政治信任与美国公众对自由贸易的支持。

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Behavior Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x
David Macdonald
{"title":"政治信任与美国公众对自由贸易的支持。","authors":"David Macdonald","doi":"10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates over trade liberalization vs. protectionism have becoming increasingly relevant as the world moves through a contentious era of economic globalization. This is particularly true in the United States, where an elite consensus on the merits of free trade has fractured in recent years. While we know a good deal about the economic and cultural determinants of trade opinion, we know little about how attitudes toward government may matter. Here, I address this oversight by examining the relationship between political trust and trade support. I do this with cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies (ANES) and the National Annenberg Election Surveys (NAES), and a survey experiment fielded through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Overall, I find that there is a positive and substantively significant relationship between political trust and mass support for free and open \"pro-trade\" policies. I attribute this to greater citizen confidence that government will pursue trade deals in the national interest and mitigate any perceived risks associated with free trade. These findings help us to better understand the determinants of public opinion toward trade policy and underscore the consequences of political trust.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Trust and American Public Support for Free Trade.\",\"authors\":\"David Macdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debates over trade liberalization vs. protectionism have becoming increasingly relevant as the world moves through a contentious era of economic globalization. This is particularly true in the United States, where an elite consensus on the merits of free trade has fractured in recent years. While we know a good deal about the economic and cultural determinants of trade opinion, we know little about how attitudes toward government may matter. Here, I address this oversight by examining the relationship between political trust and trade support. I do this with cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies (ANES) and the National Annenberg Election Surveys (NAES), and a survey experiment fielded through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Overall, I find that there is a positive and substantively significant relationship between political trust and mass support for free and open \\\"pro-trade\\\" policies. I attribute this to greater citizen confidence that government will pursue trade deals in the national interest and mitigate any perceived risks associated with free trade. These findings help us to better understand the determinants of public opinion toward trade policy and underscore the consequences of political trust.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着世界进入一个充满争议的经济全球化时代,关于贸易自由化与保护主义的争论变得日益重要。美国的情况尤其如此,近年来,精英们对自由贸易的优点达成的共识已经破裂。虽然我们对贸易观点的经济和文化决定因素了解颇多,但对政府态度的影响却知之甚少。在此,我将通过研究政治信任与贸易支持之间的关系来解决这一问题。为此,我使用了《美国全国选举研究》(ANES)和《全国安纳伯格选举调查》(NAES)的横截面数据和面板数据,以及通过亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)进行的一项调查实验。总体而言,我发现政治信任与群众对自由开放的 "亲贸易 "政策的支持之间存在着积极的、实质性的重要关系。我将此归因于公民更相信政府会为了国家利益推行贸易协议,并降低任何与自由贸易相关的预期风险。这些发现有助于我们更好地理解公众对贸易政策看法的决定因素,并强调了政治信任的后果:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Trust and American Public Support for Free Trade.

Debates over trade liberalization vs. protectionism have becoming increasingly relevant as the world moves through a contentious era of economic globalization. This is particularly true in the United States, where an elite consensus on the merits of free trade has fractured in recent years. While we know a good deal about the economic and cultural determinants of trade opinion, we know little about how attitudes toward government may matter. Here, I address this oversight by examining the relationship between political trust and trade support. I do this with cross-sectional and panel data from the American National Election Studies (ANES) and the National Annenberg Election Surveys (NAES), and a survey experiment fielded through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Overall, I find that there is a positive and substantively significant relationship between political trust and mass support for free and open "pro-trade" policies. I attribute this to greater citizen confidence that government will pursue trade deals in the national interest and mitigate any perceived risks associated with free trade. These findings help us to better understand the determinants of public opinion toward trade policy and underscore the consequences of political trust.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Electability: Candidate (and Voter) Ideology, Race, and Gender Risk Preferences in the Delegation Process Support for Gun Reform in the United States: The Interactive Relationship Between Partisanship and Trust in the Federal Government Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court Racial and Partisan Social Information Prompts Campaign Giving: Evidence from a Field Experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1