青少年对受欢迎程度的认知如何变化:衡量受欢迎程度与友谊网络之间的相互作用

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.004
Ana Bravo , Robert W. Krause , Rosario Ortega-Ruiz , Eva M. Romera
{"title":"青少年对受欢迎程度的认知如何变化:衡量受欢迎程度与友谊网络之间的相互作用","authors":"Ana Bravo ,&nbsp;Robert W. Krause ,&nbsp;Rosario Ortega-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Eva M. Romera","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Longitudinal multivariate social network analysis (<em>N</em>=3692 adolescents; 136 classrooms) showed that adolescents were more likely to perceive their friends as popular but did not choose peers that they perceived to be popular as friends. Adolescents aligned their perceptions of popularity with their friends. Adolescents who received many popularity nominations attracted more popularity but not more friendship. Friends of peers seen as popular by an individual were more likely to be seen as popular by that individual. These results highlight the importance of describing popularity as a network, exploring dyadic, triadic, and group processes separately.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 12-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000709/pdfft?md5=0e8ac42bae3712ebd58284885621e8ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873323000709-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How adolescents’ popularity perceptions change: Measuring interactions between popularity and friendship networks\",\"authors\":\"Ana Bravo ,&nbsp;Robert W. Krause ,&nbsp;Rosario Ortega-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Eva M. Romera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Longitudinal multivariate social network analysis (<em>N</em>=3692 adolescents; 136 classrooms) showed that adolescents were more likely to perceive their friends as popular but did not choose peers that they perceived to be popular as friends. Adolescents aligned their perceptions of popularity with their friends. Adolescents who received many popularity nominations attracted more popularity but not more friendship. Friends of peers seen as popular by an individual were more likely to be seen as popular by that individual. These results highlight the importance of describing popularity as a network, exploring dyadic, triadic, and group processes separately.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 12-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000709/pdfft?md5=0e8ac42bae3712ebd58284885621e8ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873323000709-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵向多元社会网络分析(N=3692名青少年;136间教室)显示,青少年更有可能认为他们的朋友很受欢迎,但不会选择他们认为受欢迎的朋友。青少年对受欢迎程度的看法与他们的朋友一致。获得很多人气提名的青少年得到了更多的人气,但没有得到更多的友谊。被一个人认为受欢迎的同龄人的朋友更有可能被那个人认为受欢迎。这些结果强调了将受欢迎程度描述为一个网络,分别探索二元、三元和群体过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How adolescents’ popularity perceptions change: Measuring interactions between popularity and friendship networks

Longitudinal multivariate social network analysis (N=3692 adolescents; 136 classrooms) showed that adolescents were more likely to perceive their friends as popular but did not choose peers that they perceived to be popular as friends. Adolescents aligned their perceptions of popularity with their friends. Adolescents who received many popularity nominations attracted more popularity but not more friendship. Friends of peers seen as popular by an individual were more likely to be seen as popular by that individual. These results highlight the importance of describing popularity as a network, exploring dyadic, triadic, and group processes separately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1