官方统计文化。德国移民融入量化测量中的象征性支配和 "资产阶级 "同化。

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Theory and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s11186-022-09503-2
Martin Petzke
{"title":"官方统计文化。德国移民融入量化测量中的象征性支配和 \"资产阶级 \"同化。","authors":"Martin Petzke","doi":"10.1007/s11186-022-09503-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While cultural sociology has recently made a comeback in research on social inequality both in the context of poverty studies and studies of immigrant integration, it has rarely investigated how particular constructions of the problem of socioeconomic mobility are themselves culturally situated. The article addresses this neglect by investigating the problematization of disadvantaged lives within the relational framework of Bourdieu's cultural theory of the state. Here, the state exercises symbolic violence by transforming one arbitrary cultural standpoint in social space into a universal standard, or a taken-for-granted \"doxa,\" against which other cultural positions can only come off as deficient. The article extends this perspective by addressing the role of official statistics in this process. Taking Germany's official monitoring of the socioeconomic integration of immigrants as its case and drawing from document analysis, interviews, ethnographic observation, and data from the German General Social Survey, the article shows how such statistical instruments of the welfare state in fact tacitly universalize a model of the good life particular to civil servants, the very constructors of the monitors, as a benchmark for immigrant integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48137,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Society","volume":"52 2","pages":"213-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The culture of official statistics. Symbolic domination and \\\"bourgeois\\\" assimilation in quantitative measurements of immigrant integration in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Petzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11186-022-09503-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While cultural sociology has recently made a comeback in research on social inequality both in the context of poverty studies and studies of immigrant integration, it has rarely investigated how particular constructions of the problem of socioeconomic mobility are themselves culturally situated. The article addresses this neglect by investigating the problematization of disadvantaged lives within the relational framework of Bourdieu's cultural theory of the state. Here, the state exercises symbolic violence by transforming one arbitrary cultural standpoint in social space into a universal standard, or a taken-for-granted \\\"doxa,\\\" against which other cultural positions can only come off as deficient. The article extends this perspective by addressing the role of official statistics in this process. Taking Germany's official monitoring of the socioeconomic integration of immigrants as its case and drawing from document analysis, interviews, ethnographic observation, and data from the German General Social Survey, the article shows how such statistical instruments of the welfare state in fact tacitly universalize a model of the good life particular to civil servants, the very constructors of the monitors, as a benchmark for immigrant integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Society\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"213-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10033626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09503-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09503-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然文化社会学近来在贫困研究和移民融入研究中卷土重来,对社会不平等问题进行研究,但却很少研究社会经济流动性问题的特定建构本身是如何具有文化内涵的。本文通过在布迪厄的国家文化理论的关系框架内研究弱势生活的问题化,来解决这一被忽视的问题。在这里,国家通过将社会空间中一种任意的文化立场转化为一种普遍标准或一种理所当然的 "doxa "来行使象征性暴力,而与之相对的其他文化立场只能被视为有缺陷。文章通过探讨官方统计在这一过程中的作用,对这一观点进行了延伸。文章以德国官方对移民融入社会经济生活的监测为例,通过文件分析、访谈、人种学观察和德国社会综合调查的数据,说明这种福利国家的统计工具如何在事实上默许了公务员(监测者的构建者)所特有的美好生活模式的普遍化,并将其作为移民融入社会的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The culture of official statistics. Symbolic domination and "bourgeois" assimilation in quantitative measurements of immigrant integration in Germany.

While cultural sociology has recently made a comeback in research on social inequality both in the context of poverty studies and studies of immigrant integration, it has rarely investigated how particular constructions of the problem of socioeconomic mobility are themselves culturally situated. The article addresses this neglect by investigating the problematization of disadvantaged lives within the relational framework of Bourdieu's cultural theory of the state. Here, the state exercises symbolic violence by transforming one arbitrary cultural standpoint in social space into a universal standard, or a taken-for-granted "doxa," against which other cultural positions can only come off as deficient. The article extends this perspective by addressing the role of official statistics in this process. Taking Germany's official monitoring of the socioeconomic integration of immigrants as its case and drawing from document analysis, interviews, ethnographic observation, and data from the German General Social Survey, the article shows how such statistical instruments of the welfare state in fact tacitly universalize a model of the good life particular to civil servants, the very constructors of the monitors, as a benchmark for immigrant integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Society
Theory and Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Theory and Society is a forum for the international community of scholars that publishes theoretically-informed analyses of social processes. It opens its pages to authors working at the frontiers of social analysis, regardless of discipline. Its subject matter ranges from prehistory to contemporary affairs, from treatments of single individuals and national societies to world culture, from discussions of theory to methodological critique, from First World to Third World - but always in the effort to bring together theory, criticism and concrete observation.
期刊最新文献
Dating in captivity: creativity, digital affordance, and the organization of interaction in online dating during quarantine The theory and function of Marxian water rent in the United States Correction to: Reimagining modern politics in the European mountains: confronting the traditional commons with the neo‑rural conception of the common good What counts as investment? Productive and unproductive expenditures The gates to the profession are open: the alternative institutionalization of data science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1