在西班牙实施食管内镜黏膜下剥离术:全国登记的结果。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterologia y hepatologia Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.008
Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago , Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada , Eduardo Albéniz , Felipe Ramos Zabala , Gloria Fernández-Esparrach , Oscar Nogales , Pedro Rosón , Beatriz Peñas García , Hugo Uchima , Álvaro Terán , Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez , Diego de Frutos , Sofía Parejo Carbonell , José Santiago , José Díaz Tasende , Charly Guarner Argente , Pedro de María Pallarés , Ana Amorós , Daniel Barranco , Daniel Álvarez de Castro , José Carlos Marín-Gabriel
{"title":"在西班牙实施食管内镜黏膜下剥离术:全国登记的结果。","authors":"Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago ,&nbsp;Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada ,&nbsp;Eduardo Albéniz ,&nbsp;Felipe Ramos Zabala ,&nbsp;Gloria Fernández-Esparrach ,&nbsp;Oscar Nogales ,&nbsp;Pedro Rosón ,&nbsp;Beatriz Peñas García ,&nbsp;Hugo Uchima ,&nbsp;Álvaro Terán ,&nbsp;Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez ,&nbsp;Diego de Frutos ,&nbsp;Sofía Parejo Carbonell ,&nbsp;José Santiago ,&nbsp;José Díaz Tasende ,&nbsp;Charly Guarner Argente ,&nbsp;Pedro de María Pallarés ,&nbsp;Ana Amorós ,&nbsp;Daniel Barranco ,&nbsp;Daniel Álvarez de Castro ,&nbsp;José Carlos Marín-Gabriel","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and aims</h3><p>The outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus have not been assessed in our country. Our primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analysis of the prospectively maintained national registry of ESD. We included all superficial esophageal lesions removed by ESD in 17 hospitals (20 endoscopists) between January 2016 and December 2021. Subepithelial lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was curative resection. We conducted a survival analysis and used logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of non-curative resection.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 102 ESD were performed on 96 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the percentage of en-bloc resection was 98%. The percentage of R0 and curative resection was 77.5% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->79; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 68%-84%) and 63.7% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 54%-72%), respectively. The most frequent histology was Barrett-related neoplasia (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->55 [53.9%]). The main reason for non-curative resection was deep submucosal invasion (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25). The centers with a lower volume of ESD obtained worse results in terms of curative resection. The rate of perforation, delayed bleeding and post-procedural stenosis were 5%, 5% and 15.7%, respectively. No patient died or required surgery due to an adverse effect. After a median follow-up of 14<!--> <!-->months, 20<!--> <!-->patients (20.8%) underwent surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy, and 9 patients died (mortality 9.4%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In Spain, esophageal ESD is curative in approximately two out of three patients, with an acceptable risk of adverse events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementación de la disección endoscópica submucosa esofágica en España: resultados del registro nacional\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago ,&nbsp;Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada ,&nbsp;Eduardo Albéniz ,&nbsp;Felipe Ramos Zabala ,&nbsp;Gloria Fernández-Esparrach ,&nbsp;Oscar Nogales ,&nbsp;Pedro Rosón ,&nbsp;Beatriz Peñas García ,&nbsp;Hugo Uchima ,&nbsp;Álvaro Terán ,&nbsp;Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez ,&nbsp;Diego de Frutos ,&nbsp;Sofía Parejo Carbonell ,&nbsp;José Santiago ,&nbsp;José Díaz Tasende ,&nbsp;Charly Guarner Argente ,&nbsp;Pedro de María Pallarés ,&nbsp;Ana Amorós ,&nbsp;Daniel Barranco ,&nbsp;Daniel Álvarez de Castro ,&nbsp;José Carlos Marín-Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and aims</h3><p>The outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus have not been assessed in our country. Our primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the technique.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analysis of the prospectively maintained national registry of ESD. We included all superficial esophageal lesions removed by ESD in 17 hospitals (20 endoscopists) between January 2016 and December 2021. Subepithelial lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was curative resection. We conducted a survival analysis and used logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of non-curative resection.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 102 ESD were performed on 96 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the percentage of en-bloc resection was 98%. The percentage of R0 and curative resection was 77.5% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->79; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 68%-84%) and 63.7% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->65; 95%<!--> <!-->CI: 54%-72%), respectively. The most frequent histology was Barrett-related neoplasia (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->55 [53.9%]). The main reason for non-curative resection was deep submucosal invasion (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25). The centers with a lower volume of ESD obtained worse results in terms of curative resection. The rate of perforation, delayed bleeding and post-procedural stenosis were 5%, 5% and 15.7%, respectively. No patient died or required surgery due to an adverse effect. After a median follow-up of 14<!--> <!-->months, 20<!--> <!-->patients (20.8%) underwent surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy, and 9 patients died (mortality 9.4%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In Spain, esophageal ESD is curative in approximately two out of three patients, with an acceptable risk of adverse events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210570523000420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210570523000420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目的:我国尚未对食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的效果进行评估。我们的主要目的是分析该技术的有效性和安全性:对前瞻性维护的全国 ESD 登记进行分析。我们纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月期间17家医院(20名内镜医师)通过ESD切除的所有浅表食管病变。上皮下病变除外。主要结果为治愈性切除。我们进行了生存分析,并使用逻辑回归分析评估了非根治性切除的预测因素:96名患者共进行了102例ESD手术。技术成功率为 100%,全切率为 98%。R0和根治性切除的比例分别为77.5%(n=79;95%CI:68%-84%)和63.7%(n=65;95%CI:54%-72%)。最常见的组织学类型是巴雷特相关肿瘤(55 人 [53.9%])。非根治性切除的主要原因是粘膜下深层侵犯(25 例)。ESD数量较少的中心在根治性切除方面的结果较差。穿孔率、延迟出血率和术后狭窄率分别为5%、5%和15.7%。没有患者因不良反应而死亡或需要手术。中位随访14个月后,20名患者(20.8%)接受了手术和/或放化疗,9名患者死亡(死亡率为9.4%):结论:在西班牙,食管ESD可治愈约三分之二的患者,不良反应风险可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementación de la disección endoscópica submucosa esofágica en España: resultados del registro nacional

