patients were enrolled the study (271 axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] group, 90 SLBx group). After the Z0011 guideline was adopted in our institute, the use of ALND decreased, and lymph node sampling (removing only a few axillary lymph nodes) replaced ALND. The total mean number of retrieved nodes were more in ALND group (13.02) than SLBx group (3.43). However, there was no difference in the mean number of positive nodes between two groups (2.34 in ALND group vs. 1.12 in SLBx group, P=0.001). During follow-up, 25 patients experienced disease recurrence: 22 from the ALND group and three from the SLBx group. All of died seven patients were from the ALND group. The ALND group had more complications than the SLBx group (P=0.02). Arm edema occurred more frequently in the ALND group (29.5%) than in the SLBx group (5.6%), although without statistical significance (P=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we concluded that SLBx can be used safely in Z0011-eligible cohort without increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Moreover, we found that omission of ALND is favored to reduce some serious complications such as arm lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":74045,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/22/kjco-16-1-18.PMC9942717.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical outcomes between sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection in a single-center Z0011-eligible breast cancer cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Heein Jo,&nbsp;Eun-Gyeong Lee,&nbsp;Eunjin Song,&nbsp;Jai Hong Han,&nbsp;So-Youn Jung,&nbsp;Han-Sung Kang,&nbsp;Eun Sook Lee,&nbsp;Seeyoun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14216/kjco.20004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has proven the oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLBx) for node negative breast cancer. Accordingly, treatment paradigm including axilla surgery was changed. We retrospectively reviewed breast cancer patients to evaluate the clinical effect of paradigm shift in breast cancer surgery after applying the Z0011 criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All women who underwent breast-conserving surgery at the National Cancer Center between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, were enrolled and classified according to the Z0011 criteria. The primary endpoint of the study was the disease-free survival rates, and the secondary was the adverse events, especially arm lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 361 patients were enrolled the study (271 axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] group, 90 SLBx group). After the Z0011 guideline was adopted in our institute, the use of ALND decreased, and lymph node sampling (removing only a few axillary lymph nodes) replaced ALND. The total mean number of retrieved nodes were more in ALND group (13.02) than SLBx group (3.43). However, there was no difference in the mean number of positive nodes between two groups (2.34 in ALND group vs. 1.12 in SLBx group, P=0.001). During follow-up, 25 patients experienced disease recurrence: 22 from the ALND group and three from the SLBx group. All of died seven patients were from the ALND group. The ALND group had more complications than the SLBx group (P=0.02). Arm edema occurred more frequently in the ALND group (29.5%) than in the SLBx group (5.6%), although without statistical significance (P=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, we concluded that SLBx can be used safely in Z0011-eligible cohort without increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Moreover, we found that omission of ALND is favored to reduce some serious complications such as arm lymphedema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/22/kjco-16-1-18.PMC9942717.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.20004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.20004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:ACOSOG Z0011试验证明了前哨淋巴结活检(SLBx)治疗淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的肿瘤学安全性。因此,改变了包括腋窝手术在内的治疗模式。我们回顾性地回顾了乳腺癌患者,以评估应用Z0011标准后乳腺癌手术中范式转移的临床效果。方法:所有于2000年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在国家癌症中心接受保乳手术的女性,按照Z0011标准进行分类。研究的主要终点是无病生存率,次要终点是不良事件,特别是手臂淋巴水肿。结果:共纳入361例患者,其中腋窝淋巴结清扫组271例,SLBx组90例。我院采用Z0011指南后,ALND的使用减少,淋巴结取样(仅切除少量腋窝淋巴结)取代了ALND。ALND组总平均检索节点数(13.02个)高于SLBx组(3.43个)。然而,两组间平均阳性淋巴结数无差异(ALND组为2.34个,SLBx组为1.12个,P=0.001)。随访期间,25例患者出现疾病复发:22例来自ALND组,3例来自SLBx组。死亡7例均为ALND组。ALND组并发症发生率高于SLBx组(P=0.02)。ALND组上肢水肿发生率(29.5%)高于SLBx组(5.6%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.07)。结论:在我们的研究中,我们得出结论,SLBx可以安全地用于符合z0011条件的队列,而不会增加局部复发的风险。此外,我们发现,遗漏ALND有利于减少一些严重的并发症,如手臂淋巴水肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of clinical outcomes between sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection in a single-center Z0011-eligible breast cancer cohort.

Purpose: The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has proven the oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLBx) for node negative breast cancer. Accordingly, treatment paradigm including axilla surgery was changed. We retrospectively reviewed breast cancer patients to evaluate the clinical effect of paradigm shift in breast cancer surgery after applying the Z0011 criteria.

Methods: All women who underwent breast-conserving surgery at the National Cancer Center between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, were enrolled and classified according to the Z0011 criteria. The primary endpoint of the study was the disease-free survival rates, and the secondary was the adverse events, especially arm lymphedema.

Results: Total 361 patients were enrolled the study (271 axillary lymph node dissection [ALND] group, 90 SLBx group). After the Z0011 guideline was adopted in our institute, the use of ALND decreased, and lymph node sampling (removing only a few axillary lymph nodes) replaced ALND. The total mean number of retrieved nodes were more in ALND group (13.02) than SLBx group (3.43). However, there was no difference in the mean number of positive nodes between two groups (2.34 in ALND group vs. 1.12 in SLBx group, P=0.001). During follow-up, 25 patients experienced disease recurrence: 22 from the ALND group and three from the SLBx group. All of died seven patients were from the ALND group. The ALND group had more complications than the SLBx group (P=0.02). Arm edema occurred more frequently in the ALND group (29.5%) than in the SLBx group (5.6%), although without statistical significance (P=0.07).

Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that SLBx can be used safely in Z0011-eligible cohort without increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Moreover, we found that omission of ALND is favored to reduce some serious complications such as arm lymphedema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of tumor budding and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with clinicopathological parameters in gallbladder carcinoma. Clinical course of pancreas cancer diagnosed after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with borderline lesion: two case reports. Measurement of human peritoneal surface area using artificial intelligence software in abdominal computed tomography. Pancreatoduodenectomy with colon-last approach for advanced pancreatic head cancer. Prediction of the minimum amount of anti-adhesive agent required for entire intra-abdominal cavity using fluorescent dye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1