黑人和白人老年人颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度估计值与测量值之间的关系:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究。

The journal of cardiovascular aging Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-04 DOI:10.20517/jca.2021.22
Kevin Heffernan, Lee Stoner, Michelle L Meyer, Adam Keifer, Lauren Bates, Patricia Pagan Lassalle, Erik D Hanson, Masahiro Horiuchi, Erin D Michos, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kunihiro Matsushita, Timothy M Hughes, Hirofumi Tanaka
{"title":"黑人和白人老年人颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度估计值与测量值之间的关系:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究。","authors":"Kevin Heffernan, Lee Stoner, Michelle L Meyer, Adam Keifer, Lauren Bates, Patricia Pagan Lassalle, Erik D Hanson, Masahiro Horiuchi, Erin D Michos, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kunihiro Matsushita, Timothy M Hughes, Hirofumi Tanaka","doi":"10.20517/jca.2021.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aortic stiffness offers important insight into vascular aging and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The referent measure of aortic stiffness is carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). cfPWV can be estimated (ePWV) from age and mean arterial pressure. Few studies have directly compared the association of ePWV to measured cfPWV, particularly in non-White adults. Moreover, whether ePWV and cfPWV correlate similarly with CVD risk remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>(1) To estimate the strength of the agreement between ePWV and cfPWV in both Black and White older adults; and (2) to compare the associations of ePWV and cfPWV with CVD risk factors and determine whether these associations were consistent across races.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We evaluated 4478 [75.2 (SD 5.0) years] Black and White older adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. cfPWV was measured using an automated pulse waveform analyzer. ePWV was derived from an equation based on age and mean arterial pressure. Association and agreement between the two measurements were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>), standard error of estimate (SEE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Associations between traditional risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV were evaluated using linear mixed regression models. We observed weak correlations between ePWV and cfPWV within White adults (<i>r</i> = 0.36) and Black adults (<i>r</i> = 0.31). The mean bias for Bland-Altman analysis was low at -0.17 m/s (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.09). However, the inspection of the Bland-Altman plots indicated systematic bias (<i>P</i> < 0.001), which was consistent across race strata. The SEE, or typical absolute error, was 2.8 m/s suggesting high variability across measures. In models adjusted for sex, prevalent diabetes, the number of prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and medication count, both cfPWV and ePWV were positively associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI) and smoking status in White adults (<i>P</i> < 0.05). cfPWV and ePWV were not associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose in Black adults, while both measures were negatively associated with BMI in Black adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest a weak association between ePWV and cfPWV in older White and Black adults from ARIC. There were similar weak associations between CVD risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV in White adults with subtle differences in associations in Black adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":75051,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiovascular aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between estimated and measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in older Black and White adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Heffernan, Lee Stoner, Michelle L Meyer, Adam Keifer, Lauren Bates, Patricia Pagan Lassalle, Erik D Hanson, Masahiro Horiuchi, Erin D Michos, Anna Kucharska-Newton, Kunihiro Matsushita, Timothy M Hughes, Hirofumi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/jca.2021.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Aortic stiffness offers important insight into vascular aging and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The referent measure of aortic stiffness is carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). cfPWV can be estimated (ePWV) from age and mean arterial pressure. Few studies have directly compared the association of ePWV to measured cfPWV, particularly in non-White adults. Moreover, whether ePWV and cfPWV correlate similarly with CVD risk remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>(1) To estimate the strength of the agreement between ePWV and cfPWV in both Black and White older adults; and (2) to compare the associations of ePWV and cfPWV with CVD risk factors and determine whether these associations were consistent across races.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We evaluated 4478 [75.2 (SD 5.0) years] Black and White older adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. cfPWV was measured using an automated pulse waveform analyzer. ePWV was derived from an equation based on age and mean arterial pressure. Association and agreement between the two measurements were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>), standard error of estimate (SEE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Associations between traditional risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV were evaluated using linear mixed regression models. We observed weak correlations between ePWV and cfPWV within White adults (<i>r</i> = 0.36) and Black adults (<i>r</i> = 0.31). The mean bias for Bland-Altman analysis was low at -0.17 m/s (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.09). However, the inspection of the Bland-Altman plots indicated systematic bias (<i>P</i> < 0.001), which was consistent across race strata. The SEE, or typical absolute error, was 2.8 m/s suggesting high variability across measures. In models adjusted for sex, prevalent diabetes, the number of prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and medication count, both cfPWV and ePWV were positively associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI) and smoking status in White adults (<i>P</i> < 0.05). cfPWV and ePWV were not associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose in Black adults, while both measures were negatively associated with BMI in Black adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest a weak association between ePWV and cfPWV in older White and Black adults from ARIC. There were similar weak associations between CVD risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV in White adults with subtle differences in associations in Black adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of cardiovascular aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of cardiovascular aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/jca.2021.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiovascular aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/jca.2021.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:主动脉僵硬度是了解血管老化和心血管疾病(CVD)风险的重要依据。主动脉僵硬度的参考指标是颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(cfPWV)。很少有研究直接比较 ePWV 与测量的 cfPWV 之间的关联,尤其是在非白人成年人中。此外,ePWV 和 cfPWV 是否与心血管疾病风险具有相似的相关性仍有待探索。目的:(1)估计黑人和白人老年人 ePWV 和 cfPWV 之间的一致性强度;(2)比较 ePWV 和 cfPWV 与心血管疾病风险因素的关联,并确定这些关联在不同种族之间是否一致:我们对社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究中的 4478 名[75.2(SD 5.0)岁]黑人和白人老年人进行了评估。采用皮尔逊相关系数 (r)、估计标准误差 (SEE) 和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析法确定两种测量值之间的关联性和一致性。使用线性混合回归模型评估了传统风险因素与 ePWV 和 cfPWV 之间的相关性。我们观察到,在白人成年人(r = 0.36)和黑人成年人(r = 0.31)中,ePWV 和 cfPWV 之间的相关性较弱。Bland-Altman 分析的平均偏差较低,为-0.17 m/s(95%CI:-0.25 至-0.09)。然而,对布兰-阿尔特曼图的检查表明存在系统性偏差(P < 0.001),这在不同种族分层中是一致的。SEE(典型绝对误差)为 2.8 m/s,表明不同测量结果之间存在很大差异。在调整了性别、糖尿病患病率、心血管疾病患病人数和用药次数后的模型中,白人成年人的 cfPWV 和 ePWV 与心率、甘油三酯和空腹血糖呈正相关,而与体重指数(BMI)和吸烟状况呈负相关(P < 0.05);黑人成年人的 cfPWV 和 ePWV 与心率、甘油三酯和空腹血糖无关,而这两项指标与黑人成年人的体重指数呈负相关:结论:研究结果表明,在来自ARIC的老年白人和黑人中,ePWV和cfPWV之间存在微弱的关联。在白人成年人中,心血管疾病风险因素与 ePWV 和 cfPWV 之间存在类似的微弱关联,而在黑人成年人中,两者之间的关联存在细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between estimated and measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in older Black and White adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study.

