心门平面对齐对4DM通道心肌SPECT左室射血分数重复性的影响

Franziska Rambow, Denis Gersdorf, Janin Jacobi, Franziska Mathies, Christiane Klene, Zsofia Zsebe, Susanne Klutmann, Ivayla Apostolova, Kenichi Nakajima, Janos Mester
{"title":"心门平面对齐对4DM通道心肌SPECT左室射血分数重复性的影响","authors":"Franziska Rambow,&nbsp;Denis Gersdorf,&nbsp;Janin Jacobi,&nbsp;Franziska Mathies,&nbsp;Christiane Klene,&nbsp;Zsofia Zsebe,&nbsp;Susanne Klutmann,&nbsp;Ivayla Apostolova,&nbsp;Kenichi Nakajima,&nbsp;Janos Mester","doi":"10.17996/anc.21-00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: In myocardial gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT), to differentiate true changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from inherent methodical variability is clinically relevant; however, data about repeatability of GSPECT LVEF in the same patients are rather inconsistent in literature. The aim of this study was therefore to determine repeatability coefficient (RC) of GSPECT LVEF at rest and to investigate the effect of the introduction of processing constraints in left ventricular edge detection. <i>Methods</i>: Thirty-five patients referred for one-day myocardial GSPECT stress-rest scan were included. After the routine stress-rest study, patients were completely repositioned on the imaging table for a second rest acquisition using the same acquisition parameters. LVEF was computed using Corridor 4DM software without and with manual alignment of valve plane. Repeatability was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. <i>Results</i>: RC of LVEF from unaligned datasets was 7.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 7.4% to -7.8%. After valve plane and ventricular long-axis length alignment, RC improved to 3.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 3.4% to -3.8%. <i>Conclusions</i>: RC using unaligned determination of GSPECT LVEF was comparable to that from previous publications. However, RC using valve plane alignment could be improved to below 4% on 95% confidence level.</p>","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040948/pdf/anc-7-27.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Valve Plane Alignment on the Repeatability of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in ECG-gatedMyocard ial SPECT Using Corridor 4DM.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Rambow,&nbsp;Denis Gersdorf,&nbsp;Janin Jacobi,&nbsp;Franziska Mathies,&nbsp;Christiane Klene,&nbsp;Zsofia Zsebe,&nbsp;Susanne Klutmann,&nbsp;Ivayla Apostolova,&nbsp;Kenichi Nakajima,&nbsp;Janos Mester\",\"doi\":\"10.17996/anc.21-00138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: In myocardial gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT), to differentiate true changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from inherent methodical variability is clinically relevant; however, data about repeatability of GSPECT LVEF in the same patients are rather inconsistent in literature. The aim of this study was therefore to determine repeatability coefficient (RC) of GSPECT LVEF at rest and to investigate the effect of the introduction of processing constraints in left ventricular edge detection. <i>Methods</i>: Thirty-five patients referred for one-day myocardial GSPECT stress-rest scan were included. After the routine stress-rest study, patients were completely repositioned on the imaging table for a second rest acquisition using the same acquisition parameters. LVEF was computed using Corridor 4DM software without and with manual alignment of valve plane. Repeatability was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. <i>Results</i>: RC of LVEF from unaligned datasets was 7.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 7.4% to -7.8%. After valve plane and ventricular long-axis length alignment, RC improved to 3.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 3.4% to -3.8%. <i>Conclusions</i>: RC using unaligned determination of GSPECT LVEF was comparable to that from previous publications. However, RC using valve plane alignment could be improved to below 4% on 95% confidence level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of nuclear cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040948/pdf/anc-7-27.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of nuclear cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心肌门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(GSPECT)中,区分左心室射血分数(LVEF)的真实变化与固有的方法变异性具有临床意义;然而,文献中关于同一患者GSPECT LVEF可重复性的数据相当不一致。因此,本研究的目的是确定静止状态下GSPECT LVEF的重复性系数(RC),并研究在左心室边缘检测中引入处理约束的影响。方法:选取35例行一日心肌GSPECT应力-休息扫描的患者。在常规的压力-休息研究之后,患者被完全重新安置在成像台上,使用相同的采集参数进行第二次休息采集。采用Corridor 4DM软件计算无阀面对齐和手动对阀面对齐的LVEF。采用Bland-Altman法评估重复性。结果:未对齐数据集LVEF的RC为7.6%,一致性上限和下限为7.4% ~ -7.8%。在瓣膜平面和心室长轴长度对齐后,RC提高到3.6%,上限和下限一致性为3.4%至-3.8%。结论:使用非对齐方法测定GSPECT LVEF的RC与以前发表的方法相当。然而,在95%的置信水平上,使用阀面对准的RC可以提高到4%以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Valve Plane Alignment on the Repeatability of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in ECG-gatedMyocard ial SPECT Using Corridor 4DM.

Background: In myocardial gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT), to differentiate true changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from inherent methodical variability is clinically relevant; however, data about repeatability of GSPECT LVEF in the same patients are rather inconsistent in literature. The aim of this study was therefore to determine repeatability coefficient (RC) of GSPECT LVEF at rest and to investigate the effect of the introduction of processing constraints in left ventricular edge detection. Methods: Thirty-five patients referred for one-day myocardial GSPECT stress-rest scan were included. After the routine stress-rest study, patients were completely repositioned on the imaging table for a second rest acquisition using the same acquisition parameters. LVEF was computed using Corridor 4DM software without and with manual alignment of valve plane. Repeatability was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Results: RC of LVEF from unaligned datasets was 7.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 7.4% to -7.8%. After valve plane and ventricular long-axis length alignment, RC improved to 3.6% with upper and lower limits of agreement of 3.4% to -3.8%. Conclusions: RC using unaligned determination of GSPECT LVEF was comparable to that from previous publications. However, RC using valve plane alignment could be improved to below 4% on 95% confidence level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Strain Derived from 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: Detection of Ischemia-Related Wall Motion Abnormality. Phantom-Based Standardization Method for 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio Validated by D-SPECT Versus Anger Camera. Modified Algorithm Using Total Count for Calculating Myocardial Washout Rate in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography. The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results. Validation of a Five-Year Prognostic Model Using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Patients with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1