教师的主动行为:与工作特征和专业能力的互动:一项纵向研究。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL British Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1111/bjep.12642
Verena Jörg, Ulrike Hartmann, Anja Philipp, Mareike Kunter
{"title":"教师的主动行为:与工作特征和专业能力的互动:一项纵向研究。","authors":"Verena Jörg,&nbsp;Ulrike Hartmann,&nbsp;Anja Philipp,&nbsp;Mareike Kunter","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In times of accelerating changes, teachers who proactively engage in activities towards school improvement and innovation are increasingly needed. Still, studies on factors that affect teachers' proactive behaviour are rare.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating previous research on proactive behaviour within the <i>Job Demand–Resources</i> (<i>JD-R</i>) <i>Model</i>, this paper investigates how job characteristics (<i>time pressure</i>, <i>bureaucratic structures</i>, <i>participative climate</i>, <i>personal initiative of the team</i>) and aspects of teachers' professional competence (<i>self-efficacy</i>, <i>self-regulation skills</i> and <i>knowledge</i>) contribute to and interact with their proactive behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Sample</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 130 German secondary school teachers (M(SD)<sub>age</sub> = 44.05 (11.36), 65% female) participated in this study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We employed a full two-wave panel design, with measurement points 5 months apart. The data were analysed with (moderated) single indicator modelling and a cross-lagged panel model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>While teachers' self-efficacy in implementing change and self-regulation skills predicted their concurrent proactive behaviour, job characteristics and teachers' knowledge had no such cross-sectional effects. In addition, we found an interaction effect of time pressure and teachers' self-efficacy on proactive behaviour. Including the second measurement point, data indicated no cross-lagged effects of the job and personal factors on proactive behaviour. However, cross-lagged analysis revealed that teachers' proactive behaviour predicted their later self-efficacy in implementing change and the time pressure they perceive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Examining both cross-sectional and longitudinal effects, this study highlights the importance of measurements over time when analysing factors that influence teachers' proactive behaviour: While aspects of professional competence appear to be trainable concurrent resources, time pressure can limit their effect. Finally, cross-lagged effects of teachers' proactive behaviour on their later self-efficacy and time pressure appear as influential in the long run.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjep.12642","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers' proactive behaviour: Interactions with job characteristics and professional competence in a longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Verena Jörg,&nbsp;Ulrike Hartmann,&nbsp;Anja Philipp,&nbsp;Mareike Kunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjep.12642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In times of accelerating changes, teachers who proactively engage in activities towards school improvement and innovation are increasingly needed. Still, studies on factors that affect teachers' proactive behaviour are rare.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Integrating previous research on proactive behaviour within the <i>Job Demand–Resources</i> (<i>JD-R</i>) <i>Model</i>, this paper investigates how job characteristics (<i>time pressure</i>, <i>bureaucratic structures</i>, <i>participative climate</i>, <i>personal initiative of the team</i>) and aspects of teachers' professional competence (<i>self-efficacy</i>, <i>self-regulation skills</i> and <i>knowledge</i>) contribute to and interact with their proactive behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Sample</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 130 German secondary school teachers (M(SD)<sub>age</sub> = 44.05 (11.36), 65% female) participated in this study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We employed a full two-wave panel design, with measurement points 5 months apart. The data were analysed with (moderated) single indicator modelling and a cross-lagged panel model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>While teachers' self-efficacy in implementing change and self-regulation skills predicted their concurrent proactive behaviour, job characteristics and teachers' knowledge had no such cross-sectional effects. In addition, we found an interaction effect of time pressure and teachers' self-efficacy on proactive behaviour. Including the second measurement point, data indicated no cross-lagged effects of the job and personal factors on proactive behaviour. However, cross-lagged analysis revealed that teachers' proactive behaviour predicted their later self-efficacy in implementing change and the time pressure they perceive.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Examining both cross-sectional and longitudinal effects, this study highlights the importance of measurements over time when analysing factors that influence teachers' proactive behaviour: While aspects of professional competence appear to be trainable concurrent resources, time pressure can limit their effect. Finally, cross-lagged effects of teachers' proactive behaviour on their later self-efficacy and time pressure appear as influential in the long run.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjep.12642\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12642\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在变革加速的时代,越来越需要积极参与学校改进和创新活动的教师。然而,关于影响教师主动性行为的因素的研究很少。目的:结合以往在工作需求-资源(Job Demand-Resources, JD-R)模型下对主动性行为的研究,研究工作特征(时间压力、官僚结构、参与氛围、团队的个人主动性)和教师专业能力(自我效能感、自我调节技能和知识)对教师主动性行为的影响和相互作用。样本:共有130名德国中学教师(M(SD)年龄= 44.05(11.36),其中65%为女性)参与本研究。方法:采用全双波面板设计,测量点间隔5个月。数据分析(缓和)单一指标模型和交叉滞后面板模型。结果:教师实施变革的自我效能感和自我调节技能对教师的并行主动行为有预测作用,而工作特征和教师知识对教师的并行主动行为没有预测作用。此外,我们发现时间压力和教师自我效能感对主动性行为有交互作用。包括第二个测量点在内,数据表明工作和个人因素对主动行为没有交叉滞后影响。然而,交叉滞后分析显示,教师的主动行为预测了他们在实施变革方面的自我效能感和他们感受到的时间压力。结论:本研究考察了横断面效应和纵向效应,在分析影响教师主动性行为的因素时,强调了随时间测量的重要性:虽然专业能力的各个方面似乎是可训练的并行资源,但时间压力会限制它们的影响。最后,教师主动行为对其后期自我效能感和时间压力的交叉滞后效应在长期中表现出影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teachers' proactive behaviour: Interactions with job characteristics and professional competence in a longitudinal study

