重建加州罗素市的过去:“城市可能已经消失,但记忆永存”

Megan Wilkinson
{"title":"重建加州罗素市的过去:“城市可能已经消失,但记忆永存”","authors":"Megan Wilkinson","doi":"10.1111/apaa.12158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Russell City, California was once a small farming settlement located near San Francisco Bay. Its population increased and demographics changed during the 1940s, when African American and Latinx families migrated to the area and became the town's majority. The hamlet was never incorporated and lacked basic utilities, yet Russell Cityans self-governed, provided civic safety services, established churches and businesses, and sealed financial deals between neighbors. In the 1950s, however, surrounding areas began considering Russell City a blight. Newspaper articles reinforced this idea, while simultaneously detailing governmental attempts to impede Russell City's improvement efforts. In 1963, Alameda County began the forced relocation of Russell's tenants via a redevelopment project. Residents protested to no avail, and by 1968 the town was destroyed. The area is now an industrial park.</p>\n <p>Contemporary archaeology methods like archival research, oral history, material analysis, photography, and mapping are essential to understand Russell City's past. Using these approaches also enables former residents to cognitively bridge past and present, contributes to forming individual identities, fortifies community solidarity, and exposes the paradox of how living in Russell City was experienced by townspeople compared to how it was viewed by those outside its perimeters. Lastly, documenting Russell Cityans’ experiences and mapping the town are acts that confront the race and class-based systems that not only shaped their lives as well as others in similar communities across the United States, but continue to affect marginalized peoples today.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100116,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association","volume":"33 1","pages":"73-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5 Reconstructing Russell City, California's Past: “The City May Be Gone, But the Memories Live On”\",\"authors\":\"Megan Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apaa.12158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Russell City, California was once a small farming settlement located near San Francisco Bay. Its population increased and demographics changed during the 1940s, when African American and Latinx families migrated to the area and became the town's majority. The hamlet was never incorporated and lacked basic utilities, yet Russell Cityans self-governed, provided civic safety services, established churches and businesses, and sealed financial deals between neighbors. In the 1950s, however, surrounding areas began considering Russell City a blight. Newspaper articles reinforced this idea, while simultaneously detailing governmental attempts to impede Russell City's improvement efforts. In 1963, Alameda County began the forced relocation of Russell's tenants via a redevelopment project. Residents protested to no avail, and by 1968 the town was destroyed. The area is now an industrial park.</p>\\n <p>Contemporary archaeology methods like archival research, oral history, material analysis, photography, and mapping are essential to understand Russell City's past. Using these approaches also enables former residents to cognitively bridge past and present, contributes to forming individual identities, fortifies community solidarity, and exposes the paradox of how living in Russell City was experienced by townspeople compared to how it was viewed by those outside its perimeters. Lastly, documenting Russell Cityans’ experiences and mapping the town are acts that confront the race and class-based systems that not only shaped their lives as well as others in similar communities across the United States, but continue to affect marginalized peoples today.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"73-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apaa.12158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apaa.12158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

加州罗素市曾经是旧金山湾附近的一个小型农业定居点。20世纪40年代,当非裔美国人和拉丁裔家庭移民到该地区并成为该镇的主要人口时,人口增长和人口结构发生了变化。这个小村庄从未被合并,也缺乏基本的公用事业,但罗素城人自治,提供公民安全服务,建立教堂和企业,并在邻居之间达成金融交易。然而,在20世纪50年代,周边地区开始认为罗素城已经破败不堪。报纸上的文章强化了这一观点,同时详细描述了政府试图阻碍罗素市的改善努力。1963年,阿拉米达县开始通过重建项目强制搬迁罗素的租户。居民们的抗议无济于事,到1968年,小镇被摧毁了。这个地区现在是一个工业园区。当代考古方法,如档案研究、口述历史、材料分析、摄影和制图,对于了解罗素市的过去至关重要。使用这些方法也使以前的居民能够在认知上架起过去和现在的桥梁,有助于形成个人身份,加强社区团结,并揭示了罗素城居民的生活经历与周边居民的看法之间的矛盾。最后,记录罗素城市人的经历,绘制城市地图,这些都是面对种族和阶级制度的行为,这些制度不仅塑造了他们的生活,也塑造了美国各地类似社区的其他人,而且继续影响着今天的边缘化人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5 Reconstructing Russell City, California's Past: “The City May Be Gone, But the Memories Live On”

Russell City, California was once a small farming settlement located near San Francisco Bay. Its population increased and demographics changed during the 1940s, when African American and Latinx families migrated to the area and became the town's majority. The hamlet was never incorporated and lacked basic utilities, yet Russell Cityans self-governed, provided civic safety services, established churches and businesses, and sealed financial deals between neighbors. In the 1950s, however, surrounding areas began considering Russell City a blight. Newspaper articles reinforced this idea, while simultaneously detailing governmental attempts to impede Russell City's improvement efforts. In 1963, Alameda County began the forced relocation of Russell's tenants via a redevelopment project. Residents protested to no avail, and by 1968 the town was destroyed. The area is now an industrial park.

Contemporary archaeology methods like archival research, oral history, material analysis, photography, and mapping are essential to understand Russell City's past. Using these approaches also enables former residents to cognitively bridge past and present, contributes to forming individual identities, fortifies community solidarity, and exposes the paradox of how living in Russell City was experienced by townspeople compared to how it was viewed by those outside its perimeters. Lastly, documenting Russell Cityans’ experiences and mapping the town are acts that confront the race and class-based systems that not only shaped their lives as well as others in similar communities across the United States, but continue to affect marginalized peoples today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 7. Mapping land use with integrated environmental archaeological datasets Finding Fields: The Archaeology of Agricultural Landscapes Chapter 1. The state of the field: Emerging approaches to the archaeology of agricultural landscapes Chapter 2. Stone by stone: Women's quotidian farm labor and the construction of the Khutwaneng farmscape in Bokoni, South Africa Chapter 8. Isotopic evidence for protohistoric field locations in northeastern Illinois
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1