小合伙人对联合政府外交政策的影响模式

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS British Journal of Politics & International Relations Pub Date : 2013-07-09 DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.12025
Kai Oppermann, Klaus Brummer
{"title":"小合伙人对联合政府外交政策的影响模式","authors":"Kai Oppermann,&nbsp;Klaus Brummer","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The main contribution of this article is that it:\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Introduces a distinction between different pathways for junior partner influence on the foreign policy of coalition governments;</li>\n \n <li>Provides nuanced insights into the effects of coalition government on foreign policy as well as on the causal mechanisms behind these effects;</li>\n \n <li>Contributes to the ‘unpacking’ of coalitions and the analysis of coalition governance more generally;</li>\n \n <li>Features a comparative analysis of the current coalition governments in the United Kingdom and Germany.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>This article contributes to research on the foreign policy influence of junior partners in coalition governments. In particular, it takes up the call to pay greater attention to different patterns and pathways of such influence. To this purpose, this article distinguishes two types of coalition set-ups for foreign policy making. In the first type, junior partners hold one or more departments in the foreign policy executive, and their foreign policy influence rests on the powers that controlling ministries in the field brings. In the second type, junior partners do not hold any department in foreign affairs, and their influence comes from their ability to constrain the discretion of the senior partner in foreign policy. The article exemplifies its theoretical contentions in comparative case studies on the current coalition governments in Germany and the UK, which represent the first and second type respectively.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"16 4","pages":"555-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12025","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Junior Partner Influence on the Foreign Policy of Coalition Governments\",\"authors\":\"Kai Oppermann,&nbsp;Klaus Brummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-856X.12025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The main contribution of this article is that it:\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Introduces a distinction between different pathways for junior partner influence on the foreign policy of coalition governments;</li>\\n \\n <li>Provides nuanced insights into the effects of coalition government on foreign policy as well as on the causal mechanisms behind these effects;</li>\\n \\n <li>Contributes to the ‘unpacking’ of coalitions and the analysis of coalition governance more generally;</li>\\n \\n <li>Features a comparative analysis of the current coalition governments in the United Kingdom and Germany.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>This article contributes to research on the foreign policy influence of junior partners in coalition governments. In particular, it takes up the call to pay greater attention to different patterns and pathways of such influence. To this purpose, this article distinguishes two types of coalition set-ups for foreign policy making. In the first type, junior partners hold one or more departments in the foreign policy executive, and their foreign policy influence rests on the powers that controlling ministries in the field brings. In the second type, junior partners do not hold any department in foreign affairs, and their influence comes from their ability to constrain the discretion of the senior partner in foreign policy. The article exemplifies its theoretical contentions in comparative case studies on the current coalition governments in Germany and the UK, which represent the first and second type respectively.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"555-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12025\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

本文的主要贡献在于:介绍了小合伙人影响联合政府外交政策的不同途径的区别;对联合政府对外交政策的影响以及这些影响背后的因果机制提供了细致入微的见解;有助于联盟的“拆解”和更普遍的联盟治理分析;对英国和德国目前的联合政府进行了比较分析。本文有助于研究联合政府中初级合伙人对外交政策的影响。特别是,它要求更多地注意这种影响的不同模式和途径。为此,本文区分了两种类型的外交政策制定联盟。在第一种类型中,初级合伙人在外交政策执行部门拥有一个或多个部门,他们的外交政策影响力取决于控制该领域部委所带来的权力。在第二种类型中,初级合伙人在外交事务中没有任何部门,他们的影响力来自于他们约束高级合伙人在外交政策上的自由裁量权的能力。本文通过对德国和英国两国当前联合政府的比较案例研究来阐述其理论主张,德国和英国分别代表第一和第二种联合政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of Junior Partner Influence on the Foreign Policy of Coalition Governments

The main contribution of this article is that it:

  • Introduces a distinction between different pathways for junior partner influence on the foreign policy of coalition governments;
  • Provides nuanced insights into the effects of coalition government on foreign policy as well as on the causal mechanisms behind these effects;
  • Contributes to the ‘unpacking’ of coalitions and the analysis of coalition governance more generally;
  • Features a comparative analysis of the current coalition governments in the United Kingdom and Germany.

This article contributes to research on the foreign policy influence of junior partners in coalition governments. In particular, it takes up the call to pay greater attention to different patterns and pathways of such influence. To this purpose, this article distinguishes two types of coalition set-ups for foreign policy making. In the first type, junior partners hold one or more departments in the foreign policy executive, and their foreign policy influence rests on the powers that controlling ministries in the field brings. In the second type, junior partners do not hold any department in foreign affairs, and their influence comes from their ability to constrain the discretion of the senior partner in foreign policy. The article exemplifies its theoretical contentions in comparative case studies on the current coalition governments in Germany and the UK, which represent the first and second type respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Crisis politics of dehumanisation during COVID-19: A framework for mapping the social processes through which dehumanisation undermines human dignity. Britain's COVID-19 battle: The role of political leaders in shaping the responses to the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation. Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels. 'The Pope's own hand outstretched': Holy See diplomacy as a hybrid mode of diplomatic agency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1