基于脑电功率和可解释机器学习的冲动性分类。

IF 6.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE International Journal of Neural Systems Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1142/S0129065723500065
Philippa Hüpen, Himanshu Kumar, Aliaksandra Shymanskaya, Ramakrishnan Swaminathan, Ute Habel
{"title":"基于脑电功率和可解释机器学习的冲动性分类。","authors":"Philippa Hüpen,&nbsp;Himanshu Kumar,&nbsp;Aliaksandra Shymanskaya,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Swaminathan,&nbsp;Ute Habel","doi":"10.1142/S0129065723500065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct often associated with unfavorable outcomes. Previous studies have implicated several electroencephalography (EEG) indices to impulsiveness, but results are heterogeneous and inconsistent. Using a data-driven approach, we identified EEG power features for the prediction of self-reported impulsiveness. To this end, EEG signals of 56 individuals (18 low impulsive, 20 intermediate impulsive, 18 high impulsive) were recorded during a risk-taking task. Extracted EEG power features from 62 electrodes were fed into various machine learning classifiers to identify the most relevant band. Robustness of the classifier was varied by stratified [Formula: see text]-fold cross validation. Alpha and beta band power showed best performance in the classification of impulsiveness (accuracy = 95.18% and 95.11%, respectively) using a random forest classifier. Subsequently, a sequential bidirectional feature selection algorithm was used to estimate the most relevant electrode sites. Results show that as little as 10 electrodes are sufficient to reliably classify impulsiveness using alpha band power ([Formula: see text]-measure = 94.50%). Finally, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis approach was employed to reveal the individual EEG features that contributed most to the model's output. Results indicate that frontal as well as posterior midline alpha power seems to be of most importance for the classification of impulsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50305,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neural Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impulsivity Classification Using EEG Power and Explainable Machine Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Philippa Hüpen,&nbsp;Himanshu Kumar,&nbsp;Aliaksandra Shymanskaya,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Swaminathan,&nbsp;Ute Habel\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0129065723500065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct often associated with unfavorable outcomes. Previous studies have implicated several electroencephalography (EEG) indices to impulsiveness, but results are heterogeneous and inconsistent. Using a data-driven approach, we identified EEG power features for the prediction of self-reported impulsiveness. To this end, EEG signals of 56 individuals (18 low impulsive, 20 intermediate impulsive, 18 high impulsive) were recorded during a risk-taking task. Extracted EEG power features from 62 electrodes were fed into various machine learning classifiers to identify the most relevant band. Robustness of the classifier was varied by stratified [Formula: see text]-fold cross validation. Alpha and beta band power showed best performance in the classification of impulsiveness (accuracy = 95.18% and 95.11%, respectively) using a random forest classifier. Subsequently, a sequential bidirectional feature selection algorithm was used to estimate the most relevant electrode sites. Results show that as little as 10 electrodes are sufficient to reliably classify impulsiveness using alpha band power ([Formula: see text]-measure = 94.50%). Finally, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis approach was employed to reveal the individual EEG features that contributed most to the model's output. Results indicate that frontal as well as posterior midline alpha power seems to be of most importance for the classification of impulsiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neural Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065723500065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065723500065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

冲动是一个多维度的构念,通常与不利的结果有关。以往的研究已经将几种脑电图(EEG)指标与冲动性联系起来,但结果是不一致的。使用数据驱动的方法,我们确定了用于预测自我报告冲动的脑电图功率特征。为此,对56名受试者(18名低冲动、20名中冲动、18名高冲动)在冒险任务中的脑电图信号进行了记录。将提取的62个电极的脑电功率特征输入到各种机器学习分类器中,以识别最相关的频段。分类器的稳健性通过分层[公式:见文本]-交叉验证来改变。随机森林分类器对冲动性的分类准确率分别为95.18%和95.11%。随后,使用顺序双向特征选择算法来估计最相关的电极位置。结果表明,只需10个电极就足以使用α波段功率可靠地分类脉冲([公式:见文本]-测量= 94.50%)。最后,采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析方法揭示对模型输出贡献最大的单个EEG特征。结果表明,额中线和后中线α能量对冲动性分类最重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impulsivity Classification Using EEG Power and Explainable Machine Learning.

Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct often associated with unfavorable outcomes. Previous studies have implicated several electroencephalography (EEG) indices to impulsiveness, but results are heterogeneous and inconsistent. Using a data-driven approach, we identified EEG power features for the prediction of self-reported impulsiveness. To this end, EEG signals of 56 individuals (18 low impulsive, 20 intermediate impulsive, 18 high impulsive) were recorded during a risk-taking task. Extracted EEG power features from 62 electrodes were fed into various machine learning classifiers to identify the most relevant band. Robustness of the classifier was varied by stratified [Formula: see text]-fold cross validation. Alpha and beta band power showed best performance in the classification of impulsiveness (accuracy = 95.18% and 95.11%, respectively) using a random forest classifier. Subsequently, a sequential bidirectional feature selection algorithm was used to estimate the most relevant electrode sites. Results show that as little as 10 electrodes are sufficient to reliably classify impulsiveness using alpha band power ([Formula: see text]-measure = 94.50%). Finally, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis approach was employed to reveal the individual EEG features that contributed most to the model's output. Results indicate that frontal as well as posterior midline alpha power seems to be of most importance for the classification of impulsiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Neural Systems
International Journal of Neural Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
28.80%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neural Systems is a monthly, rigorously peer-reviewed transdisciplinary journal focusing on information processing in both natural and artificial neural systems. Special interests include machine learning, computational neuroscience and neurology. The journal prioritizes innovative, high-impact articles spanning multiple fields, including neurosciences and computer science and engineering. It adopts an open-minded approach to this multidisciplinary field, serving as a platform for novel ideas and enhanced understanding of collective and cooperative phenomena in computationally capable systems.
期刊最新文献
Wavelet Transform, Reconstructed Phase Space, and Deep Learning Neural Networks for EEG-based Schizophrenia Detection Unsupervised EEG-Based Seizure Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models Incremental Confidence Sampling with Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation A model with dopamine depletion in basal ganglia and cerebellum predicts changes in thalamocortical beta oscillations Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using Spatiotemporal Feature Fusion on EEG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1