Background

In times of accelerating changes, teachers who proactively engage in activities towards school improvement and innovation are increasingly needed. Still, studies on factors that affect teachers' proactive behaviour are rare.

Aims

Integrating previous research on proactive behaviour within the Job Demand–Resources (JD-R) Model, this paper investigates how job characteristics (time pressure, bureaucratic structures, participative climate, personal initiative of the team) and aspects of teachers' professional competence (self-efficacy, self-regulation skills and knowledge) contribute to and interact with their proactive behaviour.

Sample

A total of 130 German secondary school teachers (M(SD)age = 44.05 (11.36), 65% female) participated in this study.

Methods

We employed a full two-wave panel design, with measurement points 5 months apart. The data were analysed with (moderated) single indicator modelling and a cross-lagged panel model.

Results

While teachers' self-efficacy in implementing change and self-regulation skills predicted their concurrent proactive behaviour, job characteristics and teachers' knowledge had no such cross-sectional effects. In addition, we found an interaction effect of time pressure and teachers' self-efficacy on proactive behaviour. Including the second measurement point, data indicated no cross-lagged effects of the job and personal factors on proactive behaviour. However, cross-lagged analysis revealed that teachers' proactive behaviour predicted their later self-efficacy in implementing change and the time pressure they perceive.

Conclusions

Examining both cross-sectional and longitudinal effects, this study highlights the importance of measurements over time when analysing factors that influence teachers' proactive behaviour: While aspects of professional competence appear to be trainable concurrent resources, time pressure can limit their effect. Finally, cross-lagged effects of teachers' proactive behaviour on their later self-efficacy and time pressure appear as influential in the long run.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
期刊最新文献
The effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on teachers' and parents' judgements of pupils' cognitive abilities. Feeling better now? Being defended diminishes daily mood problems and self-blame in victims of bullying. Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice. A machine-learning model of academic resilience in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence drawn from 79 countries/economies in the PISA 2022 mathematics study. Attitudes towards statistics and statistical performance: A mediation model of statistics anxiety and academic procrastination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1