焦虑症的认知行为疗法能改善威胁重估吗?:荟萃分析

Amanda A. Draheim, Page L. Anderson
{"title":"焦虑症的认知行为疗法能改善威胁重估吗?:荟萃分析","authors":"Amanda A. Draheim,&nbsp;Page L. Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2020.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy improves exaggerated appraisals of threat among people with a primary anxiety disorder. The current meta-analysis of 19 </span>randomized clinical trials (1594 participants) tests whether cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal to a greater extent than wait-list control conditions, non-cognitive behavioral treatments, and active control conditions. A statistically significant and large cumulative effect (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.76, 95% CI: [0.51–1.01], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy produces greater improvements in threat reappraisal relative to a comparison condition. Heterogeneity of the effect was high (<em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->80.92%). A moderator analyses showed this effect was significant when compared to waitlist control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.08) non-cognitive behavioral treatments (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37), and active control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.29). The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on threat reappraisal was greater for studies on panic disorder (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.06) relative to social anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.60) and generalized anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.35). Findings from this meta-analysis support cognitive models of anxiety, which assert that cognitive behavioral therapy improves people's ability to make more realistic appraisals of threat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal?: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Amanda A. Draheim,&nbsp;Page L. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2020.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy improves exaggerated appraisals of threat among people with a primary anxiety disorder. The current meta-analysis of 19 </span>randomized clinical trials (1594 participants) tests whether cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal to a greater extent than wait-list control conditions, non-cognitive behavioral treatments, and active control conditions. A statistically significant and large cumulative effect (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.76, 95% CI: [0.51–1.01], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy produces greater improvements in threat reappraisal relative to a comparison condition. Heterogeneity of the effect was high (<em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->80.92%). A moderator analyses showed this effect was significant when compared to waitlist control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.08) non-cognitive behavioral treatments (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37), and active control conditions (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.29). The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on threat reappraisal was greater for studies on panic disorder (<em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>1.06) relative to social anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.60) and generalized anxiety disorder (</span><em>g</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.35). Findings from this meta-analysis support cognitive models of anxiety, which assert that cognitive behavioral therapy improves people's ability to make more realistic appraisals of threat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 125-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979120300664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979120300664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究的目的是评估认知行为疗法改善原发性焦虑障碍患者夸大的威胁评估的证据。目前对19项随机临床试验(1594名参与者)的荟萃分析测试了焦虑症的认知行为治疗是否比等候名单对照条件、非认知行为治疗和主动对照条件更能改善威胁重新评估。统计学上显著且较大的累积效应(g = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.51-1.01], p <0.01)表明认知行为疗法在威胁重评方面比比较条件有更大的改善。效果异质性高(I2 = 80.92%)。调节分析显示,与等候名单控制条件(g = 1.08)、非认知行为治疗(g = 0.37)和主动控制条件(g = 0.29)相比,这种效果是显著的。认知行为治疗对惊恐障碍(g = 1.06)的影响大于社交焦虑障碍(g = 0.60)和广泛性焦虑障碍(g = 0.35)。这项荟萃分析的发现支持了焦虑的认知模型,该模型断言认知行为疗法提高了人们对威胁做出更现实评估的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal?: A meta-analysis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy improves exaggerated appraisals of threat among people with a primary anxiety disorder. The current meta-analysis of 19 randomized clinical trials (1594 participants) tests whether cognitive behavioral treatments for anxiety disorders improve threat reappraisal to a greater extent than wait-list control conditions, non-cognitive behavioral treatments, and active control conditions. A statistically significant and large cumulative effect (g = 0.76, 95% CI: [0.51–1.01], p < 0.01) indicated that cognitive behavioral therapy produces greater improvements in threat reappraisal relative to a comparison condition. Heterogeneity of the effect was high (I2 = 80.92%). A moderator analyses showed this effect was significant when compared to waitlist control conditions (g = 1.08) non-cognitive behavioral treatments (g = 0.37), and active control conditions (g = 0.29). The effect of cognitive behavioral treatment on threat reappraisal was greater for studies on panic disorder (g = 1.06) relative to social anxiety disorder (g = 0.60) and generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.35). Findings from this meta-analysis support cognitive models of anxiety, which assert that cognitive behavioral therapy improves people's ability to make more realistic appraisals of threat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff Analyzing data in single-case experimental designs: Objectives and available software options The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health problems of children and adolescents in child protection system: A meta-analysis Assessing user acceptance of a mental health app & its impact on depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder related knowledge: A mixed method experimental study Morphological changes and body representation: A study of the link between weight cycling and body schema disturbances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1