Ewelina Bartkowiak, Krzysztof Piwowarczyk, Jadzia Tin-Tsen Chou, Hanna Klimza, Małgorzata Wierzbicka
{"title":"腮腺多形性腺瘤再手术对患者和外科医生的满意度:可以改善什么?","authors":"Ewelina Bartkowiak, Krzysztof Piwowarczyk, Jadzia Tin-Tsen Chou, Hanna Klimza, Małgorzata Wierzbicka","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2023.2171106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery, the treatment of choice for parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA), is associated with facial nerve palsy and decreased quality of life. Re-operation for PA recurrence (rPA) significantly increases these risks and constitutes a dilemma for both patient and surgeon. Factors influencing the success of re-operation, as well as the self-reported satisfaction of both sides, have yet to be addressed in the literature. This study aims to improve upon the decision-making schedule in PA re-operations, based on patient expectations, imaging, and concordance with the first operative report (FOpR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two rPAs treated in a single tertiary center were collected and analyzed. The FOpRs and pre-operative imaging were divided according to defined criteria into accurate and non-accurate categories. The re-operative field and course were categorized as anticipated or unanticipated. The re-operation was categorized as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for both the patient and the surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of FOpRs and pre-operative imaging was 36.1% and 69.4%, respectively. Re-operative courses were: 36.1% anticipated and 63.9% unanticipated. The most frequently omitted data were: presence of satellite tumors (9.7%), and amount of removed parenchyma (9.7%). Variables that most commonly affected FOpR non-accuracy were: tumor size (Chi2(1)=59.92; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and capsule condition (Chi2(1)=29.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between FOpR accuracy and re-operative course (Chi2(1)=1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.286), patient satisfaction (Chi2(1)=1.94; <i>p</i> = 0.164) or surgeon satisfaction (Chi2(1)=0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.837). Pre-operative imaging (Chi2(1)=36.73; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest impact on surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate pre-operative imaging impacted surgeon satisfaction. The impact of the FOpR on re-operation technicalities and patient satisfaction was minor. Imaging precision should be improved to streamline the decision-making process of PA re-operation. This article proposes suggestions for a future decision-making algorithm as a starting point for a prospective study.Key messagesAccurate pre-operative imaging impacts both surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is no significant relationship between the accuracy of the first operative report and surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is a statistically significant relationship between patient and surgeon satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8371,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"55 1","pages":"881-888"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parotid gland pleomorphic adenoma re-operations with regard to patient and surgeon satisfaction: what can be improved?\",\"authors\":\"Ewelina Bartkowiak, Krzysztof Piwowarczyk, Jadzia Tin-Tsen Chou, Hanna Klimza, Małgorzata Wierzbicka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2023.2171106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery, the treatment of choice for parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA), is associated with facial nerve palsy and decreased quality of life. Re-operation for PA recurrence (rPA) significantly increases these risks and constitutes a dilemma for both patient and surgeon. Factors influencing the success of re-operation, as well as the self-reported satisfaction of both sides, have yet to be addressed in the literature. This study aims to improve upon the decision-making schedule in PA re-operations, based on patient expectations, imaging, and concordance with the first operative report (FOpR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-two rPAs treated in a single tertiary center were collected and analyzed. The FOpRs and pre-operative imaging were divided according to defined criteria into accurate and non-accurate categories. The re-operative field and course were categorized as anticipated or unanticipated. The re-operation was categorized as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for both the patient and the surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of FOpRs and pre-operative imaging was 36.1% and 69.4%, respectively. Re-operative courses were: 36.1% anticipated and 63.9% unanticipated. The most frequently omitted data were: presence of satellite tumors (9.7%), and amount of removed parenchyma (9.7%). Variables that most commonly affected FOpR non-accuracy were: tumor size (Chi2(1)=59.92; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and capsule condition (Chi2(1)=29.