健康老龄化认知的多基因指标;大脑测量的作用

Q4 Neuroscience Neuroimage. Reports Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100153
A. Tsapanou , N. Mourtzi , Y. Gu , C. Habeck , D. Belsky , Y. Stern
{"title":"健康老龄化认知的多基因指标;大脑测量的作用","authors":"A. Tsapanou ,&nbsp;N. Mourtzi ,&nbsp;Y. Gu ,&nbsp;C. Habeck ,&nbsp;D. Belsky ,&nbsp;Y. Stern","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified large numbers of genetic variants associated with cognition. However, little is known about how these genetic discoveries impact cognitive aging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted polygenic-index (PGI) analysis of cognitive performance in n = 168 European-ancestry adults aged 20–80. We computed PGIs based on GWAS of cognitive performance in young/middle-aged and older adults. We tested associations of the PGI with cognitive performance, as measured through neuropsychological evaluation. We explored whether these associations were accounted for by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of brain-aging phenotypes: total gray matter volume (GM), cortical thickness (CT), and white matter hyperintensities burden (WMH).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants with higher PGI values performed better on cognitive tests (B = 0.627, SE = 0.196, <em>p</em> = 0.002) (age, sex, and principal components as covariates). Associations remained significant with inclusion of covariates for MRI measures of brain aging; B = 0.439, SE: 0.198, <em>p</em> = 0.028). PGI associations were stronger in young and middle-aged (age&lt;65) as compared to older adults. For further validation, linear regression for Cog PGI and cognition in the fully adjusted model and adding the interaction between age group and Cog PGI, showed significant results (B = 0.892, SE: 0.325, <em>p</em> = 0.007) driven by young and middle-aged adults (B = −0.403, SE: 0.193, <em>p</em> = 0.039). In ancillary analysis, the Cognitive PGI was not associated with any of the brain measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Genetics discovered in GWAS of cognition are associated with cognitive performance in healthy adults across age, but most strongly in young and middle-aged adults. Associations were not explained by brain-structural markers of brain aging. Genetics uncovered in GWAS of cognitive performance may contribute to individual differences established relatively early in life and may not reflect genetic mechanisms of cognitive aging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/26/nihms-1883031.PMC10038095.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polygenic indices for cognition in healthy aging; the role of brain measures\",\"authors\":\"A. Tsapanou ,&nbsp;N. Mourtzi ,&nbsp;Y. Gu ,&nbsp;C. Habeck ,&nbsp;D. Belsky ,&nbsp;Y. Stern\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified large numbers of genetic variants associated with cognition. However, little is known about how these genetic discoveries impact cognitive aging.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted polygenic-index (PGI) analysis of cognitive performance in n = 168 European-ancestry adults aged 20–80. We computed PGIs based on GWAS of cognitive performance in young/middle-aged and older adults. We tested associations of the PGI with cognitive performance, as measured through neuropsychological evaluation. We explored whether these associations were accounted for by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of brain-aging phenotypes: total gray matter volume (GM), cortical thickness (CT), and white matter hyperintensities burden (WMH).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants with higher PGI values performed better on cognitive tests (B = 0.627, SE = 0.196, <em>p</em> = 0.002) (age, sex, and principal components as covariates). Associations remained significant with inclusion of covariates for MRI measures of brain aging; B = 0.439, SE: 0.198, <em>p</em> = 0.028). PGI associations were stronger in young and middle-aged (age&lt;65) as compared to older adults. For further validation, linear regression for Cog PGI and cognition in the fully adjusted model and adding the interaction between age group and Cog PGI, showed significant results (B = 0.892, SE: 0.325, <em>p</em> = 0.007) driven by young and middle-aged adults (B = −0.403, SE: 0.193, <em>p</em> = 0.039). In ancillary analysis, the Cognitive PGI was not associated with any of the brain measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Genetics discovered in GWAS of cognition are associated with cognitive performance in healthy adults across age, but most strongly in young and middle-aged adults. Associations were not explained by brain-structural markers of brain aging. Genetics uncovered in GWAS of cognitive performance may contribute to individual differences established relatively early in life and may not reflect genetic mechanisms of cognitive aging.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/26/nihms-1883031.PMC10038095.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956022000770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956022000770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经发现了大量与认知相关的遗传变异。然而,人们对这些基因发现如何影响认知衰老知之甚少。方法我们对168名20-80岁的欧洲血统成年人的认知表现进行了多基因指数(PGI)分析。我们根据年轻人/中年人和老年人认知表现的GWAS计算PGI。我们通过神经心理学评估测试了PGI和认知表现的相关性。我们探讨了这些关联是否可以通过脑老化表型的磁共振成像(MRI)测量来解释:总灰质体积(GM)、皮层厚度(CT),结果PGI值较高的参与者在认知测试中表现较好(B=0.627,SE=0.196,p=0.002)(年龄、性别和主要成分为协变量)。纳入脑老化MRI测量的协变量后,相关性仍然显著;B=0.439,SE:0.198,p=0.028)。与老年人相比,年轻人和中年人(年龄<65岁)的PGI相关性更强。为了进一步验证,在完全调整的模型中,Cog PGI和认知的线性回归,并添加年龄组和Cog PGI之间的相互作用,显示出由年轻人和中年人驱动的显著结果(B=-0.492,SE:0.325,p=0.007)(B=−0.403,SE:0.193,p=0.039)。在辅助分析中,认知PGI与任何大脑测量无关。结论GWAS中发现的认知遗传学与不同年龄段健康成年人的认知表现有关,但在中青年人中最为明显。大脑衰老的大脑结构标志物并不能解释这种联系。认知表现的GWAS中发现的遗传学可能有助于在生命早期建立的个体差异,并且可能不能反映认知衰老的遗传机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polygenic indices for cognition in healthy aging; the role of brain measures

