目标管理及其对出院和外部会诊时专科处方质量的影响

M. Olmo , L. Galvan , J. Capdevila , C. Serna , I. Mangues , J.A. Schoenenberger
{"title":"目标管理及其对出院和外部会诊时专科处方质量的影响","authors":"M. Olmo ,&nbsp;L. Galvan ,&nbsp;J. Capdevila ,&nbsp;C. Serna ,&nbsp;I. Mangues ,&nbsp;J.A. Schoenenberger","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70009-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To verify that implementing a policy of management by objectives, based on collaboration between hospital pharmacy, primary care and specialised medical managers, improves prescription quality indicators in specialised care and reduces unwanted “induced” prescriptions (i.e. those issued by specialists, hospital doctors or the patients themselves) in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A four year quasi-experimental controlled intervention study on prescription at discharge and in outpatient hospital consultations was conducted. In hospital A, a quality cycle was applied: assessment, identifying improvement opportunities, implementing corrective actions and re-assessment. However, it was not applied in control hospital B. The indicators chosen were the percentage of generic medicines prescribed, the percentage of prescriptions for new therapies with no added value and the percentage of prescriptions for ACE inhibitors recommended.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In hospital A, an increase in indicators 1 and 3 has been observed, both being statistically significant, between the last year of intervention and the year previous to intervention. Hospital A managed to reduce indicator 2 to 4.5%, while this indicator increased in hospital B to 8.8%. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference in indicators between the two hospitals has been registered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pay-for-Performance programs in prescription practices of hospital physicians are effective actions to improve quality indicators of medication use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70009-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management by objectives and its impact on specialist prescription quality at discharge and in external consultations\",\"authors\":\"M. Olmo ,&nbsp;L. Galvan ,&nbsp;J. Capdevila ,&nbsp;C. Serna ,&nbsp;I. Mangues ,&nbsp;J.A. Schoenenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70009-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To verify that implementing a policy of management by objectives, based on collaboration between hospital pharmacy, primary care and specialised medical managers, improves prescription quality indicators in specialised care and reduces unwanted “induced” prescriptions (i.e. those issued by specialists, hospital doctors or the patients themselves) in primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A four year quasi-experimental controlled intervention study on prescription at discharge and in outpatient hospital consultations was conducted. In hospital A, a quality cycle was applied: assessment, identifying improvement opportunities, implementing corrective actions and re-assessment. However, it was not applied in control hospital B. The indicators chosen were the percentage of generic medicines prescribed, the percentage of prescriptions for new therapies with no added value and the percentage of prescriptions for ACE inhibitors recommended.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In hospital A, an increase in indicators 1 and 3 has been observed, both being statistically significant, between the last year of intervention and the year previous to intervention. Hospital A managed to reduce indicator 2 to 4.5%, while this indicator increased in hospital B to 8.8%. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference in indicators between the two hospitals has been registered.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pay-for-Performance programs in prescription practices of hospital physicians are effective actions to improve quality indicators of medication use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 58-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(11)70009-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508511700090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证在医院药房、初级保健和专业医疗管理人员合作的基础上实施目标管理政策,提高了专业保健的处方质量指标,减少了初级保健中不需要的"诱导"处方(即由专家、医院医生或患者自己开出的处方)。方法对出院处方和门诊处方进行为期4年的准实验对照干预研究。A医院采用质量循环:评估、识别改进机会、实施纠正措施和重新评估。b医院未采用该方法,选取的指标为仿制药处方占比、无附加值的新疗法处方占比和推荐ACE抑制剂处方占比。结果A医院干预后1年与干预前1年相比,指标1和指标3均有所提高,均有统计学意义。A医院设法将指标2降低到4.5%,而B医院的这一指标提高到8.8%。此外,两家医院的指标在统计上存在显著差异。结论在医院医师处方实践中实施绩效薪酬是提高用药质量指标的有效措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management by objectives and its impact on specialist prescription quality at discharge and in external consultations

Objective

To verify that implementing a policy of management by objectives, based on collaboration between hospital pharmacy, primary care and specialised medical managers, improves prescription quality indicators in specialised care and reduces unwanted “induced” prescriptions (i.e. those issued by specialists, hospital doctors or the patients themselves) in primary care.

Method

A four year quasi-experimental controlled intervention study on prescription at discharge and in outpatient hospital consultations was conducted. In hospital A, a quality cycle was applied: assessment, identifying improvement opportunities, implementing corrective actions and re-assessment. However, it was not applied in control hospital B. The indicators chosen were the percentage of generic medicines prescribed, the percentage of prescriptions for new therapies with no added value and the percentage of prescriptions for ACE inhibitors recommended.

Results

In hospital A, an increase in indicators 1 and 3 has been observed, both being statistically significant, between the last year of intervention and the year previous to intervention. Hospital A managed to reduce indicator 2 to 4.5%, while this indicator increased in hospital B to 8.8%. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference in indicators between the two hospitals has been registered.

Conclusion

Pay-for-Performance programs in prescription practices of hospital physicians are effective actions to improve quality indicators of medication use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity Profile and Adherence to the Pharmacotherapeutic Regimen of Gemcitabine–carboplatin in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Simplification of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Good Choice for Our Patients and the Sustainability of Our Health Care System Effectiveness and Use of Linezolid in Hospitalisation Wards Application of the Technology Web 2.0 in a Drug Information Centre Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1