中国大陆地区接受或不接受康复治疗的烧伤患者的功能结局

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.003
Dan Tang , Cecilia W.P. Li-Tsang , Ricky K.C. Au , Kui-cheng Li , Xian-feng Yi , Lin-rong Liao , Hai-yan Cao , Ya-nan Feng , Chuan-shun Liu
{"title":"中国大陆地区接受或不接受康复治疗的烧伤患者的功能结局","authors":"Dan Tang ,&nbsp;Cecilia W.P. Li-Tsang ,&nbsp;Ricky K.C. Au ,&nbsp;Kui-cheng Li ,&nbsp;Xian-feng Yi ,&nbsp;Lin-rong Liao ,&nbsp;Hai-yan Cao ,&nbsp;Ya-nan Feng ,&nbsp;Chuan-shun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the functional outcomes of moderate to severe burn patients with and without rehabilitation in terms of self-care performance and quality of life (QOL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-five patients with total burn surface area of 30% or more were divided into two groups: rehabilitation and conventional care groups. The rehabilitation group underwent comprehensive rehabilitation interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and patient and family education) in addition to standard clinical interventions received by the conventional care group. The outcomes included self-care performance (Modified Barthel Index [MBI]), QOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF), pain and itchiness (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), quality of sleep, and mental health (Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS] and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale) measured before and 3 months after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the intervention, significant improvements were found in MBI, all dimensions of QOL, pain, and SDS in the rehabilitation group (all <em>p</em> &lt; .05). In the conventional care group, significant improvements were found only in MBI (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), the physical health dimension of QOL (<em>p</em> &lt; .01), and pain (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Group comparisons showed that the rehabilitation group achieved significantly better outcomes after the intervention in MBI (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), VAS score of itching (<em>p</em> = .009), and the physical health (<em>p</em> = .002), psychological health (<em>p</em> = .021), and social relationships dimensions of QOL (<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with moderate to severe burn injuries can benefit from rehabilitation interventions in terms of physical health, mental health, performance of daily living, and QOL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.003","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Outcomes of Burn Patients With or Without Rehabilitation in Mainland China\",\"authors\":\"Dan Tang ,&nbsp;Cecilia W.P. Li-Tsang ,&nbsp;Ricky K.C. Au ,&nbsp;Kui-cheng Li ,&nbsp;Xian-feng Yi ,&nbsp;Lin-rong Liao ,&nbsp;Hai-yan Cao ,&nbsp;Ya-nan Feng ,&nbsp;Chuan-shun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the functional outcomes of moderate to severe burn patients with and without rehabilitation in terms of self-care performance and quality of life (QOL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-five patients with total burn surface area of 30% or more were divided into two groups: rehabilitation and conventional care groups. The rehabilitation group underwent comprehensive rehabilitation interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and patient and family education) in addition to standard clinical interventions received by the conventional care group. The outcomes included self-care performance (Modified Barthel Index [MBI]), QOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF), pain and itchiness (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), quality of sleep, and mental health (Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS] and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale) measured before and 3 months after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the intervention, significant improvements were found in MBI, all dimensions of QOL, pain, and SDS in the rehabilitation group (all <em>p</em> &lt; .05). In the conventional care group, significant improvements were found only in MBI (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), the physical health dimension of QOL (<em>p</em> &lt; .01), and pain (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Group comparisons showed that the rehabilitation group achieved significantly better outcomes after the intervention in MBI (<em>p</em> &lt; .001), VAS score of itching (<em>p</em> = .009), and the physical health (<em>p</em> = .002), psychological health (<em>p</em> = .021), and social relationships dimensions of QOL (<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with moderate to severe burn injuries can benefit from rehabilitation interventions in terms of physical health, mental health, performance of daily living, and QOL.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

背景/目的从自我护理表现和生活质量(QOL)两方面评价中重度烧伤患者有和没有康复的功能结局。方法55例烧伤总面积≥30%的患者分为康复组和常规护理组。康复组除常规护理组接受的标准临床干预外,还接受了综合康复干预(如职业治疗、物理治疗、患者和家庭教育)。结果包括干预前和干预后3个月的自我护理表现(改良Barthel指数[MBI])、QOL(世界卫生组织生活质量bref)、疼痛和瘙痒(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、睡眠质量和心理健康(抑郁自评量表[SDS]和焦虑自评量表)。结果干预后,康复组患者的MBI、生活质量、疼痛、SDS均有显著改善(p <. 05)。在常规护理组中,只有MBI有显著改善(p <.001),生活质量生理健康维度(p <.01),疼痛(p <措施)。组间比较显示,康复组干预后MBI的治疗效果明显优于康复组(p <.001)、瘙痒VAS评分(p = 0.009)、身体健康(p = 0.002)、心理健康(p = 0.021)、生活质量社会关系维度(p <措施)。结论中重度烧伤患者在身体健康、心理健康、日常生活能力和生活质量方面均可接受康复干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functional Outcomes of Burn Patients With or Without Rehabilitation in Mainland China

Background/Objective

To evaluate the functional outcomes of moderate to severe burn patients with and without rehabilitation in terms of self-care performance and quality of life (QOL).

Methods

Fifty-five patients with total burn surface area of 30% or more were divided into two groups: rehabilitation and conventional care groups. The rehabilitation group underwent comprehensive rehabilitation interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and patient and family education) in addition to standard clinical interventions received by the conventional care group. The outcomes included self-care performance (Modified Barthel Index [MBI]), QOL (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF), pain and itchiness (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), quality of sleep, and mental health (Self-Rating Depression Scale [SDS] and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale) measured before and 3 months after the intervention.

Results

After the intervention, significant improvements were found in MBI, all dimensions of QOL, pain, and SDS in the rehabilitation group (all p < .05). In the conventional care group, significant improvements were found only in MBI (p < .001), the physical health dimension of QOL (p < .01), and pain (p < .001). Group comparisons showed that the rehabilitation group achieved significantly better outcomes after the intervention in MBI (p < .001), VAS score of itching (p = .009), and the physical health (p = .002), psychological health (p = .021), and social relationships dimensions of QOL (p < .001).

Conclusion

Patients with moderate to severe burn injuries can benefit from rehabilitation interventions in terms of physical health, mental health, performance of daily living, and QOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study Unlocking the potential: Exploring the opportunities for occupational therapists in cyberpsychology Use of Gamification for Adult Physical Rehabilitation in Occupational Therapy; A Novel Concept? Usability of a mobile phone application to enhance activities of daily living in occupational therapy services for breast cancer survivors A randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of the abridged illness management and recovery program for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1