左乙拉西坦与苯妥英治疗儿童癫痫持续状态的安全性和有效性比较:荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES CNS & neurological disorders drug targets Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1568007X04666220509215121
Qasem A AlMulihi, Fatimah A AlMuhanna, Mohammed A AlMuhanna, Eman A AlSultan
{"title":"左乙拉西坦与苯妥英治疗儿童癫痫持续状态的安全性和有效性比较:荟萃分析。","authors":"Qasem A AlMulihi,&nbsp;Fatimah A AlMuhanna,&nbsp;Mohammed A AlMuhanna,&nbsp;Eman A AlSultan","doi":"10.2174/1568007X04666220509215121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levetiracetam and phenytoin by evaluating the events of seizure termination and recurrence in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the internet databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to conduct a literature search for the appropriate studies. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio using fixed and random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 15 studies that were eligible for the meta-analysis. The incidence of seizure termination within 24 h was 76.9% for levetiracetam and 70.5% for phenytoin. Levetiracetam had a higher number of seizure termination events than phenytoin (P = 0.005, I<sup>2</sup> = 66%). The incidence of seizure recurrence within 24 h was 10% for levetiracetam and 15.6% for phenytoin. Phenytoin had a significantly higher number of seizure recurrence events than levetiracetam (P = 0.00007, I<sup>2</sup> = 21%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and safety of levetiracetam are superior to that of phenytoin in children with status epilepticus. Large Randomized Controlled Trial studies are needed to confirm the result in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":10456,"journal":{"name":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","volume":"22 5","pages":"745-751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness between Levetiracetam and Phenytoin in the Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Meta- Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qasem A AlMulihi,&nbsp;Fatimah A AlMuhanna,&nbsp;Mohammed A AlMuhanna,&nbsp;Eman A AlSultan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1568007X04666220509215121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levetiracetam and phenytoin by evaluating the events of seizure termination and recurrence in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the internet databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to conduct a literature search for the appropriate studies. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio using fixed and random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 15 studies that were eligible for the meta-analysis. The incidence of seizure termination within 24 h was 76.9% for levetiracetam and 70.5% for phenytoin. Levetiracetam had a higher number of seizure termination events than phenytoin (P = 0.005, I<sup>2</sup> = 66%). The incidence of seizure recurrence within 24 h was 10% for levetiracetam and 15.6% for phenytoin. Phenytoin had a significantly higher number of seizure recurrence events than levetiracetam (P = 0.00007, I<sup>2</sup> = 21%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy and safety of levetiracetam are superior to that of phenytoin in children with status epilepticus. Large Randomized Controlled Trial studies are needed to confirm the result in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"745-751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1568007X04666220509215121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1568007X04666220509215121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价左乙拉西坦和苯妥英在小儿癫痫发作终止和复发中的安全性和有效性。方法:利用互联网数据库PubMed、Embase和Google Scholar进行文献检索,寻找合适的研究。采用固定效应和随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算优势比。结果:我们确定了15项符合meta分析的研究。左乙西坦24 h内癫痫发作终止率为76.9%,苯妥英为70.5%。左乙拉西坦的癫痫终止事件数高于苯妥英(P = 0.005, I2 = 66%)。左乙拉西坦组24 h内癫痫复发率为10%,苯妥英组为15.6%。苯妥英的癫痫复发次数明显高于左乙拉西坦(P = 0.00007, I2 = 21%)。结论:左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫持续状态患儿的疗效和安全性优于苯妥英。需要大型随机对照试验来证实儿童的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness between Levetiracetam and Phenytoin in the Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Meta- Analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levetiracetam and phenytoin by evaluating the events of seizure termination and recurrence in children.

Methods: We used the internet databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to conduct a literature search for the appropriate studies. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio using fixed and random-effects models.

Results: We identified 15 studies that were eligible for the meta-analysis. The incidence of seizure termination within 24 h was 76.9% for levetiracetam and 70.5% for phenytoin. Levetiracetam had a higher number of seizure termination events than phenytoin (P = 0.005, I2 = 66%). The incidence of seizure recurrence within 24 h was 10% for levetiracetam and 15.6% for phenytoin. Phenytoin had a significantly higher number of seizure recurrence events than levetiracetam (P = 0.00007, I2 = 21%).

Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of levetiracetam are superior to that of phenytoin in children with status epilepticus. Large Randomized Controlled Trial studies are needed to confirm the result in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets aims to cover all the latest and outstanding developments on the medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, molecular biology, genomics and biochemistry of contemporary molecular targets involved in neurological and central nervous system (CNS) disorders e.g. disease specific proteins, receptors, enzymes, genes. CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets publishes guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field covering a range of current topics of CNS & neurological drug targets. The journal also accepts for publication original research articles, letters, reviews and drug clinical trial studies. As the discovery, identification, characterization and validation of novel human drug targets for neurological and CNS drug discovery continues to grow; this journal is essential reading for all pharmaceutical scientists involved in drug discovery and development.
期刊最新文献
Choice and Timing of Antithrombotic after Ischemic Stroke, Intracerebral Hemorrhage or Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. New Psychometric Strategies for the Evaluation of Affective, Cognitive, and Psychosocial Functioning in Unipolar versus Bipolar Depression: Impact of Drug Treatment. Curbing Rhes Actions: Mechanism-based Molecular Target for Huntington's Disease and Tauopathies. G Protein-coupled Receptors (GPCRs) as Potential Therapeutics for Psychiatric Disorders. Relation between Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's Disease and SARS-CoV-2 and their Treatment Strategy: A Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1