考虑发展数据的自回归交叉滞后面板模型中人与人之间和人与人之间的关系

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101258
Lesa Hoffman , Garret J. Hall
{"title":"考虑发展数据的自回归交叉滞后面板模型中人与人之间和人与人之间的关系","authors":"Lesa Hoffman ,&nbsp;Garret J. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Longitudinal data can provide inferences at both the between-person and within-person levels of analysis, but only to the extent that the statistical models chosen for data analysis are specified to adequately capture these distinct sources of association. The present work focuses on auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models, which have long been used to examine time-lagged reciprocal relations and mediation among multiple variables measured repeatedly over time. Unfortunately, many common implementations of these models fail to distinguish between-person associations among individual differences in the variables' amounts and changes over time, and thus confound between-person and within-person relations either partially or entirely, leading to inaccurate results. Furthermore, in the increasingly complex model variants that continue to be developed, what is not easily appreciated is how substantial differences in interpretation can be created by what appear to be trivial differences in model specification. In the present work, we aimed to (a) help analysts become better acquainted with the some of the more common model variants that fall under this larger umbrella, and (b) explicate what characteristics of one's data and research questions should be considered in selecting a model. Supplementary Materials include annotated model syntax and output using M<em>plus</em>, lavaan in R, and sem in Stata to help translate these concepts into practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering between- and within-person relations in auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models for developmental data\",\"authors\":\"Lesa Hoffman ,&nbsp;Garret J. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Longitudinal data can provide inferences at both the between-person and within-person levels of analysis, but only to the extent that the statistical models chosen for data analysis are specified to adequately capture these distinct sources of association. The present work focuses on auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models, which have long been used to examine time-lagged reciprocal relations and mediation among multiple variables measured repeatedly over time. Unfortunately, many common implementations of these models fail to distinguish between-person associations among individual differences in the variables' amounts and changes over time, and thus confound between-person and within-person relations either partially or entirely, leading to inaccurate results. Furthermore, in the increasingly complex model variants that continue to be developed, what is not easily appreciated is how substantial differences in interpretation can be created by what appear to be trivial differences in model specification. In the present work, we aimed to (a) help analysts become better acquainted with the some of the more common model variants that fall under this larger umbrella, and (b) explicate what characteristics of one's data and research questions should be considered in selecting a model. Supplementary Materials include annotated model syntax and output using M<em>plus</em>, lavaan in R, and sem in Stata to help translate these concepts into practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000869\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵向数据可以在人与人之间和人与人之间的分析水平上提供推论,但仅限于为数据分析选择的统计模型被指定为充分捕捉这些不同的关联来源。目前的研究重点是自回归交叉滞后面板模型,该模型长期以来一直用于检验时间滞后的相互关系和随时间重复测量的多个变量之间的中介作用。不幸的是,这些模型的许多常见实现无法区分变量数量和随时间变化的个体差异之间的人与人之间的关联,从而部分或完全混淆了人与人之间和人与人之间的关系,导致结果不准确。此外,在不断开发的日益复杂的模型变体中,不容易理解的是,如何通过模型规范中看似微不足道的差异来创建解释中的实质性差异。在目前的工作中,我们的目标是(a)帮助分析人员更好地了解一些更常见的模型变体,这些模型变体属于这个更大的保护伞,(b)说明在选择模型时应该考虑数据和研究问题的哪些特征。补充材料包括带注释的模型语法和使用Mplus, R中的lavaan和Stata中的sem的输出,以帮助将这些概念转化为实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Considering between- and within-person relations in auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models for developmental data

Longitudinal data can provide inferences at both the between-person and within-person levels of analysis, but only to the extent that the statistical models chosen for data analysis are specified to adequately capture these distinct sources of association. The present work focuses on auto-regressive cross-lagged panel models, which have long been used to examine time-lagged reciprocal relations and mediation among multiple variables measured repeatedly over time. Unfortunately, many common implementations of these models fail to distinguish between-person associations among individual differences in the variables' amounts and changes over time, and thus confound between-person and within-person relations either partially or entirely, leading to inaccurate results. Furthermore, in the increasingly complex model variants that continue to be developed, what is not easily appreciated is how substantial differences in interpretation can be created by what appear to be trivial differences in model specification. In the present work, we aimed to (a) help analysts become better acquainted with the some of the more common model variants that fall under this larger umbrella, and (b) explicate what characteristics of one's data and research questions should be considered in selecting a model. Supplementary Materials include annotated model syntax and output using Mplus, lavaan in R, and sem in Stata to help translate these concepts into practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the treatment utility of the Cognitive Assessment System: A meta-analysis of reading and mathematics outcomes The CARES classroom observation tool: Psychometrics of an observational measure of culturally responsive practices Profiles of principal stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates Emotional intersection: Delineating test anxiety, emotional disorders, and student well-being Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in early childhood special education: Identifying mechanisms of action that explain why it works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1