Introduction and aims

The outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus have not been assessed in our country. Our primary aim was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the technique.

Material and methods

Analysis of the prospectively maintained national registry of ESD. We included all superficial esophageal lesions removed by ESD in 17 hospitals (20 endoscopists) between January 2016 and December 2021. Subepithelial lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was curative resection. We conducted a survival analysis and used logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of non-curative resection.

Results

A total of 102 ESD were performed on 96 patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the percentage of en-bloc resection was 98%. The percentage of R0 and curative resection was 77.5% (n = 79; 95% CI: 68%-84%) and 63.7% (n = 65; 95% CI: 54%-72%), respectively. The most frequent histology was Barrett-related neoplasia (n = 55 [53.9%]). The main reason for non-curative resection was deep submucosal invasion (n = 25). The centers with a lower volume of ESD obtained worse results in terms of curative resection. The rate of perforation, delayed bleeding and post-procedural stenosis were 5%, 5% and 15.7%, respectively. No patient died or required surgery due to an adverse effect. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 20 patients (20.8%) underwent surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy, and 9 patients died (mortality 9.4%).

Conclusions

In Spain, esophageal ESD is curative in approximately two out of three patients, with an acceptable risk of adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Screening for advanced liver disease incorporating the use of transitional elastography in primary care. Venetoclax As A Possible Chemopreventive Agent In Adenomatous Polyposis: A Case Report. Cobblestone Oesophagus: A Rare Form of Severe Oesophagitis in Scleroderma. Descriptive observational study on the use of virtual reality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing biological treatment. Tips and tricks for writing a manuscript to publish in a biomedical journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1