患者报告的结肠清洁感与有效结肠清洁量表评估的结肠清洁感之间的一致性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterologia y hepatologia Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.009
Antonio Z. Gimeno-García , Federica Benítez-Zafra , Anjara Hernández , Domingo Hernandez-Negrín , David Nicolás-Pérez , Goretti Hernández , José Luis Baute-Dorta , Yaiza Cedrés , Rocío del-Castillo , Jorge Mon , Alejandro Jiménez , Marco A. Navarro-Dávila , Eduardo Rodríguez-Hernández , Onofre Alarcon , Rafael Romero , Vanessa Felipe , Noemi Segura , Manuel Hernandez-Guerra
{"title":"患者报告的结肠清洁感与有效结肠清洁量表评估的结肠清洁感之间的一致性。","authors":"Antonio Z. Gimeno-García ,&nbsp;Federica Benítez-Zafra ,&nbsp;Anjara Hernández ,&nbsp;Domingo Hernandez-Negrín ,&nbsp;David Nicolás-Pérez ,&nbsp;Goretti Hernández ,&nbsp;José Luis Baute-Dorta ,&nbsp;Yaiza Cedrés ,&nbsp;Rocío del-Castillo ,&nbsp;Jorge Mon ,&nbsp;Alejandro Jiménez ,&nbsp;Marco A. Navarro-Dávila ,&nbsp;Eduardo Rodríguez-Hernández ,&nbsp;Onofre Alarcon ,&nbsp;Rafael Romero ,&nbsp;Vanessa Felipe ,&nbsp;Noemi Segura ,&nbsp;Manuel Hernandez-Guerra","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Patients’ perception of their cleansing quality can guide strategies to improve cleansing during colonoscopy. There are no studies assessing the agreement between the quality of cleansing perceived by patients and cleansing quality assessed during colonoscopy using validated bowel preparation scales. The main aim of this study was to compare the cleansing quality reported by patients with the quality during colonoscopy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred to an outpatient colonoscopy were included. Four drawings representing different degrees of cleansing were designed. Patients chose the drawing that most resembled the last stool. The predictive ability of the patient's perception and agreement between the patient's perception and the BBPS were calculated. A BBPS score of &lt;2 points in any segment was considered inadequate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred and thirty-three patients were included (age: 62.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.7 years, male: 53.4%). Overall, 107 patients (16.9%) had inadequate cleansing during colonoscopy, and in 12.2% of cases, the patient's perception was poor. The patient's perception compared to the quality of cleanliness during colonoscopy presented a positive and negative predictive value of 54.6% and 88.3%, respectively. The agreement between patient perception and the BBPS was significant (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), although fair (<em>k</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37). The results were similar in a validation cohort of 378 patients (<em>k</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The cleanliness perceived by the patient and the quality of cleanliness using a validated scale were correlated, although fair. However, this measure satisfactorily identified patients with adequate preparation. Cleansing rescue strategies may target patients who self-report improper cleaning.</p><p><em>Registration number of the trial</em>: <span>NCT03830489</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between the perception of colon cleansing reported by patients and colon cleansing assessed by a validated colon cleansing scale\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Z. Gimeno-García ,&nbsp;Federica Benítez-Zafra ,&nbsp;Anjara Hernández ,&nbsp;Domingo Hernandez-Negrín ,&nbsp;David Nicolás-Pérez ,&nbsp;Goretti Hernández ,&nbsp;José Luis Baute-Dorta ,&nbsp;Yaiza Cedrés ,&nbsp;Rocío del-Castillo ,&nbsp;Jorge Mon ,&nbsp;Alejandro Jiménez ,&nbsp;Marco A. Navarro-Dávila ,&nbsp;Eduardo Rodríguez-Hernández ,&nbsp;Onofre Alarcon ,&nbsp;Rafael Romero ,&nbsp;Vanessa Felipe ,&nbsp;Noemi Segura ,&nbsp;Manuel Hernandez-Guerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Patients’ perception of their cleansing quality can guide strategies to improve cleansing during colonoscopy. There are no studies assessing the agreement between the quality of cleansing perceived by patients and cleansing quality assessed during colonoscopy using validated bowel preparation scales. The main aim of this study was to compare the cleansing quality reported by patients with the quality during colonoscopy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>Consecutive patients referred to an outpatient colonoscopy were included. Four drawings representing different degrees of cleansing were designed. Patients chose the drawing that most resembled the last stool. The predictive ability of the patient's perception and agreement between the patient's perception and the BBPS were calculated. A BBPS score of &lt;2 points in any segment was considered inadequate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six hundred and thirty-three patients were included (age: 62.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->13.7 years, male: 53.4%). Overall, 107 patients (16.9%) had inadequate cleansing during colonoscopy, and in 12.2% of cases, the patient's perception was poor. The patient's perception compared to the quality of cleanliness during colonoscopy presented a positive and negative predictive value of 54.6% and 88.3%, respectively. The agreement between patient perception and the BBPS was significant (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), although fair (<em>k</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37). The results were similar in a validation cohort of 378 patients (<em>k</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.41).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The cleanliness perceived by the patient and the quality of cleanliness using a validated scale were correlated, although fair. However, this measure satisfactorily identified patients with adequate preparation. Cleansing rescue strategies may target patients who self-report improper cleaning.</p><p><em>Registration number of the trial</em>: <span>NCT03830489</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210570523000432\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210570523000432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者对其清洁质量的感知可以指导结肠镜检查期间改善清洁的策略。目前还没有研究评估患者感知的清洁质量与结肠镜检查期间使用有效肠道准备量表评估的清洁质量之间的一致性。本研究的主要目的是比较患者报告的清洁质量与使用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)进行结肠镜检查时的清洁质量:患者和方法:研究对象包括连续接受门诊结肠镜检查的患者。设计了四幅代表不同清洁程度的图画。患者选择与上次大便最相似的图画。计算患者感知的预测能力以及患者感知与 BBPS 之间的一致性。结果共纳入 633 名患者(年龄:62.8±13.7 岁,男性:53.4%)。总体而言,107 名患者(16.9%)在结肠镜检查过程中清洁不足,其中 12.2% 的患者感觉不佳。患者的感知与结肠镜检查期间的清洁质量相比,阳性预测值为 54.6%,阴性预测值为 88.3%。患者感知与 BBPS 之间的一致性非常显著(PC 结论:患者感知的清洁度与 BBPS 之间的一致性非常显著:患者感知的清洁度与使用有效量表得出的清洁度质量之间存在相关性,尽管相关性一般。不过,该量表能令人满意地识别出准备充分的患者。清洁救助策略可针对自述清洁不当的患者。试验注册号:NCT03830489:NCT03830489。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement between the perception of colon cleansing reported by patients and colon cleansing assessed by a validated colon cleansing scale