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between FOpR accuracy and re-operative course (Chi2(1)=1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.286), patient satisfaction (Chi2(1)=1.94; <i>p</i> = 0.164) or surgeon satisfaction (Chi2(1)=0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.837). Pre-operative imaging (Chi2(1)=36.73; <i>p</i> < 0.001) had the greatest impact on surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate pre-operative imaging impacted surgeon satisfaction. The impact of the FOpR on re-operation technicalities and patient satisfaction was minor. Imaging precision should be improved to streamline the decision-making process of PA re-operation. This article proposes suggestions for a future decision-making algorithm as a starting point for a prospective study.Key messagesAccurate pre-operative imaging impacts both surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is no significant relationship between the accuracy of the first operative report and surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is a statistically significant relationship between patient and surgeon satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"881-888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2171106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2171106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手术是腮腺多形性腺瘤(PA)的首选治疗方法,与面神经麻痹和生活质量下降有关。再次手术治疗PA复发(rPA)显著增加了这些风险,并构成了患者和外科医生的两难选择。影响再次手术成功的因素,以及双方自我报告的满意度,尚未在文献中得到解决。本研究旨在根据患者的期望、影像学以及与第一次手术报告(FOpR)的一致性,改进PA再手术的决策时间表。方法:收集并分析在一个三级中心治疗的72例rPA。FOpRs和术前成像根据定义的标准分为准确和非准确两类。再次手术的领域和过程被分为预期或意外。对患者和外科医生来说,再次手术分为满意或不满意。结果:FOpRs和术前影像学检查的准确率分别为36.1%和69.4%。再次手术的过程为:36.1%为预期,63.9%为非预期。最常被遗漏的数据是:卫星肿瘤的存在(9.7%)和切除的薄壁组织的数量(9.7%。最常影响FOpR非准确性的变量是:肿瘤大小(Chi2(1)=59.92;p p p = 0.286)、患者满意度(Chi2(1)=1.94;p = 0.164)或外科医生满意度(Chi2(1)=0.04;p = 术前影像学(Chi2(1)=36.73;p 结论:准确的术前影像学检查影响了外科医生的满意度。FOpR对再手术技术和患者满意度的影响很小。应提高成像精度,以简化PA再手术的决策过程。本文提出了未来决策算法的建议,作为前瞻性研究的起点。关键信息准确的术前成像会影响外科医生和患者的满意度。首次手术报告的准确性与外科医生和患者的满意度之间没有显著关系。患者和外科医生的满意度之间存在统计学上显著的关系。
Parotid gland pleomorphic adenoma re-operations with regard to patient and surgeon satisfaction: what can be improved?
Background: Surgery, the treatment of choice for parotid pleomorphic adenoma (PA), is associated with facial nerve palsy and decreased quality of life. Re-operation for PA recurrence (rPA) significantly increases these risks and constitutes a dilemma for both patient and surgeon. Factors influencing the success of re-operation, as well as the self-reported satisfaction of both sides, have yet to be addressed in the literature. This study aims to improve upon the decision-making schedule in PA re-operations, based on patient expectations, imaging, and concordance with the first operative report (FOpR).
Methods: Seventy-two rPAs treated in a single tertiary center were collected and analyzed. The FOpRs and pre-operative imaging were divided according to defined criteria into accurate and non-accurate categories. The re-operative field and course were categorized as anticipated or unanticipated. The re-operation was categorized as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for both the patient and the surgeon.
Results: The accuracy of FOpRs and pre-operative imaging was 36.1% and 69.4%, respectively. Re-operative courses were: 36.1% anticipated and 63.9% unanticipated. The most frequently omitted data were: presence of satellite tumors (9.7%), and amount of removed parenchyma (9.7%). Variables that most commonly affected FOpR non-accuracy were: tumor size (Chi2(1)=59.92; p < 0.001) and capsule condition (Chi2(1)=29.11; p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between FOpR accuracy and re-operative course (Chi2(1)=1.14; p = 0.286), patient satisfaction (Chi2(1)=1.94; p = 0.164) or surgeon satisfaction (Chi2(1)=0.04; p = 0.837). Pre-operative imaging (Chi2(1)=36.73; p < 0.001) had the greatest impact on surgeon satisfaction.
Conclusion: Accurate pre-operative imaging impacted surgeon satisfaction. The impact of the FOpR on re-operation technicalities and patient satisfaction was minor. Imaging precision should be improved to streamline the decision-making process of PA re-operation. This article proposes suggestions for a future decision-making algorithm as a starting point for a prospective study.Key messagesAccurate pre-operative imaging impacts both surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is no significant relationship between the accuracy of the first operative report and surgeon and patient satisfaction.There is a statistically significant relationship between patient and surgeon satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Medicine is one of the world’s leading general medical review journals, boasting an impact factor of 5.435. It presents high-quality topical review articles, commissioned by the Editors and Editorial Committee, as well as original articles. The journal provides the current opinion on recent developments across the major medical specialties, with a particular focus on internal medicine. The peer-reviewed content of the journal keeps readers updated on the latest advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of diseases, and in how molecular medicine and genetics can be applied in daily clinical practice.