系统评价:在急性和亚急性情况下使用减压气垫处方是否合理?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.12.002
Alyce Folan , Sharon Downie , Annabelle Bond
{"title":"系统评价:在急性和亚急性情况下使用减压气垫处方是否合理?","authors":"Alyce Folan ,&nbsp;Sharon Downie ,&nbsp;Annabelle Bond","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>Pressure injuries are a common yet largely preventable complication of hospitalisation. Whilst occupational therapists commonly prescribe pressure-relieving devices to reduce these risks, evidence to support clinical decision-making is limited. The purpose of this study was thus to examine research literature as to the efficacy of pneumatic cushions for general acute/subacute patient populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of various databases was conducted, and the literature was then appraised using standardised inclusion/exclusion parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three randomised controlled trials were identified that met search criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Whilst there is currently preliminary evidence to support the effectiveness of pneumatic pressure-relieving cushions as compared to standard foam, specific recommendations as to a preferred make/model of cushion for use within general hospital settings are not supported at this time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.12.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review: Is Prescription of Pressure-relieving Air Cushions Justified in Acute and Subacute Settings?\",\"authors\":\"Alyce Folan ,&nbsp;Sharon Downie ,&nbsp;Annabelle Bond\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Objective</h3><p>Pressure injuries are a common yet largely preventable complication of hospitalisation. Whilst occupational therapists commonly prescribe pressure-relieving devices to reduce these risks, evidence to support clinical decision-making is limited. The purpose of this study was thus to examine research literature as to the efficacy of pneumatic cushions for general acute/subacute patient populations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of various databases was conducted, and the literature was then appraised using standardised inclusion/exclusion parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three randomised controlled trials were identified that met search criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Whilst there is currently preliminary evidence to support the effectiveness of pneumatic pressure-relieving cushions as compared to standard foam, specific recommendations as to a preferred make/model of cushion for use within general hospital settings are not supported at this time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000376\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景/目的压伤是一种常见的住院并发症,但在很大程度上是可以预防的。虽然职业治疗师通常会开减压装置来降低这些风险,但支持临床决策的证据有限。因此,本研究的目的是检查关于气垫对一般急性/亚急性患者人群的疗效的研究文献。方法系统检索各类数据库,采用标准化的纳入/排除参数对文献进行评价。结果3个随机对照试验符合检索标准。结论:虽然目前有初步证据支持气动减压缓冲垫与标准泡沫缓冲垫相比的有效性,但目前还不支持在一般医院环境中使用的缓冲垫的首选品牌/型号的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review: Is Prescription of Pressure-relieving Air Cushions Justified in Acute and Subacute Settings?

Background/Objective

Pressure injuries are a common yet largely preventable complication of hospitalisation. Whilst occupational therapists commonly prescribe pressure-relieving devices to reduce these risks, evidence to support clinical decision-making is limited. The purpose of this study was thus to examine research literature as to the efficacy of pneumatic cushions for general acute/subacute patient populations.

Methods

A systematic search of various databases was conducted, and the literature was then appraised using standardised inclusion/exclusion parameters.

Results

Three randomised controlled trials were identified that met search criteria.

Conclusion

Whilst there is currently preliminary evidence to support the effectiveness of pneumatic pressure-relieving cushions as compared to standard foam, specific recommendations as to a preferred make/model of cushion for use within general hospital settings are not supported at this time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity–Thai version Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1