高中第二语言课堂中高、低水平青少年作家的源性写作

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064
Gillian Baxter, Heike Neumann
{"title":"高中第二语言课堂中高、低水平青少年作家的源性写作","authors":"Gillian Baxter,&nbsp;Heike Neumann","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Writing from sources is a fundamental academic skill that poses a challenge for students at all educational levels. However, few studies have investigated source use in the high-school context. The current study examines the source-based writing of 43 adolescent writers in a high-school second-language (L2) classroom. Students were classified into high- (<em>N</em> = 25) and low-proficiency (<em>N</em><span> = 18) levels based on scores obtained on an integrated writing task. They then completed an additional integrated writing task. Essays were analysed for four variables: amount of source use, accuracy of source ideas, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, and language used to integrate source information. Correlation coefficients suggested a significant relationship between writing scores and certain source-use patterns. Independent samples </span><em>t-</em>tests revealed significant differences between the two proficiency groups for accuracy of source use, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, verbatim copying with no citation, and indirect source use with implicit citation. The findings suggest that although high-school L2 writers are ready to meet certain demands of source-based writing, they require support in source-use subskills. This has implications for the eventual creation of pedagogical interventions designed to guide novice writers at this educational level through the developmental process of achieving effective source-based writing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source-based writing of the high- and low-proficiency adolescent writer in the high-school L2 classroom\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Baxter,&nbsp;Heike Neumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Writing from sources is a fundamental academic skill that poses a challenge for students at all educational levels. However, few studies have investigated source use in the high-school context. The current study examines the source-based writing of 43 adolescent writers in a high-school second-language (L2) classroom. Students were classified into high- (<em>N</em> = 25) and low-proficiency (<em>N</em><span> = 18) levels based on scores obtained on an integrated writing task. They then completed an additional integrated writing task. Essays were analysed for four variables: amount of source use, accuracy of source ideas, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, and language used to integrate source information. Correlation coefficients suggested a significant relationship between writing scores and certain source-use patterns. Independent samples </span><em>t-</em>tests revealed significant differences between the two proficiency groups for accuracy of source use, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, verbatim copying with no citation, and indirect source use with implicit citation. The findings suggest that although high-school L2 writers are ready to meet certain demands of source-based writing, they require support in source-use subskills. This has implications for the eventual creation of pedagogical interventions designed to guide novice writers at this educational level through the developmental process of achieving effective source-based writing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从资料中写作是一项基本的学术技能,对所有教育水平的学生都是一项挑战。然而,很少有研究调查高中背景下的来源使用。本研究调查了43名高中第二语言(L2)课堂上的青少年作家基于源的写作。根据综合写作任务的得分,学生被分为高水平(N = 25)和低水平(N = 18)。然后,他们完成了一项额外的综合写作任务。论文分析了四个变量:来源使用的数量,来源思想的准确性,归因来源作者的彻彻性,以及用于整合来源信息的语言。相关系数表明写作分数与某些来源使用模式之间存在显著关系。独立样本t检验显示,两个熟练程度组在来源使用的准确性、来源作者的完全性、无引用的逐字复制和隐含引用的间接来源使用方面存在显著差异。研究结果表明,尽管高中第二语言作者已经准备好满足基于源的写作的某些要求,但他们需要在源使用子技能方面的支持。这对最终创建教学干预具有启示意义,旨在指导这个教育水平的新手作家通过实现有效的基于源的写作的发展过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Source-based writing of the high- and low-proficiency adolescent writer in the high-school L2 classroom

Writing from sources is a fundamental academic skill that poses a challenge for students at all educational levels. However, few studies have investigated source use in the high-school context. The current study examines the source-based writing of 43 adolescent writers in a high-school second-language (L2) classroom. Students were classified into high- (N = 25) and low-proficiency (N = 18) levels based on scores obtained on an integrated writing task. They then completed an additional integrated writing task. Essays were analysed for four variables: amount of source use, accuracy of source ideas, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, and language used to integrate source information. Correlation coefficients suggested a significant relationship between writing scores and certain source-use patterns. Independent samples t-tests revealed significant differences between the two proficiency groups for accuracy of source use, thoroughness of attribution to source authors, verbatim copying with no citation, and indirect source use with implicit citation. The findings suggest that although high-school L2 writers are ready to meet certain demands of source-based writing, they require support in source-use subskills. This has implications for the eventual creation of pedagogical interventions designed to guide novice writers at this educational level through the developmental process of achieving effective source-based writing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1