JCBE社论

Deb Eldridge
{"title":"JCBE社论","authors":"Deb Eldridge","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This JCBE issue is the fourth and final issue in Volume 5 and closes out 2020. I want to thank everyone for their continued support of the journal during this unprecedented year of a global pandemic. I wish all good things to our authors, reviewers, associate editors, editorial board, publisher, and readers in 2021!</p><p>This issue has five articles, a book review, and a special editorial that represent a broad range of insights into Competency-Based Education (CBE) and Learning (CBL) from diverse perspectives, methods, and settings. The first manuscript, <i>Making sense of K-12 competency-based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019</i>, comes from Dr. Carla Evans and her colleagues at the National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. The article presents barriers and facilitators to outcomes, all of which were mixed. As a result, the authors suggest that the field should coalesce around a continuum of CBE practices. As an aside, there are a number of excellent tables that synthesize the studies the authors reviewed, the factors that affect CBE implementation, and the impact of CBE elements on outcomes which are solid resources for all of us interested in CBE.</p><p><i>Comparing goals to outcomes for graduates of a competency-based education program</i> comes to JCBE from Dr. Michelle Navarre Cleary at College Unbound. The author explores preprogram goals identified in the areas of personal, professional, and community, or social, goals and compares them with the graduates’ reported outcomes. The results underscore the value of competency-based education in achieving personal and professional goals. Details of the methodology and inclusion of the survey offer opportunities for replication in diverse contexts.</p><p>Drs. Melissa Bowman Foster and Christopher Jones at Winston-Salem State University explore the effects of delivery methods on the development of competency levels in their manuscript, <i>The effects of competency-based education delivery methods on competency level: A quantitative study</i>. Focused on the developing competency levels of 15 graduate students in a Masters of Healthcare Administration (MHA) program, their manuscript suggests that CBE delivery models are effective in supporting increased levels of competency.</p><p>An editorial by Mr. Ben Mayfield of Western Governors University serves as a section break between the research presented in the previous three articles and the original research, case study, and book review that follow. <i>Aligning postsecondary institutions to external standards with relational databases</i> is a technical piece with practical applications. CBE institutions, often queried about how competencies and standards are related, will find ample information to “make their case” and answer curricular and other queries with the database example that Mr. Mayfield provides.</p><p><i>Competency-based learning (CBL)</i>: <i>Developing a competency-based geometry methods course</i> by Drs. Lee and Pant illuminates how CBL is being implemented in geometry methods. Their focus adds to the professional knowledge base about CBE/CBL design, assessment, and evaluation and how it can be implemented at the course level to good effect.</p><p>A case study by Dr. Daniel Friedrich at the University of Heidelberg rounds out the studies in this issue with a new perspective. <i>Effectiveness of class peer review under varied multiple review designs: A teaching method with homeschooling format</i> highlights an aspect of JCBE’s scope that is rarely included, the JCBE subtitle of <i>Innovative practices, policies, and structures on learning sciences and outcomes</i>. Implementing a variety of methods for peer review of a business management essay, Dr. Friedrich proposes hypotheses about subject matter knowledge acquisition, self-assessed competency, autonomy, social involvement, learning, and so on. The work has implications for online CBE and for the integration of peer review as a teaching innovation developing students’ competency.</p><p>Wrapping up this issue Dr. Thomas Gauthier reviews the Hoffman and Collins (Eds.) edited book (2020) entitled <i>Teaching Students about the World of Work: A challenge to postsecondary educators</i>. Focused on his perspectives on the need for colleges to be more work- and employer-infused, Gauthier’s review sets the stage for the special issue of JCBE to be published in March 2021: <i>The Future of Learning and Work</i>.</p><p>My hope is that these manuscripts contribute to the global conversation about CBE. We have much to learn from each other, many stories to tell of the work we are doing, and many examples of new work that can enhance teaching and learning everywhere. To Volume 6 in 2021 and beyond!</p>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1231","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial for JCBE\",\"authors\":\"Deb Eldridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This JCBE issue is the fourth and final issue in Volume 5 and closes out 2020. I want to thank everyone for their continued support of the journal during this unprecedented year of a global pandemic. I wish all good things to our authors, reviewers, associate editors, editorial board, publisher, and readers in 2021!