基于能力的学习(CBL):开发一个基于能力的几何方法课程

Joohi Lee PhD, Mohan Pant PhD
{"title":"基于能力的学习(CBL):开发一个基于能力的几何方法课程","authors":"Joohi Lee PhD,&nbsp;Mohan Pant PhD","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of competencybased course (Conceptual Geometry). In addition, this paper presents the procedures of developing competency-based course which include mapping out competencies of the course, developing a set of assessment instruments (e.g., diagonal, pre-and post-unit assessments, CBL comprehensive pre-and post-assessments).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred seventy-nine graduate students who enrolled in a 5-week Conceptual Geometry online course participated in this study. During the session, three sets of assessments were administered to assess the baseline of student knowledge (diagonal assessment), effectiveness (comprehensive pre-and post-assessments, and student content knowledge (5 sets of pre-and post-unit assessments).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study showed that implementing an online CBL course is feasible and effective at a course level. Students showed higher scores on all of the post-unit assessments (<i>M</i> = 95.45, <i>SD</i> = 4.62) than on the pre-unit assessments (<i>M</i> = 69.42, <i>SD</i> = 7.77). This result supports the increase of student knowledge associated with geometry contents and pedagogy. The post-comprehensive assessment results show an increase of student efficacy in geometry knowledge and skills using CBL course (pre-assessment: <i>M</i> = 4.49, <i>SD</i> = 0.86; and post-assessment: <i>M</i> = 5.14, <i>SD</i> = 0.40) which supports the increase of student efficacy of both content and pedagogical knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1224","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency-based learning (CBL): Developing a competency-based geometry methods course\",\"authors\":\"Joohi Lee PhD,&nbsp;Mohan Pant PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of competencybased course (Conceptual Geometry). In addition, this paper presents the procedures of developing competency-based course which include mapping out competencies of the course, developing a set of assessment instruments (e.g., diagonal, pre-and post-unit assessments, CBL comprehensive pre-and post-assessments).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred seventy-nine graduate students who enrolled in a 5-week Conceptual Geometry online course participated in this study. During the session, three sets of assessments were administered to assess the baseline of student knowledge (diagonal assessment), effectiveness (comprehensive pre-and post-assessments, and student content knowledge (5 sets of pre-and post-unit assessments).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results of this study showed that implementing an online CBL course is feasible and effective at a course level. Students showed higher scores on all of the post-unit assessments (<i>M</i> = 95.45, <i>SD</i> = 4.62) than on the pre-unit assessments (<i>M</i> = 69.42, <i>SD</i> = 7.77). This result supports the increase of student knowledge associated with geometry contents and pedagogy. The post-comprehensive assessment results show an increase of student efficacy in geometry knowledge and skills using CBL course (pre-assessment: <i>M</i> = 4.49, <i>SD</i> = 0.86; and post-assessment: <i>M</i> = 5.14, <i>SD</i> = 0.40) which supports the increase of student efficacy of both content and pedagogical knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1224\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的探讨能力本位课程(概念几何)的可行性和有效性。此外,本文还介绍了开发以能力为基础的课程的程序,包括绘制课程的能力,开发一套评估工具(例如,对角线,单元前和单元后评估,CBL综合前后评估)。方法179名参加了为期5周的概念几何在线课程的研究生参与了本研究。在会议期间,进行了三套评估,以评估学生知识基线(对角评估),有效性(综合前后评估)和学生内容知识(5套前后单元评估)。结果本研究结果表明,在课程层面实施在线CBL课程是可行和有效的。学生在所有单元后评估中的得分(M = 95.45, SD = 4.62)均高于单元前评估(M = 69.42, SD = 7.77)。这一结果支持了学生对几何内容和教学相关知识的增加。综合后评价结果显示,CBL课程提高了学生几何知识和技能的效能感(前评价:M = 4.49, SD = 0.86;和评估后:M = 5.14, SD = 0.40),支持学生对内容和教学知识的有效性的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competency-based learning (CBL): Developing a competency-based geometry methods course

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of competencybased course (Conceptual Geometry). In addition, this paper presents the procedures of developing competency-based course which include mapping out competencies of the course, developing a set of assessment instruments (e.g., diagonal, pre-and post-unit assessments, CBL comprehensive pre-and post-assessments).

Methods

One hundred seventy-nine graduate students who enrolled in a 5-week Conceptual Geometry online course participated in this study. During the session, three sets of assessments were administered to assess the baseline of student knowledge (diagonal assessment), effectiveness (comprehensive pre-and post-assessments, and student content knowledge (5 sets of pre-and post-unit assessments).

Results

The results of this study showed that implementing an online CBL course is feasible and effective at a course level. Students showed higher scores on all of the post-unit assessments (M = 95.45, SD = 4.62) than on the pre-unit assessments (M = 69.42, SD = 7.77). This result supports the increase of student knowledge associated with geometry contents and pedagogy. The post-comprehensive assessment results show an increase of student efficacy in geometry knowledge and skills using CBL course (pre-assessment: M = 4.49, SD = 0.86; and post-assessment: M = 5.14, SD = 0.40) which supports the increase of student efficacy of both content and pedagogical knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring secondary teachers' perspectives on implementing competency-based education The impact of student recognition of excellence to student outcome in a competency-based educational model Issue Information JCBE editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1