产科用新型酰胺局麻药

MD Esther M. Yun (Assistant Professor of Anethesiology), MD Warner Meadows (Instructor in Anesthesiology), MD Alan C. Santos (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology)
{"title":"产科用新型酰胺局麻药","authors":"MD Esther M. Yun (Assistant Professor of Anethesiology),&nbsp;MD Warner Meadows (Instructor in Anesthesiology),&nbsp;MD Alan C. Santos (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(98)80078-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For a number of reasons, bupivacaine has become the most frequently used local anaesthetic in obstetric anaesthesia, despite the fact that it has a narrower margin of safety than other local anesthetics. In recent years, advances in technology have made singleisomer formulations of drugs available for clinical use. Generally speaking, the levo stereoisomer of amide local anaesthetic has a lowe rpotential for systemic toxicity than the dextro form of the drug while retaining anaesthetic potency. Ropivacaine (Naropin<sup>®</sup>, Astra Ltd), a homologue of mepivacaine and bupivacaine, has recently been released for use. Its clinical efficacy appears to be quite similar to that of bupivacaine but it has a greater margin of safety. The other drug currently being investigated is levobupivacaine (Chirocaine<sup>®</sup>, Chiroscience Ltd). Both drugs appear to be similar in efficacy to the currently used formulation of bupivacaine; however, they are more costly. Thus, cost-benefit analyses are required to define more clearly their future role in obstetric anaesthesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 461-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(98)80078-3","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8 New amide local anaesthetics for obstetric use\",\"authors\":\"MD Esther M. Yun (Assistant Professor of Anethesiology),&nbsp;MD Warner Meadows (Instructor in Anesthesiology),&nbsp;MD Alan C. Santos (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3552(98)80078-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For a number of reasons, bupivacaine has become the most frequently used local anaesthetic in obstetric anaesthesia, despite the fact that it has a narrower margin of safety than other local anesthetics. In recent years, advances in technology have made singleisomer formulations of drugs available for clinical use. Generally speaking, the levo stereoisomer of amide local anaesthetic has a lowe rpotential for systemic toxicity than the dextro form of the drug while retaining anaesthetic potency. Ropivacaine (Naropin<sup>®</sup>, Astra Ltd), a homologue of mepivacaine and bupivacaine, has recently been released for use. Its clinical efficacy appears to be quite similar to that of bupivacaine but it has a greater margin of safety. The other drug currently being investigated is levobupivacaine (Chirocaine<sup>®</sup>, Chiroscience Ltd). Both drugs appear to be similar in efficacy to the currently used formulation of bupivacaine; however, they are more costly. Thus, cost-benefit analyses are required to define more clearly their future role in obstetric anaesthesia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 461-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(98)80078-3\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355298800783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355298800783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

由于多种原因,布比卡因已成为产科麻醉中最常用的局部麻醉剂,尽管它的安全范围比其他局部麻醉剂要小。近年来,技术的进步使临床使用的药物的单聚体配方。一般来说,酰胺局部麻醉剂的左旋立体异构体在保持麻醉效力的同时,具有较低的全身毒性。罗哌卡因(Naropin®,Astra Ltd)是甲哌卡因和布比卡因的同源物,最近已被释放使用。其临床疗效似乎与布比卡因相当,但具有更大的安全边际。目前正在研究的另一种药物是左布比卡因(Chirocaine®,Chiroscience Ltd)。这两种药物的疗效似乎与目前使用的布比卡因配方相似;然而,它们更昂贵。因此,需要进行成本效益分析,以更清楚地确定它们在产科麻醉中的未来作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8 New amide local anaesthetics for obstetric use

For a number of reasons, bupivacaine has become the most frequently used local anaesthetic in obstetric anaesthesia, despite the fact that it has a narrower margin of safety than other local anesthetics. In recent years, advances in technology have made singleisomer formulations of drugs available for clinical use. Generally speaking, the levo stereoisomer of amide local anaesthetic has a lowe rpotential for systemic toxicity than the dextro form of the drug while retaining anaesthetic potency. Ropivacaine (Naropin®, Astra Ltd), a homologue of mepivacaine and bupivacaine, has recently been released for use. Its clinical efficacy appears to be quite similar to that of bupivacaine but it has a greater margin of safety. The other drug currently being investigated is levobupivacaine (Chirocaine®, Chiroscience Ltd). Both drugs appear to be similar in efficacy to the currently used formulation of bupivacaine; however, they are more costly. Thus, cost-benefit analyses are required to define more clearly their future role in obstetric anaesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy. Contributors to this issue Preface 3 Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1