</p><p>This issue has five articles, a book review, and a special editorial that represent a broad range of insights into Competency-Based Education (CBE) and Learning (CBL) from diverse perspectives, methods, and settings. The first manuscript, <i>Making sense of K-12 competency-based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019</i>, comes from Dr. Carla Evans and her colleagues at the National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. The article presents barriers and facilitators to outcomes, all of which were mixed. As a result, the authors suggest that the field should coalesce around a continuum of CBE practices. As an aside, there are a number of excellent tables that synthesize the studies the authors reviewed, the factors that affect CBE implementation, and the impact of CBE elements on outcomes which are solid resources for all of us interested in CBE.</p><p><i>Comparing goals to outcomes for graduates of a competency-based education program</i> comes to JCBE from Dr. Michelle Navarre Cleary at College Unbound. The author explores preprogram goals identified in the areas of personal, professional, and community, or social, goals and compares them with the graduates’ reported outcomes. The results underscore the value of competency-based education in achieving personal and professional goals. Details of the methodology and inclusion of the survey offer opportunities for replication in diverse contexts.</p><p>Drs. Melissa Bowman Foster and Christopher Jones at Winston-Salem State University explore the effects of delivery methods on the development of competency levels in their manuscript, <i>The effects of competency-based education delivery methods on competency level: A quantitative study</i>. Focused on the developing competency levels of 15 graduate students in a Masters of Healthcare Administration (MHA) program, their manuscript suggests that CBE delivery models are effective in supporting increased levels of competency.</p><p>An editorial by Mr. Ben Mayfield of Western Governors University serves as a section break between the research presented in the previous three articles and the original research, case study, and book review that follow. <i>Aligning postsecondary institutions to external standards with relational databases</i> is a technical piece with practical applications. CBE institutions, often queried about how competencies and standards are related, will find ample information to “make their case” and answer curricular and other queries with the database example that Mr. Mayfield provides.</p><p><i>Competency-based learning (CBL)</i>: <i>Developing a competency-based geometry methods course</i> by Drs. Lee and Pant illuminates how CBL is being implemented in geometry methods. Their focus adds to the professional knowledge base about CBE/CBL design, assessment, and evaluation and how it can be implemented at the course level to good effect.</p><p>A case study by Dr. Daniel Friedrich at the University of Heidelberg rounds out the studies in this issue with a new perspective. <i>Effectiveness of class peer review under varied multiple review designs: A teaching method with homeschooling format</i> highlights an aspect of JCBE’s scope that is rarely included, the JCBE subtitle of <i>Innovative practices, policies, and structures on learning sciences and outcomes</i>. Implementing a variety of methods for peer review of a business management essay, Dr. Friedrich proposes hypotheses about subject matter knowledge acquisition, self-assessed competency, autonomy, social involvement, learning, and so on. The work has implications for online CBE and for the integration of peer review as a teaching innovation developing students’ competency.</p><p>Wrapping up this issue Dr. Thomas Gauthier reviews the Hoffman and Collins (Eds.) edited book (2020) entitled <i>Teaching Students about the World of Work: A challenge to postsecondary educators</i>. Focused on his perspectives on the need for colleges to be more work- and employer-infused, Gauthier’s review sets the stage for the special issue of JCBE to be published in March 2021: <i>The Future of Learning and Work</i>.</p><p>My hope is that these manuscripts contribute to the global conversation about CBE. We have much to learn from each other, many stories to tell of the work we are doing, and many examples of new work that can enhance teaching and learning everywhere. To Volume 6 in 2021 and beyond!</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1231\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期JCBE是第五卷的第四期也是最后一期,将于2020年结束。我要感谢大家在这前所未有的全球大流行的一年里继续支持该杂志。祝我们的作者、审稿人、副编辑、编委会、出版商和读者在2021年一切顺利!本期有五篇文章、一篇书评和一篇特别社论,从不同的角度、方法和环境对能力教育(CBE)和学习(CBL)进行了广泛的见解。第一份手稿《理解K-12基于能力的教育:2000年至2019年实施和成果研究的系统文献综述》来自国家教育评估改进中心的卡拉·埃文斯博士和她的同事。这篇文章提出了影响结果的障碍和促进因素,所有这些都是混合的。因此,作者建议该领域应该围绕连续的CBE实践进行合并。顺便说一句,有许多优秀的表格综合了作者所回顾的研究,影响CBE实施的因素,以及CBE元素对结果的影响,这些表格对我们所有对CBE感兴趣的人来说都是可靠的资源。将能力教育项目毕业生的目标与结果进行比较,来自College Unbound的Michelle Navarre Cleary博士。作者探讨了在个人、专业、社区或社会等领域确定的计划前目标,并将其与毕业生报告的结果进行了比较。结果强调了能力为基础的教育在实现个人和职业目标的价值。方法的细节和调查的内容提供了在不同情况下复制的机会。温斯顿-塞勒姆州立大学的梅丽莎·鲍曼·福斯特和克里斯托弗·琼斯在他们的手稿《基于能力的教育交付方法对能力水平的影响:一项定量研究》中探讨了交付方法对能力水平发展的影响。他们的论文聚焦于医疗管理硕士(MHA)项目中15名研究生的发展能力水平,表明CBE交付模式在支持提高能力水平方面是有效的。西部州长大学(Western Governors University)的本·梅菲尔德(Ben Mayfield)先生的一篇社论作为前三篇文章中的研究与随后的原始研究、案例研究和书评之间的一段休息。通过关系数据库使高等教育机构与外部标准保持一致是一项具有实际应用的技术工作。经常被问及能力和标准之间的关系的CBE机构将找到充足的信息来“证明自己的观点”,并通过梅菲尔德提供的数据库示例回答课程和其他问题。基于能力的学习(CBL):开发基于能力的几何方法课程。Lee和Pant阐明了CBL是如何在几何方法中实现的。他们的重点增加了CBE/CBL设计,评估和评估的专业知识基础,以及如何在课程层面实施它以取得良好效果。海德堡大学的丹尼尔·弗里德里希博士的一项案例研究以一种新的视角完善了这一问题的研究。不同多重评审设计下班级同伴评审的有效性:一种采用在家教学形式的教学方法突出了JCBE范围中很少包括的一个方面,JCBE的副标题是关于学习科学和成果的创新实践、政策和结构。Friedrich博士采用多种方法对一篇商业管理论文进行同行评审,他提出了关于主题知识获取、自我评估能力、自主性、社会参与、学习等方面的假设。本研究对线上CBE及整合同行评议作为一种教学创新发展学生能力有启示意义。托马斯·戈蒂尔博士回顾了霍夫曼和柯林斯(编辑)编辑的书(2020年),题为《教学生关于工作的世界:对高等教育工作者的挑战》。Gauthier的评论着眼于他对大学需要更多工作和雇主注入的观点,为将于2021年3月出版的JCBE特刊:学习和工作的未来奠定了基础。我希望这些手稿有助于全球关于CBE的讨论。我们有很多东西可以相互学习,有很多故事可以讲述我们正在做的工作,还有很多新工作的例子可以促进各地的教与学。到2021年及以后的第6卷!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial for JCBE

