COVID-19后患者的物理治疗评估:奥地利和南蒂罗尔物理治疗师目前使用的测量仪器。

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1186/s40945-022-00147-0
Claudia Spiegl, Natalia Schiefermeier-Mach, Erika Schifferegger, Claudia Wiederin, Barbara Scheiber
{"title":"COVID-19后患者的物理治疗评估:奥地利和南蒂罗尔物理治疗师目前使用的测量仪器。","authors":"Claudia Spiegl,&nbsp;Natalia Schiefermeier-Mach,&nbsp;Erika Schifferegger,&nbsp;Claudia Wiederin,&nbsp;Barbara Scheiber","doi":"10.1186/s40945-022-00147-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of standardized assessments in physiotherapeutic practice strongly supports diagnostic and treatment plans. Previous studies reported insufficient usage of standardized assessments due to lack of time, lack of knowledge, lack of resources and other barriers. Physiotherapy in outpatient settings became essential for the rehabilitation of patients with post COVID-19 condition but it remains unknown to what extent assessments are implemented into the evaluation of these patients. In this study, we explored the current use and barriers regarding the implementation of physiotherapeutic assessments to evaluate patients with post COVID-19 condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among 180 physiotherapists working in outpatient settings in Austria and South Tyrol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of physiotherapists (88%) indicated that standardized assessments are useful, though less than a fifth of participants actually implement assessments in practice. Among implementation barriers, \"insufficient experience\" (41.8%) and \"lack of knowledge\" (36.6%) were mentioned most often. Concerning specific post COVID-19 assessments, the evaluation of \"physical and respiratory function\", \"quality of life\" and \"activities of daily living\" were stated to be of particular relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed a low implementation rate and identified the main barriers regarding the non-usage of standardized assessments for post COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (UMIT TIROL), and the Research Committee for Scientific Ethical Questions granted approval for the survey (RCSEQ, Hall in Tirol, Austria, Number 2834).</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473730/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with post COVID-19 condition: current use of measuring instruments by physiotherapists working in Austria and South Tyrol.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Spiegl,&nbsp;Natalia Schiefermeier-Mach,&nbsp;Erika Schifferegger,&nbsp;Claudia Wiederin,&nbsp;Barbara Scheiber\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40945-022-00147-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of standardized assessments in physiotherapeutic practice strongly supports diagnostic and treatment plans. Previous studies reported insufficient usage of standardized assessments due to lack of time, lack of knowledge, lack of resources and other barriers. Physiotherapy in outpatient settings became essential for the rehabilitation of patients with post COVID-19 condition but it remains unknown to what extent assessments are implemented into the evaluation of these patients. In this study, we explored the current use and barriers regarding the implementation of physiotherapeutic assessments to evaluate patients with post COVID-19 condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among 180 physiotherapists working in outpatient settings in Austria and South Tyrol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of physiotherapists (88%) indicated that standardized assessments are useful, though less than a fifth of participants actually implement assessments in practice. Among implementation barriers, \\\"insufficient experience\\\" (41.8%) and \\\"lack of knowledge\\\" (36.6%) were mentioned most often. Concerning specific post COVID-19 assessments, the evaluation of \\\"physical and respiratory function\\\", \\\"quality of life\\\" and \\\"activities of daily living\\\" were stated to be of particular relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed a low implementation rate and identified the main barriers regarding the non-usage of standardized assessments for post COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (UMIT TIROL), and the Research Committee for Scientific Ethical Questions granted approval for the survey (RCSEQ, Hall in Tirol, Austria, Number 2834).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00147-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00147-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:物理治疗实践中标准化评估的实施有力地支持了诊断和治疗计划。以前的研究报告说,由于缺乏时间、缺乏知识、缺乏资源和其他障碍,标准化评估的使用不足。门诊物理治疗对于COVID-19后患者的康复至关重要,但目前尚不清楚在这些患者的评估中实施了多大程度的评估。在这项研究中,我们探讨了目前使用物理治疗评估来评估COVID-19后病情的患者的使用和障碍。方法:横断面在线调查进行了180名物理治疗师在门诊设置工作在奥地利和南蒂罗尔。结果:大多数物理治疗师(88%)表示标准化评估是有用的,尽管不到五分之一的参与者在实践中实际实施评估。在实施障碍中,“经验不足”(41.8%)和“缺乏知识”(36.6%)被提及最多。关于COVID-19后的具体评估,据称对“身体和呼吸功能”、“生活质量”和“日常生活活动”的评估特别相关。结论:我们的研究揭示了COVID-19后患者不使用标准化评估的执行率低,并确定了主要障碍。试验登记:卫生科学和卫生技术私立大学(UMIT TIROL)和科学伦理问题研究委员会批准了该调查(RCSEQ,奥地利蒂罗尔大厅,2834号)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physiotherapeutic evaluation of patients with post COVID-19 condition: current use of measuring instruments by physiotherapists working in Austria and South Tyrol.

Background: The implementation of standardized assessments in physiotherapeutic practice strongly supports diagnostic and treatment plans. Previous studies reported insufficient usage of standardized assessments due to lack of time, lack of knowledge, lack of resources and other barriers. Physiotherapy in outpatient settings became essential for the rehabilitation of patients with post COVID-19 condition but it remains unknown to what extent assessments are implemented into the evaluation of these patients. In this study, we explored the current use and barriers regarding the implementation of physiotherapeutic assessments to evaluate patients with post COVID-19 condition.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among 180 physiotherapists working in outpatient settings in Austria and South Tyrol.

Results: The majority of physiotherapists (88%) indicated that standardized assessments are useful, though less than a fifth of participants actually implement assessments in practice. Among implementation barriers, "insufficient experience" (41.8%) and "lack of knowledge" (36.6%) were mentioned most often. Concerning specific post COVID-19 assessments, the evaluation of "physical and respiratory function", "quality of life" and "activities of daily living" were stated to be of particular relevance.

Conclusions: Our study revealed a low implementation rate and identified the main barriers regarding the non-usage of standardized assessments for post COVID-19 patients.

Trial registration: The Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (UMIT TIROL), and the Research Committee for Scientific Ethical Questions granted approval for the survey (RCSEQ, Hall in Tirol, Austria, Number 2834).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hip microinstability and its association with femoroacetabular impingement: A scoping review. Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective. The psychometric properties of the modified fear of falling avoidance behavior questionnaire in Parkinson's disease and older adults. Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Implementation of community physiotherapy in primary care: one-year results of an on-call physiotherapy service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1