反肩关节置换术的MRI角度:关节软骨对估计下盂关节倾角的影响。

Rodrigo de Marinis, Julio J Contreras, Catalina Vidal, Cristóbal Palma, Manuela Angulo, Alfonso Valenzuela, Ricardo Jaña, Claudio Calvo, Rodrigo Liendo, Francisco Soza
{"title":"反肩关节置换术的MRI角度:关节软骨对估计下盂关节倾角的影响。","authors":"Rodrigo de Marinis,&nbsp;Julio J Contreras,&nbsp;Catalina Vidal,&nbsp;Cristóbal Palma,&nbsp;Manuela Angulo,&nbsp;Alfonso Valenzuela,&nbsp;Ricardo Jaña,&nbsp;Claudio Calvo,&nbsp;Rodrigo Liendo,&nbsp;Francisco Soza","doi":"10.1177/24715492231167110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a <i>P-value <.001</i>. The overall agreement was considered \"good\" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and \"excellent\" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/6f/10.1177_24715492231167110.PMC10064160.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo de Marinis,&nbsp;Julio J Contreras,&nbsp;Catalina Vidal,&nbsp;Cristóbal Palma,&nbsp;Manuela Angulo,&nbsp;Alfonso Valenzuela,&nbsp;Ricardo Jaña,&nbsp;Claudio Calvo,&nbsp;Rodrigo Liendo,&nbsp;Francisco Soza\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24715492231167110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a <i>P-value <.001</i>. The overall agreement was considered \\\"good\\\" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and \\\"excellent\\\" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/6f/10.1177_24715492231167110.PMC10064160.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492231167110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述磁共振成像(MRI)中的反向肩关节置换术角度(RSA角),并将以骨标记(bone RSA角或B-RSA角)形成的角度与以软骨缘为参照(软骨RSA角或C-RSA角)形成的角度进行比较。方法:纳入2020年7月至2021年7月在我院接受肩部MRI检查的成年患者。测量C-RSA角和B-RSA角。所有图像由4位评估者独立评估。通过测定B-RSA和C-RSA的类内相关系数(ICC)来评价观察者间的一致性。结果:共纳入61例患者,中位年龄59岁(17-77岁)。C-RSA角度显著高于B-RSA(分别为25.4°±0.7和19.5°±0.7),p值显著高于B-RSA。C-RSA角度总体一致性为“良好”(ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]), B-RSA角度总体一致性为“优秀”(ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85])。结论:C-RSA角明显高于B-RSA角。在没有明显肩胛磨损的情况下,忽略肩胛下缘剩余的关节软骨可能会导致标准手术指南的倾斜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Angle in MRI: Impact of the Articular Cartilage in the Estimated Inclination of the Inferior Glenoid.

Purpose: To describe the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (RSA angle) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare the angle formed using bony landmarks (Bony RSA angle or B-RSA angle) with another angle formed using the cartilage margin as reference (Cartilage RSA angle or C-RSA angle).

Methods: Adult patients with a shoulder MRI obtained in our hospital between July 2020 and July 2021 were included. The C-RSA angle and B-RSA angle were measured. All images were independently assessed by 4 evaluators. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for the B-RSA and C-RSA to evaluate interobserver agreement.

Results: A total of 61 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (17-77). C-RSA angle was significantly higher than B-RSA (25.4° ± 0.7 vs 19.5° ± 0.7, respectively) with a P-value <.001. The overall agreement was considered "good" for C-RSA (ICC = 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.83]) and "excellent" for B-RSA angle (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.85]).

Conclusions: C-RSA angle is significantly higher than B-RSA angle. In cases without significant glenoid wear neglecting to account for the remaining articular cartilage at the inferior glenoid margin may result in superior inclination of standard surgical guides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results. Corticosteroid Infiltration to Treat Shoulder Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair. Modified Weaver Dunn Versus Ligamentous Reconstruction Grafts in Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Bone Versus Metallic Augmented, Central Screw Type Baseplate in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Matched Case-Control Study. Distal Clavicular Resection Worsens Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair: A National Database Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1