This JCBE issue is the fourth and final issue in Volume 5 and closes out 2020. I want to thank everyone for their continued support of the journal during this unprecedented year of a global pandemic. I wish all good things to our authors, reviewers, associate editors, editorial board, publisher, and readers in 2021!

This issue has five articles, a book review, and a special editorial that represent a broad range of insights into Competency-Based Education (CBE) and Learning (CBL) from diverse perspectives, methods, and settings. The first manuscript, Making sense of K-12 competency-based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019, comes from Dr. Carla Evans and her colleagues at the National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. The article presents barriers and facilitators to outcomes, all of which were mixed. As a result, the authors suggest that the field should coalesce around a continuum of CBE practices. As an aside, there are a number of excellent tables that synthesize the studies the authors reviewed, the factors that affect CBE implementation, and the impact of CBE elements on outcomes which are solid resources for all of us interested in CBE.

Comparing goals to outcomes for graduates of a competency-based education program comes to JCBE from Dr. Michelle Navarre Cleary at College Unbound. The author explores preprogram goals identified in the areas of personal, professional, and community, or social, goals and compares them with the graduates’ reported outcomes. The results underscore the value of competency-based education in achieving personal and professional goals. Details of the methodology and inclusion of the survey offer opportunities for replication in diverse contexts.

Drs. Melissa Bowman Foster and Christopher Jones at Winston-Salem State University explore the effects of delivery methods on the development of competency levels in their manuscript, The effects of competency-based education delivery methods on competency level: A quantitative study. Focused on the developing competency levels of 15 graduate students in a Masters of Healthcare Administration (MHA) program, their manuscript suggests that CBE delivery models are effective in supporting increased levels of competency.

An editorial by Mr. Ben Mayfield of Western Governors University serves as a section break between the research presented in the previous three articles and the original research, case study, and book review that follow. Aligning postsecondary institutions to external standards with relational databases is a technical piece with practical applications. CBE institutions, often queried about how competencies and standards are related, will find ample information to “make their case” and answer curricular and other queries with the database example that Mr. Mayfield provides.

Competency-based learning (CBL): Developing a competency-based geometry methods course by Drs. Lee and Pant illuminates how CBL is being implemented in geometry methods. Their focus adds to the professional knowledge base about CBE/CBL design, assessment, and evaluation and how it can be implemented at the course level to good effect.

A case study by Dr. Daniel Friedrich at the University of Heidelberg rounds out the studies in this issue with a new perspective. Effectiveness of class peer review under varied multiple review designs: A teaching method with homeschooling format highlights an aspect of JCBE’s scope that is rarely included, the JCBE subtitle of Innovative practices, policies, and structures on learning sciences and outcomes. Implementing a variety of methods for peer review of a business management essay, Dr. Friedrich proposes hypotheses about subject matter knowledge acquisition, self-assessed competency, autonomy, social involvement, learning, and so on. The work has implications for online CBE and for the integration of peer review as a teaching innovation developing students’ competency.

Wrapping up this issue Dr. Thomas Gauthier reviews the Hoffman and Collins (Eds.) edited book (2020) entitled Teaching Students about the World of Work: A challenge to postsecondary educators. Focused on his perspectives on the need for colleges to be more work- and employer-infused, Gauthier’s review sets the stage for the special issue of JCBE to be published in March 2021: The Future of Learning and Work.

My hope is that these manuscripts contribute to the global conversation about CBE. We have much to learn from each other, many stories to tell of the work we are doing, and many examples of new work that can enhance teaching and learning everywhere. To Volume 6 in 2021 and beyond!

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring secondary teachers' perspectives on implementing competency-based education The impact of student recognition of excellence to student outcome in a competency-based educational model Issue Information JCBE editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1