通过循证德尔菲小组和定制SEIR模型评估公共卫生干预措施对遏制SARS-CoV-2传播的影响

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2
Bernd Brüggenjürgen, Hans-Peter Stricker, Lilian Krist, Miriam Ortiz, Thomas Reinhold, Stephanie Roll, Gabriele Rotter, Beate Weikert, Miriam Wiese-Posselt, Stefan N Willich
{"title":"通过循证德尔菲小组和定制SEIR模型评估公共卫生干预措施对遏制SARS-CoV-2传播的影响","authors":"Bernd Brüggenjürgen,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Stricker,&nbsp;Lilian Krist,&nbsp;Miriam Ortiz,&nbsp;Thomas Reinhold,&nbsp;Stephanie Roll,&nbsp;Gabriele Rotter,&nbsp;Beate Weikert,&nbsp;Miriam Wiese-Posselt,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich","doi":"10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To use a Delphi-panel-based assessment of the effectiveness of different non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in order to retrospectively approximate and to prospectively predict the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progression via a SEIR model (susceptible, exposed, infectious, removed).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach to elicit the impact of NPIs on the SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate R<sub>0</sub> in Germany. Effectiveness was defined as the product of efficacy and compliance. A discrete, deterministic SEIR model with time step of 1 day, a latency period of 1.8 days, duration of infectiousness of 5 days, and a share of the total population of 15% assumed to be protected by immunity was developed in order to estimate the impact of selected NPI measures on the course of the pandemic. The model was populated with the Delphi-panel results and varied in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Efficacy and compliance estimates for the three most effective NPIs were as follows: test and isolate 49% (efficacy)/78% (compliance), keeping distance 42%/74%, personal protection masks (cloth masks or other face masks) 33%/79%. Applying all NPI effectiveness estimates to the SEIR model resulted in a valid replication of reported occurrence of the German SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A combination of four NPIs at consented compliance rates might curb the CoViD-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Employing an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach can support SARS-CoV-2 modelling. Future curbing scenarios require a combination of NPIs. A Delphi-panel-based NPI assessment and modelling might support public health policy decision making by informing sequence and number of needed public health measures.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of public health interventions to curb SARS-CoV-2 spread assessed by an evidence-educated Delphi panel and tailored SEIR model.\",\"authors\":\"Bernd Brüggenjürgen,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Stricker,&nbsp;Lilian Krist,&nbsp;Miriam Ortiz,&nbsp;Thomas Reinhold,&nbsp;Stephanie Roll,&nbsp;Gabriele Rotter,&nbsp;Beate Weikert,&nbsp;Miriam Wiese-Posselt,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To use a Delphi-panel-based assessment of the effectiveness of different non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in order to retrospectively approximate and to prospectively predict the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progression via a SEIR model (susceptible, exposed, infectious, removed).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach to elicit the impact of NPIs on the SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate R<sub>0</sub> in Germany. Effectiveness was defined as the product of efficacy and compliance. A discrete, deterministic SEIR model with time step of 1 day, a latency period of 1.8 days, duration of infectiousness of 5 days, and a share of the total population of 15% assumed to be protected by immunity was developed in order to estimate the impact of selected NPI measures on the course of the pandemic. The model was populated with the Delphi-panel results and varied in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Efficacy and compliance estimates for the three most effective NPIs were as follows: test and isolate 49% (efficacy)/78% (compliance), keeping distance 42%/74%, personal protection masks (cloth masks or other face masks) 33%/79%. Applying all NPI effectiveness estimates to the SEIR model resulted in a valid replication of reported occurrence of the German SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A combination of four NPIs at consented compliance rates might curb the CoViD-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Employing an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach can support SARS-CoV-2 modelling. Future curbing scenarios require a combination of NPIs. A Delphi-panel-based NPI assessment and modelling might support public health policy decision making by informing sequence and number of needed public health measures.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:对不同非药物干预措施(NPI)的有效性进行基于德尔菲小组的评估,以便通过SEIR模型(易感、暴露、感染、移除)回顾性估计和前瞻性预测SARS-CoV-2大流行进展。方法:采用循证德尔菲面板法,探讨新冠病毒对德国SARS-CoV-2传播率R0的影响。疗效定义为疗效与依从性的乘积。建立了一个离散的、确定性的SEIR模型,其时间步长为1天,潜伏期为1.8天,传染性持续时间为5天,假定受免疫保护的人口占总人口的比例为15%,以估计选定的NPI措施对大流行进程的影响。该模型填充了德尔菲面板结果,并在敏感性分析中有所不同。结果:三种最有效的npi的有效性和依从性估计如下:检测和隔离49%(有效性)/78%(依从性),保持距离42%/74%,个人防护口罩(布口罩或其他口罩)33%/79%。将所有NPI有效性估计应用于SEIR模型,结果有效地复制了报告的德国SARS-CoV-2大流行的发生情况。按照商定的合规率,将四项国家行动计划结合起来可能会遏制CoViD-19大流行。结论:采用循证德尔菲面板方法可支持SARS-CoV-2建模。未来的遏制方案需要npi的组合。基于德尔菲小组的新产品导入评估和建模可以通过告知所需公共卫生措施的顺序和数量来支持公共卫生政策决策。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of public health interventions to curb SARS-CoV-2 spread assessed by an evidence-educated Delphi panel and tailored SEIR model.

Aim: To use a Delphi-panel-based assessment of the effectiveness of different non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in order to retrospectively approximate and to prospectively predict the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic progression via a SEIR model (susceptible, exposed, infectious, removed).

Methods: We applied an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach to elicit the impact of NPIs on the SARS-CoV-2 transmission rate R0 in Germany. Effectiveness was defined as the product of efficacy and compliance. A discrete, deterministic SEIR model with time step of 1 day, a latency period of 1.8 days, duration of infectiousness of 5 days, and a share of the total population of 15% assumed to be protected by immunity was developed in order to estimate the impact of selected NPI measures on the course of the pandemic. The model was populated with the Delphi-panel results and varied in sensitivity analyses.

Results: Efficacy and compliance estimates for the three most effective NPIs were as follows: test and isolate 49% (efficacy)/78% (compliance), keeping distance 42%/74%, personal protection masks (cloth masks or other face masks) 33%/79%. Applying all NPI effectiveness estimates to the SEIR model resulted in a valid replication of reported occurrence of the German SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A combination of four NPIs at consented compliance rates might curb the CoViD-19 pandemic.

Conclusion: Employing an evidence-educated Delphi-panel approach can support SARS-CoV-2 modelling. Future curbing scenarios require a combination of NPIs. A Delphi-panel-based NPI assessment and modelling might support public health policy decision making by informing sequence and number of needed public health measures.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01566-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between life satisfaction, personal health, quality of life, and medication adherence among adolescents living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. Self-reported health among immigrants in Luxembourg: insights from a nationally representative sample. Levelling Up for health in towns? Development of a new deprivation index: the 'Stronger Towns Index' and its association with self-rated health and migration in England, between 2001 and 2011. Social networks and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among older adults in the Netherlands. Racial disparities in lifestyle habits and dietary patterns in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1