评估非洲主要河流流域的环境条件,作为流域健康的替代指标

Ashbindu Singh, Amadou Dieye, Mark Finco
{"title":"评估非洲主要河流流域的环境条件,作为流域健康的替代指标","authors":"Ashbindu Singh,&nbsp;Amadou Dieye,&nbsp;Mark Finco","doi":"10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b> There is a growing recognition of the importance of transboundary shared natural resources. However, with limited resources, international policymakers need to be able to prioritize regions before allocating resources and addressing transboundary problems. River basins are perhaps the most natural transboundary division and, as such, provide an ecological framework for environmental assessments. The health of watersheds that are divided by political boundaries are at particular risk due to differential land management practices within each watershed. In Africa, more than any other continent, over 60% of the geographical area is a transboundary watershed. In this article, a comparative study of the five major basins in Africa—the Congo, Chad, Nile, Niger, and Zambezi—has been carried out using consistent geospatial data sets at 1-km resolution. Population, land cover type, and protected areas were used to assess the current status, characteristic differences, and impending pressure on river basin resources for each watershed. In addition, a focused study within the Nile River basin is used to compare the particular differences between countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":100392,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Health","volume":"5 4","pages":"265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Environmental Conditions of Major River Basins in Africa as Surrogates for Watershed Health\",\"authors\":\"Ashbindu Singh,&nbsp;Amadou Dieye,&nbsp;Mark Finco\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b> There is a growing recognition of the importance of transboundary shared natural resources. However, with limited resources, international policymakers need to be able to prioritize regions before allocating resources and addressing transboundary problems. River basins are perhaps the most natural transboundary division and, as such, provide an ecological framework for environmental assessments. The health of watersheds that are divided by political boundaries are at particular risk due to differential land management practices within each watershed. In Africa, more than any other continent, over 60% of the geographical area is a transboundary watershed. In this article, a comparative study of the five major basins in Africa—the Congo, Chad, Nile, Niger, and Zambezi—has been carried out using consistent geospatial data sets at 1-km resolution. Population, land cover type, and protected areas were used to assess the current status, characteristic differences, and impending pressure on river basin resources for each watershed. In addition, a focused study within the Nile River basin is used to compare the particular differences between countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"265-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1526-0992.1999.09945.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

人们越来越认识到跨界共享自然资源的重要性。然而,由于资源有限,国际政策制定者需要能够在分配资源和解决跨界问题之前优先考虑区域。河流流域也许是最自然的跨界划分,因此为环境评价提供了一个生态框架。由于每个流域内不同的土地管理做法,被政治边界分割的流域的健康尤其面临风险。在非洲,超过60%的地理区域是跨界分水岭,这一比例超过任何其他大陆。本文采用1公里分辨率的一致地理空间数据集,对非洲五大盆地(刚果、乍得、尼罗河、尼日尔和赞比西河)进行了对比研究。利用人口、土地覆盖类型和保护区对流域资源现状、特征差异和即将面临的压力进行评估。此外,在尼罗河流域内进行了一项重点研究,以比较各国之间的具体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Environmental Conditions of Major River Basins in Africa as Surrogates for Watershed Health

ABSTRACT There is a growing recognition of the importance of transboundary shared natural resources. However, with limited resources, international policymakers need to be able to prioritize regions before allocating resources and addressing transboundary problems. River basins are perhaps the most natural transboundary division and, as such, provide an ecological framework for environmental assessments. The health of watersheds that are divided by political boundaries are at particular risk due to differential land management practices within each watershed. In Africa, more than any other continent, over 60% of the geographical area is a transboundary watershed. In this article, a comparative study of the five major basins in Africa—the Congo, Chad, Nile, Niger, and Zambezi—has been carried out using consistent geospatial data sets at 1-km resolution. Population, land cover type, and protected areas were used to assess the current status, characteristic differences, and impending pressure on river basin resources for each watershed. In addition, a focused study within the Nile River basin is used to compare the particular differences between countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW BOOK REVIEW Logical Interrelations between Four Sustainability Parameters: Stability, Continuation, Longevity, and Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1