迈向自然体验与健康理论。

IF 2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ecopsychology Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1089/eco.2022.0005
Linda Powers Tomasso, Jarvis T Chen
{"title":"迈向自然体验与健康理论。","authors":"Linda Powers Tomasso, Jarvis T Chen","doi":"10.1089/eco.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents an integrated theoretical framework to study the socioenvironmental attributes of the nature experience as a basic health behavior. After first reviewing existing literature on theories behind nature exposure, we discuss social cognitive theory (SCT) to explain individual nature experience through the model's triadic dynamic of environment, cognitions, and behaviors. We then expand beyond SCT's focus on the individual to examine structural and societal spheres of influence on nature experience found in ecological systems theory and ecosocial theory. In moving from proximal to distal influences, we identify the core constructs of each theory that may reinforce or deter decisions inclining individuals toward nature engagement. In synthesizing aspects of these three theories, we propose an integrated theoretical framework of nature experience distinguished by three ideas. First, individual-level formative influences in nature pervade higher level ecologies as a learned social behavior. Second, nature experience happens within multiple systems and timepoints. Third, social relationships within historical processes shape contextual factors of the nature experience, resulting in disparities in nature access and nature responses that manifest heterogeneously. Theorizing behind nature experience can inform why this occurs. We offer suggestions for further research to build on the groundwork put forth here: for hypothesizing around present observations, for collecting data to confirm and/or refute parts of the theory, and for further hypothesis generation inspired by the theory to inform the research agenda. In conclusion, we consider the practical implications of theory underlying nature experience as a health behavior relevant to research, interventions, and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46262,"journal":{"name":"Ecopsychology","volume":"14 4","pages":"282-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Theory of Nature Experience and Health.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Powers Tomasso, Jarvis T Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/eco.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article presents an integrated theoretical framework to study the socioenvironmental attributes of the nature experience as a basic health behavior. After first reviewing existing literature on theories behind nature exposure, we discuss social cognitive theory (SCT) to explain individual nature experience through the model's triadic dynamic of environment, cognitions, and behaviors. We then expand beyond SCT's focus on the individual to examine structural and societal spheres of influence on nature experience found in ecological systems theory and ecosocial theory. In moving from proximal to distal influences, we identify the core constructs of each theory that may reinforce or deter decisions inclining individuals toward nature engagement. In synthesizing aspects of these three theories, we propose an integrated theoretical framework of nature experience distinguished by three ideas. First, individual-level formative influences in nature pervade higher level ecologies as a learned social behavior. Second, nature experience happens within multiple systems and timepoints. Third, social relationships within historical processes shape contextual factors of the nature experience, resulting in disparities in nature access and nature responses that manifest heterogeneously. Theorizing behind nature experience can inform why this occurs. We offer suggestions for further research to build on the groundwork put forth here: for hypothesizing around present observations, for collecting data to confirm and/or refute parts of the theory, and for further hypothesis generation inspired by the theory to inform the research agenda. In conclusion, we consider the practical implications of theory underlying nature experience as a health behavior relevant to research, interventions, and policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecopsychology\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"282-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793414/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecopsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecopsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个综合理论框架,以研究作为基本健康行为的自然体验的社会环境属性。首先,我们回顾了有关接触自然背后理论的现有文献,然后讨论了社会认知理论(SCT),通过该模型中环境、认知和行为的三元动态来解释个人的自然体验。然后,我们超越了社会认知理论对个人的关注,研究了生态系统理论和生态社会理论中对自然体验产生影响的结构和社会领域。在从近端影响到远端影响的过程中,我们确定了每种理论的核心结构,这些结构可能会加强或阻止个人参与自然的决定。综合这三种理论的各个方面,我们提出了一个关于自然体验的综合理论框架,该框架由三个观点组成。首先,自然中个人层面的形成性影响作为一种学习型社会行为渗透到更高层次的生态环境中。第二,自然体验发生在多个系统和时间点中。第三,历史进程中的社会关系塑造了自然体验的背景因素,导致了在接触自然和对自然的反应方面的差异,这些差异表现得很不一样。通过对自然体验背后的理论进行分析,可以了解出现这种情况的原因。我们为在此基础上开展进一步研究提出了建议:围绕目前的观察结果提出假设,收集数据以证实和/或反驳部分理论,并在理论的启发下进一步提出假设,为研究议程提供信息。最后,我们考虑了自然体验作为健康行为的基础理论对研究、干预和政策的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a Theory of Nature Experience and Health.

This article presents an integrated theoretical framework to study the socioenvironmental attributes of the nature experience as a basic health behavior. After first reviewing existing literature on theories behind nature exposure, we discuss social cognitive theory (SCT) to explain individual nature experience through the model's triadic dynamic of environment, cognitions, and behaviors. We then expand beyond SCT's focus on the individual to examine structural and societal spheres of influence on nature experience found in ecological systems theory and ecosocial theory. In moving from proximal to distal influences, we identify the core constructs of each theory that may reinforce or deter decisions inclining individuals toward nature engagement. In synthesizing aspects of these three theories, we propose an integrated theoretical framework of nature experience distinguished by three ideas. First, individual-level formative influences in nature pervade higher level ecologies as a learned social behavior. Second, nature experience happens within multiple systems and timepoints. Third, social relationships within historical processes shape contextual factors of the nature experience, resulting in disparities in nature access and nature responses that manifest heterogeneously. Theorizing behind nature experience can inform why this occurs. We offer suggestions for further research to build on the groundwork put forth here: for hypothesizing around present observations, for collecting data to confirm and/or refute parts of the theory, and for further hypothesis generation inspired by the theory to inform the research agenda. In conclusion, we consider the practical implications of theory underlying nature experience as a health behavior relevant to research, interventions, and policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecopsychology
Ecopsychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Promoting Mental Health Through Engagement With Urban Nature: A Successful Pilot Test of The “Liga-te à Terra!” Intervention Correction to: The Meaning of the Physical Environment in Child and Adolescent Therapy: A Qualitative Study of the Outdoor Care Retreat by Hauge et al. Ecopsychology 2023;15(3):244–258; doi: 10.1089/eco.2022.0087 Nature Relatedness May Play a Protective Role and Contribute to Eco-Distress Adolescents' Climate Anxiety Is Related to Participation in Pro-Environmental Movements Through Social Media Usage: Boys Show Greater Associations Than Girls Rosalind Franklin Society Proudly Announces the 2022 Award Recipient for Ecopsychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1