影响骨质疏松性椎体骨折塌陷和不愈合的体内不连贯运动因素

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1177/21925682231167788
Izaya Ogon, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroyuki Takashima, Yasuhisa Abe, Hiroshi Oguma, Rui Imamura, Yoshihiro Akatsuka, Tomonori Morita, Atsushi Teramoto
{"title":"影响骨质疏松性椎体骨折塌陷和不愈合的体内不连贯运动因素","authors":"Izaya Ogon, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroyuki Takashima, Yasuhisa Abe, Hiroshi Oguma, Rui Imamura, Yoshihiro Akatsuka, Tomonori Morita, Atsushi Teramoto","doi":"10.1177/21925682231167788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning technique that applies diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is effective for the quantitative assessment of malignant tumors of the vertebral bone. We hypothesized that IVIM parameters of vertebral bodies are associated with the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). We aimed to explore the relationships between IVIM parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union after OVF and calculate the cut-off values of these parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 patients with acute OVF (150 women; mean age: 79.1 ± 7.4 years) were included and treated conservatively with bracing. MRI was performed at the time of injury. IVIM parameters, such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), molecular diffusion coefficient (D), and perfusion-related diffusion (D*) were recorded. The patients were classified into 3 groups: low-collapse (height loss of ≤50%), high-collapse (height loss of >50%), and non-union. We compared ADC, D, and D* among the low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the boundary values of the high-collapse and non-union groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups had no significant differences in ADC and D. However, D* differed significantly among the 3 groups. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 19.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s and 12.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s for the high-collapse and non-union groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D* is a significant prognostic indicator for high-collapse and non-union groups with OVF. This suggests that D* should be considered when assessing OVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Factors Affecting Collapse and Nonunion of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Izaya Ogon, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroyuki Takashima, Yasuhisa Abe, Hiroshi Oguma, Rui Imamura, Yoshihiro Akatsuka, Tomonori Morita, Atsushi Teramoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682231167788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning technique that applies diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is effective for the quantitative assessment of malignant tumors of the vertebral bone. We hypothesized that IVIM parameters of vertebral bodies are associated with the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). We aimed to explore the relationships between IVIM parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union after OVF and calculate the cut-off values of these parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 150 patients with acute OVF (150 women; mean age: 79.1 ± 7.4 years) were included and treated conservatively with bracing. MRI was performed at the time of injury. IVIM parameters, such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), molecular diffusion coefficient (D), and perfusion-related diffusion (D*) were recorded. The patients were classified into 3 groups: low-collapse (height loss of ≤50%), high-collapse (height loss of >50%), and non-union. We compared ADC, D, and D* among the low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the boundary values of the high-collapse and non-union groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups had no significant differences in ADC and D. However, D* differed significantly among the 3 groups. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 19.0 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s and 12.3 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s for the high-collapse and non-union groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D* is a significant prognostic indicator for high-collapse and non-union groups with OVF. This suggests that D* should be considered when assessing OVF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231167788\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231167788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计研究目的:纵向研究:体内非相干运动(IVIM)是一种应用弥散加权成像(DWI)的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描技术,可有效定量评估椎骨恶性肿瘤。我们假设椎体的 IVIM 参数与骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVF)的预后有关。我们旨在探讨 OVF 后椎体塌陷和不愈合的 IVIM 参数之间的关系,并计算这些参数对椎体塌陷和不愈合的临界值:共纳入 150 名急性 OVF 患者(150 名女性;平均年龄:79.1 ± 7.4 岁),他们均接受了支架保守治疗。受伤时进行核磁共振成像。记录了IVIM参数,如表观扩散系数(ADC)、分子扩散系数(D)和灌注相关扩散系数(D*)。患者被分为三组:低塌陷组(高度损失≤50%)、高塌陷组(高度损失>50%)和非塌陷组。我们比较了低塌陷组、高塌陷组和非塌陷组的 ADC、D 和 D*,并进行了接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析,以确定高塌陷组和非塌陷组的边界值:低塌陷组、高塌陷组和非塌陷组的 ADC 和 D 无显著差异。ROC 分析显示,高塌陷组和非塌陷组的临界值分别为 19.0 × 10-3 mm2/s 和 12.3 × 10-3 mm2/s:结论:D*是OVF高塌陷组和非塌陷组的重要预后指标。结论:D*是OVF高塌陷组和非塌陷组的重要预后指标,这表明在评估OVF时应考虑D*。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Factors Affecting Collapse and Nonunion of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Study design: Longitudinal study.

Objectives: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning technique that applies diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), is effective for the quantitative assessment of malignant tumors of the vertebral bone. We hypothesized that IVIM parameters of vertebral bodies are associated with the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). We aimed to explore the relationships between IVIM parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union after OVF and calculate the cut-off values of these parameters for vertebral collapse and non-union.

Methods: A total of 150 patients with acute OVF (150 women; mean age: 79.1 ± 7.4 years) were included and treated conservatively with bracing. MRI was performed at the time of injury. IVIM parameters, such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), molecular diffusion coefficient (D), and perfusion-related diffusion (D*) were recorded. The patients were classified into 3 groups: low-collapse (height loss of ≤50%), high-collapse (height loss of >50%), and non-union. We compared ADC, D, and D* among the low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the boundary values of the high-collapse and non-union groups.

Results: The low-collapse, high-collapse, and non-union groups had no significant differences in ADC and D. However, D* differed significantly among the 3 groups. ROC analysis revealed cut-off values of 19.0 × 10-3 mm2/s and 12.3 × 10-3 mm2/s for the high-collapse and non-union groups, respectively.

Conclusions: D* is a significant prognostic indicator for high-collapse and non-union groups with OVF. This suggests that D* should be considered when assessing OVF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1