Introduction: Aortic stiffness offers important insight into vascular aging and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The referent measure of aortic stiffness is carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). cfPWV can be estimated (ePWV) from age and mean arterial pressure. Few studies have directly compared the association of ePWV to measured cfPWV, particularly in non-White adults. Moreover, whether ePWV and cfPWV correlate similarly with CVD risk remains unexplored.

Aim: (1) To estimate the strength of the agreement between ePWV and cfPWV in both Black and White older adults; and (2) to compare the associations of ePWV and cfPWV with CVD risk factors and determine whether these associations were consistent across races.

Methods and results: We evaluated 4478 [75.2 (SD 5.0) years] Black and White older adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. cfPWV was measured using an automated pulse waveform analyzer. ePWV was derived from an equation based on age and mean arterial pressure. Association and agreement between the two measurements were determined using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), standard error of estimate (SEE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Associations between traditional risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV were evaluated using linear mixed regression models. We observed weak correlations between ePWV and cfPWV within White adults (r = 0.36) and Black adults (r = 0.31). The mean bias for Bland-Altman analysis was low at -0.17 m/s (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.09). However, the inspection of the Bland-Altman plots indicated systematic bias (P < 0.001), which was consistent across race strata. The SEE, or typical absolute error, was 2.8 m/s suggesting high variability across measures. In models adjusted for sex, prevalent diabetes, the number of prevalent cardiovascular diseases, and medication count, both cfPWV and ePWV were positively associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI) and smoking status in White adults (P < 0.05). cfPWV and ePWV were not associated with heart rate, triglycerides, and fasting glucose in Black adults, while both measures were negatively associated with BMI in Black adults.

Conclusions: Findings suggest a weak association between ePWV and cfPWV in older White and Black adults from ARIC. There were similar weak associations between CVD risk factors with ePWV and cfPWV in White adults with subtle differences in associations in Black adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiomyocyte senescence and the potential therapeutic role of senolytics in the heart Dysfunctional mitochondria elicit bioenergetic decline in the aged heart. Targeting vascular senescence in cardiovascular disease with aging. The role of brown adipose tissue in mediating healthful longevity. From vitality to vulnerability: the impact of oxygen on cardiac function and regeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1