利用模拟退火提高ERGM起始值

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.002
Christian S. Schmid , David R. Hunter
{"title":"利用模拟退火提高ERGM起始值","authors":"Christian S. Schmid ,&nbsp;David R. Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Much of the theory of estimation for exponential family models, which include exponential-family random graph models (ERGMs) as a special case, is well-established and maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) in particular enjoy many desirable properties. However, in the case of many ERGMs, direct calculation of MLEs is impossible and therefore methods for approximating MLEs and/or alternative estimation methods must be employed. Many MLE approximation algorithms require an alternative estimate as a starting point. The maximum pseudo-likelihood estimator (MPLE) is frequently taken as this starting point. Here, we discuss a potentially large class of such alternatives based on the fact that, unlike the MLE, the MPLE fails to satisfy the so-called “likelihood principle”. This means that different networks may have different MPLEs even if they have the same sufficient statistics. We exploit this fact here to search for improved starting values for approximation-based MLE methods. The method we propose has shown its merit in producing an MLE for a network dataset and model that had defied estimation using all other known methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"76 ","pages":"Pages 209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000679/pdfft?md5=d7d75542cb88c005142ccf9b3261d9d1&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873323000679-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving ERGM starting values using simulated annealing\",\"authors\":\"Christian S. Schmid ,&nbsp;David R. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Much of the theory of estimation for exponential family models, which include exponential-family random graph models (ERGMs) as a special case, is well-established and maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) in particular enjoy many desirable properties. However, in the case of many ERGMs, direct calculation of MLEs is impossible and therefore methods for approximating MLEs and/or alternative estimation methods must be employed. Many MLE approximation algorithms require an alternative estimate as a starting point. The maximum pseudo-likelihood estimator (MPLE) is frequently taken as this starting point. Here, we discuss a potentially large class of such alternatives based on the fact that, unlike the MLE, the MPLE fails to satisfy the so-called “likelihood principle”. This means that different networks may have different MPLEs even if they have the same sufficient statistics. We exploit this fact here to search for improved starting values for approximation-based MLE methods. The method we propose has shown its merit in producing an MLE for a network dataset and model that had defied estimation using all other known methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 209-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000679/pdfft?md5=d7d75542cb88c005142ccf9b3261d9d1&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873323000679-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

指数族模型的许多估计理论,其中包括指数族随机图模型(ergm)作为一种特殊情况,已经建立起来,特别是最大似然估计(MLEs)具有许多理想的性质。然而,在许多ergm的情况下,直接计算最大似然值是不可能的,因此必须采用近似最大似然值和/或替代估计方法。许多最大似然估计算法需要一个替代估计作为起点。极大伪似然估计量(MPLE)常被作为这个起点。在这里,我们基于这样一个事实,即与MLE不同,MPLE不能满足所谓的“似然原则”,讨论了一类潜在的此类替代方案。这意味着不同的网络可能有不同的mple,即使它们有相同的足够的统计数据。我们在这里利用这一事实来为基于近似的MLE方法寻找改进的起始值。我们提出的方法在为网络数据集和模型生成MLE方面显示出其优点,这些数据集和模型使用所有其他已知方法都无法进行估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving ERGM starting values using simulated annealing

Much of the theory of estimation for exponential family models, which include exponential-family random graph models (ERGMs) as a special case, is well-established and maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) in particular enjoy many desirable properties. However, in the case of many ERGMs, direct calculation of MLEs is impossible and therefore methods for approximating MLEs and/or alternative estimation methods must be employed. Many MLE approximation algorithms require an alternative estimate as a starting point. The maximum pseudo-likelihood estimator (MPLE) is frequently taken as this starting point. Here, we discuss a potentially large class of such alternatives based on the fact that, unlike the MLE, the MPLE fails to satisfy the so-called “likelihood principle”. This means that different networks may have different MPLEs even if they have the same sufficient statistics. We exploit this fact here to search for improved starting values for approximation-based MLE methods. The method we propose has shown its merit in producing an MLE for a network dataset and model that had defied estimation using all other known methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1