Aims

Patients’ perception of their cleansing quality can guide strategies to improve cleansing during colonoscopy. There are no studies assessing the agreement between the quality of cleansing perceived by patients and cleansing quality assessed during colonoscopy using validated bowel preparation scales. The main aim of this study was to compare the cleansing quality reported by patients with the quality during colonoscopy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

Patients and methods

Consecutive patients referred to an outpatient colonoscopy were included. Four drawings representing different degrees of cleansing were designed. Patients chose the drawing that most resembled the last stool. The predictive ability of the patient's perception and agreement between the patient's perception and the BBPS were calculated. A BBPS score of <2 points in any segment was considered inadequate.

Results

Six hundred and thirty-three patients were included (age: 62.8 ± 13.7 years, male: 53.4%). Overall, 107 patients (16.9%) had inadequate cleansing during colonoscopy, and in 12.2% of cases, the patient's perception was poor. The patient's perception compared to the quality of cleanliness during colonoscopy presented a positive and negative predictive value of 54.6% and 88.3%, respectively. The agreement between patient perception and the BBPS was significant (P < 0.001), although fair (k = 0.37). The results were similar in a validation cohort of 378 patients (k = 0.41).

Conclusions

The cleanliness perceived by the patient and the quality of cleanliness using a validated scale were correlated, although fair. However, this measure satisfactorily identified patients with adequate preparation. Cleansing rescue strategies may target patients who self-report improper cleaning.

Registration number of the trial: NCT03830489.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Screening for advanced liver disease incorporating the use of transitional elastography in primary care. Venetoclax As A Possible Chemopreventive Agent In Adenomatous Polyposis: A Case Report. Cobblestone Oesophagus: A Rare Form of Severe Oesophagitis in Scleroderma. Descriptive observational study on the use of virtual reality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing biological treatment. Tips and tricks for writing a manuscript to publish in a biomedical journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1