Rodrigo de Marinis, Julio J Contreras, Catalina Vidal, Cristóbal Palma, Manuela Angulo, Alfonso Valenzuela, Ricardo Jaña, Claudio Calvo, Rodrigo Liendo, Francisco Soza
{"title":"反肩关节置换术的MRI角度:关节软骨对估计下盂关节倾角的影响。","authors":"Rodrigo de Marinis, Julio J Contreras, Catalina Vidal, Cristóbal Palma, Manuela Angulo, Alfonso Valenzuela, Ricardo Jaña, Claudio Calvo, Rodrigo Liendo, Francisco Soza","doi":"10.1177/24715492231167110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a <i>P-value <.001</i>. The overall agreement was considered \"good\" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and \"excellent\" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":"7 ","pages":"24715492231167110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/6f/10.1177_24715492231167110.PMC10064160.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo de Marinis, Julio J Contreras, Catalina Vidal, Cristóbal Palma, Manuela Angulo, Alfonso Valenzuela, Ricardo Jaña, Claudio Calvo, Rodrigo Liendo, Francisco Soza\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24715492231167110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a <i>P-value <.001</i>. The overall agreement was considered \\\"good\\\" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and \\\"excellent\\\" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"24715492231167110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/6f/10.1177_24715492231167110.PMC10064160.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述磁共振成像(MRI)中的反向肩关节置换术角度(RSA角),并将以骨标记(bone RSA角或B-RSA角)形成的角度与以软骨缘为参照(软骨RSA角或C-RSA角)形成的角度进行比较。方法:纳入2020年7月至2021年7月在我院接受肩部MRI检查的成年患者。测量C-RSA角和B-RSA角。所有图像由4位评估者独立评估。通过测定B-RSA和C-RSA的类内相关系数(ICC)来评价观察者间的一致性。结果:共纳入61例患者,中位年龄59岁(17-77岁)。C-RSA角度显著高于B-RSA(分别为25.4°±0.7和19.5°±0.7),p值显著高于B-RSA。C-RSA角度总体一致性为“良好”(ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]), B-RSA角度总体一致性为“优秀”(ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85])。结论:C-RSA角明显高于B-RSA角。在没有明显肩胛磨损的情况下,忽略肩胛下缘剩余的关节软骨可能会导致标准手术指南的倾斜。
The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.
Purpose: To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).
Methods: Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.
Results: A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a P-value <.001. The overall agreement was considered "good" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and "excellent" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).
Conclusions: C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.