基于儿童无晶状体屈光的人工晶状体度数计算改进公式。

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12723
Mohammad-Reza Jafarinasab, Behrooz Khosravi, Hamed Esfandiari, Sadid Hooshmandi, Kiana Hassanpour
{"title":"基于儿童无晶状体屈光的人工晶状体度数计算改进公式。","authors":"Mohammad-Reza Jafarinasab,&nbsp;Behrooz Khosravi,&nbsp;Hamed Esfandiari,&nbsp;Sadid Hooshmandi,&nbsp;Kiana Hassanpour","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate and optimize the accuracy of aphakic refraction (AR) techniques for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in aphakic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three aphakic eyes of 18 patients who were candidates for secondary IOL implantation were enrolled in the present study. Axial length (AL) measured by optical biometry was used in the biometric formula (SRK-T, Holladay II, and Hoffer-Q). AR and spherical equivalent (SE) were used in two AR-based formulas (Ianchulev, Leccissotti). True power was calculated based on postoperative SE at three months' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the postoperative SE, 13 (40%) eyes were within <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.00 diopters (D) and 22 (66%) were within <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.00 D. Median absolute error (MedAE) was predicted to be 4.4 and 7.3 D with the use of Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas, respectively. The corresponding value was 0.8 D with the biometric formula. All eyes were deemed to have myopic refraction when using the AR-based formulas except one eye with the Ianchulev formula. The coefficient of our modified formula was 1.7 instead of 2.01 in the Ianchulev formula. MedAE with the use of new formulae was 0.5 D and was comparable with the true IOL power (<i>P</i> = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas resulted in a significant myopic surprise in aphakic children aged between 4.5 and 14 years. The modified formula proved to determine a more accurate SE that is comparable with biometric formulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Modified Formula for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Aphakic Refraction in a Pediatric Population.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad-Reza Jafarinasab,&nbsp;Behrooz Khosravi,&nbsp;Hamed Esfandiari,&nbsp;Sadid Hooshmandi,&nbsp;Kiana Hassanpour\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate and optimize the accuracy of aphakic refraction (AR) techniques for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in aphakic children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three aphakic eyes of 18 patients who were candidates for secondary IOL implantation were enrolled in the present study. Axial length (AL) measured by optical biometry was used in the biometric formula (SRK-T, Holladay II, and Hoffer-Q). AR and spherical equivalent (SE) were used in two AR-based formulas (Ianchulev, Leccissotti). True power was calculated based on postoperative SE at three months' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the postoperative SE, 13 (40%) eyes were within <math><mo>±</mo></math> 1.00 diopters (D) and 22 (66%) were within <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.00 D. Median absolute error (MedAE) was predicted to be 4.4 and 7.3 D with the use of Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas, respectively. The corresponding value was 0.8 D with the biometric formula. All eyes were deemed to have myopic refraction when using the AR-based formulas except one eye with the Ianchulev formula. The coefficient of our modified formula was 1.7 instead of 2.01 in the Ianchulev formula. MedAE with the use of new formulae was 0.5 D and was comparable with the true IOL power (<i>P</i> = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas resulted in a significant myopic surprise in aphakic children aged between 4.5 and 14 years. The modified formula proved to determine a more accurate SE that is comparable with biometric formulas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"34-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020791/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i1.12723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨并优化无晶状体屈光度(AR)技术在无晶状体儿童人工晶状体度数计算中的准确性。方法:选取18例无晶状体患者33只眼进行二期人工晶状体植入术。生物识别公式(SRK-T、Holladay II和Hoffer-Q)采用光学生物测定法测量的轴向长度(AL)。两个基于AR的公式(Ianchulev, Leccissotti)采用了AR和球面等效(SE)。根据术后随访3个月的SE计算真功率。结果:术后SE在±1.00屈光度(D)以内的有13只(40%)眼,±2.00屈光度(D)以内的有22只(66%)眼。使用Ianchulev和Leccissotti公式预测的中位绝对误差(MedAE)分别为4.4和7.3 D。用生物识别公式计算对应值为0.8 D。使用基于ar的公式时,除了一只眼睛使用Ianchulev公式外,所有眼睛都被认为是近视屈光。我们修正公式的系数是1.7,而不是Ianchulev公式中的2.01。使用新配方后的人工晶内光度值为0.5 D,与人工晶内真度数相当(P = 0.22)。结论:Ianchulev配方和Leccissotti配方对4.5 ~ 14岁的无晶状体失聪儿童均有显著的近视奇效。经证明,改进后的公式可以确定与生物识别公式相当的更准确的SE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Modified Formula for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Aphakic Refraction in a Pediatric Population.

Purpose: To investigate and optimize the accuracy of aphakic refraction (AR) techniques for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in aphakic children.

Methods: Thirty-three aphakic eyes of 18 patients who were candidates for secondary IOL implantation were enrolled in the present study. Axial length (AL) measured by optical biometry was used in the biometric formula (SRK-T, Holladay II, and Hoffer-Q). AR and spherical equivalent (SE) were used in two AR-based formulas (Ianchulev, Leccissotti). True power was calculated based on postoperative SE at three months' follow-up.

Results: Regarding the postoperative SE, 13 (40%) eyes were within ± 1.00 diopters (D) and 22 (66%) were within ± 2.00 D. Median absolute error (MedAE) was predicted to be 4.4 and 7.3 D with the use of Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas, respectively. The corresponding value was 0.8 D with the biometric formula. All eyes were deemed to have myopic refraction when using the AR-based formulas except one eye with the Ianchulev formula. The coefficient of our modified formula was 1.7 instead of 2.01 in the Ianchulev formula. MedAE with the use of new formulae was 0.5 D and was comparable with the true IOL power (P = 0.22).

Conclusion: Both Ianchulev and Leccissotti formulas resulted in a significant myopic surprise in aphakic children aged between 4.5 and 14 years. The modified formula proved to determine a more accurate SE that is comparable with biometric formulas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1