用新开发的螺纹解除腕管的尸体研究，从组织学角度看。

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5535/arm.22130

Hae-Yeon Park, Jae Min Kim, In Jong Kim, Minsuk Kang, Jung Ryul Ham, Yong Seok Nam

{"title":"用新开发的螺纹解除腕管的尸体研究，从组织学角度看。","authors":"Hae-Yeon Park, Jae Min Kim, In Jong Kim, Minsuk Kang, Jung Ryul Ham, Yong Seok Nam","doi":"10.5535/arm.22130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To examine the usefulness and feasibility of modified thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) by comparing the results of using pre-existing commercial thread with those of a newly developed thread (Smartwire-01).Methods: A total of 17 cadaveric wrists were used in the study. The modified TCTR method was practiced by two different experts. Pre-existing commercial surgical dissecting thread (Loop&ShearTM) was used for five wrists and the newly developed Smartwire-01 was used for twelve wrists. The gross and microanatomy of the specimens were evaluated by a blinded anatomist.Results: Both types of thread were able to cut the TCL similarly. Gross anatomy and histologic findings showed that there was no significant difference between the two types of threads. However, the practitioners felt that it was easier to cut the TCL using the newly-developed thread.Conclusion: TCTR using Smartwire-01 was as effective as pre-existing Loop&ShearTM, with better user experiences.","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":"47 1","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/95/arm-22130.PMC10020053.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cadaveric Study of Thread Carpal Tunnel Release Using Newly Developed Thread, With a Histologic Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Hae-Yeon Park, Jae Min Kim, In Jong Kim, Minsuk Kang, Jung Ryul Ham, Yong Seok Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.5535/arm.22130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To examine the usefulness and feasibility of modified thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) by comparing the results of using pre-existing commercial thread with those of a newly developed thread (Smartwire-01).Methods: A total of 17 cadaveric wrists were used in the study. The modified TCTR method was practiced by two different experts. Pre-existing commercial surgical dissecting thread (Loop&ShearTM) was used for five wrists and the newly developed Smartwire-01 was used for twelve wrists. The gross and microanatomy of the specimens were evaluated by a blinded anatomist.Results: Both types of thread were able to cut the TCL similarly. Gross anatomy and histologic findings showed that there was no significant difference between the two types of threads. However, the practitioners felt that it was easier to cut the TCL using the newly-developed thread.Conclusion: TCTR using Smartwire-01 was as effective as pre-existing Loop&ShearTM, with better user experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"19-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/95/arm-22130.PMC10020053.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.22130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.22130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较现有商业螺纹与新开发的螺纹(Smartwire-01)的效果，探讨改良螺纹腕管松解术(TCTR)的有效性和可行性。方法:采用17具尸体腕部进行研究。由两位不同的专家进行了改进的TCTR方法的实践。已有的商业手术解剖线(Loop&ShearTM)用于5个手腕，新开发的Smartwire-01用于12个手腕。标本的大体和显微解剖由盲眼解剖学家进行评估。结果:两种螺纹切割TCL的效果相似。大体解剖和组织学结果表明，两种类型的丝线之间没有显著差异。然而，从业者认为使用新开发的线程更容易切割TCL。结论:使用Smartwire-01的TCTR效果与已有的Loop&ShearTM相当，且用户体验更好。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Cadaveric Study of Thread Carpal Tunnel Release Using Newly Developed Thread, With a Histologic Perspective.

Objective: To examine the usefulness and feasibility of modified thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) by comparing the results of using pre-existing commercial thread with those of a newly developed thread (Smartwire-01).

Methods: A total of 17 cadaveric wrists were used in the study. The modified TCTR method was practiced by two different experts. Pre-existing commercial surgical dissecting thread (Loop&ShearTM) was used for five wrists and the newly developed Smartwire-01 was used for twelve wrists. The gross and microanatomy of the specimens were evaluated by a blinded anatomist.

Results: Both types of thread were able to cut the TCL similarly. Gross anatomy and histologic findings showed that there was no significant difference between the two types of threads. However, the practitioners felt that it was easier to cut the TCL using the newly-developed thread.

Conclusion: TCTR using Smartwire-01 was as effective as pre-existing Loop&ShearTM, with better user experiences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