{"title":"儿童高流量鼻插管输氧成功的临床因素。","authors":"Gokce Iplik, Dincer Yildizdas, Ahmet Yontem","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1730915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed to evaluate the success rate of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and factors causing therapy failure. This prospective observational study included 131 children who received HFNC oxygen and followed-up in the pediatric emergency department, pediatric clinics, and pediatric intensive care unit between March 2018 and December 2019. The median age was 23.0 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0-92.0) and 65 patients were male (49.6%). The most common reason for requiring HFNC oxygen therapy was pneumonia ( <i>n</i> = 75, 57.3%). A complex chronic condition was present in 112 (85.5%) patients. Therapy success was achieved in 116 patients (88.5%). The reason for requiring treatment and the patients' complex chronic condition did not affect the success of the therapy ( <i>p</i> = 0.294 and 0.091, respectively). In the first 24 hours of treatment, a significant improvement in pulse rate, respiratory rate, pH, and lactate level were observed in successful HFNC oxygen patients ( <i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, these patients showed a significant improvement in SpO <sub>2</sub> and SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> ratio, and a significant decrease in FiO <sub>2</sub> and flow rate ( <i>p</i> < 0.05). HFNC oxygen success rate was 95.6% in patients with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> ≥ 150 at the 24th hour; it was 58.0% in those with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> < 150 ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). Caution should be exercised in terms of HFNC oxygen failure in patients with no significant improvement in vital signs and with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> < 150 during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894699/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1730915.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Factors of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Success in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Gokce Iplik, Dincer Yildizdas, Ahmet Yontem\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1730915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was aimed to evaluate the success rate of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and factors causing therapy failure. This prospective observational study included 131 children who received HFNC oxygen and followed-up in the pediatric emergency department, pediatric clinics, and pediatric intensive care unit between March 2018 and December 2019. The median age was 23.0 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0-92.0) and 65 patients were male (49.6%). The most common reason for requiring HFNC oxygen therapy was pneumonia ( <i>n</i> = 75, 57.3%). A complex chronic condition was present in 112 (85.5%) patients. Therapy success was achieved in 116 patients (88.5%). The reason for requiring treatment and the patients' complex chronic condition did not affect the success of the therapy ( <i>p</i> = 0.294 and 0.091, respectively). In the first 24 hours of treatment, a significant improvement in pulse rate, respiratory rate, pH, and lactate level were observed in successful HFNC oxygen patients ( <i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, these patients showed a significant improvement in SpO <sub>2</sub> and SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> ratio, and a significant decrease in FiO <sub>2</sub> and flow rate ( <i>p</i> < 0.05). HFNC oxygen success rate was 95.6% in patients with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> ≥ 150 at the 24th hour; it was 58.0% in those with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> < 150 ( <i>p</i> < 0.001). Caution should be exercised in terms of HFNC oxygen failure in patients with no significant improvement in vital signs and with SpO <sub>2</sub> /FiO <sub>2</sub> < 150 during treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894699/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1730915.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Factors of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Success in Children.
This study was aimed to evaluate the success rate of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and factors causing therapy failure. This prospective observational study included 131 children who received HFNC oxygen and followed-up in the pediatric emergency department, pediatric clinics, and pediatric intensive care unit between March 2018 and December 2019. The median age was 23.0 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.0-92.0) and 65 patients were male (49.6%). The most common reason for requiring HFNC oxygen therapy was pneumonia ( n = 75, 57.3%). A complex chronic condition was present in 112 (85.5%) patients. Therapy success was achieved in 116 patients (88.5%). The reason for requiring treatment and the patients' complex chronic condition did not affect the success of the therapy ( p = 0.294 and 0.091, respectively). In the first 24 hours of treatment, a significant improvement in pulse rate, respiratory rate, pH, and lactate level were observed in successful HFNC oxygen patients ( p < 0.05). In addition, these patients showed a significant improvement in SpO 2 and SpO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, and a significant decrease in FiO 2 and flow rate ( p < 0.05). HFNC oxygen success rate was 95.6% in patients with SpO 2 /FiO 2 ≥ 150 at the 24th hour; it was 58.0% in those with SpO 2 /FiO 2 < 150 ( p < 0.001). Caution should be exercised in terms of HFNC oxygen failure in patients with no significant improvement in vital signs and with SpO 2 /FiO 2 < 150 during treatment.