Background

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified large numbers of genetic variants associated with cognition. However, little is known about how these genetic discoveries impact cognitive aging.

Methods

We conducted polygenic-index (PGI) analysis of cognitive performance in n = 168 European-ancestry adults aged 20–80. We computed PGIs based on GWAS of cognitive performance in young/middle-aged and older adults. We tested associations of the PGI with cognitive performance, as measured through neuropsychological evaluation. We explored whether these associations were accounted for by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of brain-aging phenotypes: total gray matter volume (GM), cortical thickness (CT), and white matter hyperintensities burden (WMH).

Results

Participants with higher PGI values performed better on cognitive tests (B = 0.627, SE = 0.196, p = 0.002) (age, sex, and principal components as covariates). Associations remained significant with inclusion of covariates for MRI measures of brain aging; B = 0.439, SE: 0.198, p = 0.028). PGI associations were stronger in young and middle-aged (age<65) as compared to older adults. For further validation, linear regression for Cog PGI and cognition in the fully adjusted model and adding the interaction between age group and Cog PGI, showed significant results (B = 0.892, SE: 0.325, p = 0.007) driven by young and middle-aged adults (B = −0.403, SE: 0.193, p = 0.039). In ancillary analysis, the Cognitive PGI was not associated with any of the brain measures.

Conclusions

Genetics discovered in GWAS of cognition are associated with cognitive performance in healthy adults across age, but most strongly in young and middle-aged adults. Associations were not explained by brain-structural markers of brain aging. Genetics uncovered in GWAS of cognitive performance may contribute to individual differences established relatively early in life and may not reflect genetic mechanisms of cognitive aging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
期刊最新文献
Neonatal inflammation and near-term white matter microstructure in infants born very preterm Measuring cognitive load in multitasking using mobile fNIRS MRI-guided clustering of patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease using self-organizing maps Evaluating state-based network dynamics in anhedonia Unresponsiveness induced by sevoflurane and propofol is associated with reduced basal forebrain cholinergic nuclei functional connectivity in humans, a pilot exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1