医学中可解释的人工智能和多模态因果关系。

Q1 Social Sciences i-com Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI:10.1515/icom-2020-0024
Andreas Holzinger
{"title":"医学中可解释的人工智能和多模态因果关系。","authors":"Andreas Holzinger","doi":"10.1515/icom-2020-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progress in statistical machine learning made AI in medicine successful, in certain classification tasks even beyond human level performance. Nevertheless, correlation is not causation and successful models are often complex \"black-boxes\", which make it hard to understand <i>why</i> a result has been achieved. The explainable AI (xAI) community develops methods, e. g. to highlight which input parameters are relevant for a result; however, in the medical domain there is a need for causability: In the same way that usability encompasses measurements for the quality of use, causability encompasses measurements for the quality of explanations produced by xAI. The key for future human-AI interfaces is to map explainability with causability and to allow a domain expert to ask questions to understand why an AI came up with a result, and also to ask \"what-if\" questions (counterfactuals) to gain insight into the underlying <i>independent</i> explanatory factors of a result. A multi-modal causability is important in the medical domain because often different modalities contribute to a result.</p>","PeriodicalId":37105,"journal":{"name":"i-com","volume":"19 3","pages":"171-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/icom-2020-0024","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable AI and Multi-Modal Causability in Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Holzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/icom-2020-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Progress in statistical machine learning made AI in medicine successful, in certain classification tasks even beyond human level performance. Nevertheless, correlation is not causation and successful models are often complex \\\"black-boxes\\\", which make it hard to understand <i>why</i> a result has been achieved. The explainable AI (xAI) community develops methods, e. g. to highlight which input parameters are relevant for a result; however, in the medical domain there is a need for causability: In the same way that usability encompasses measurements for the quality of use, causability encompasses measurements for the quality of explanations produced by xAI. The key for future human-AI interfaces is to map explainability with causability and to allow a domain expert to ask questions to understand why an AI came up with a result, and also to ask \\\"what-if\\\" questions (counterfactuals) to gain insight into the underlying <i>independent</i> explanatory factors of a result. A multi-modal causability is important in the medical domain because often different modalities contribute to a result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"i-com\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"171-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/icom-2020-0024\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"i-com\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i-com","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

统计机器学习的进步使人工智能在医学领域取得了成功,在某些分类任务中甚至超越了人类的水平。然而,相关性不是因果关系,成功的模型往往是复杂的“黑盒子”,这使得很难理解为什么一个结果已经实现。可解释AI (xAI)社区开发方法,例如:突出显示与结果相关的输入参数;然而,在医疗领域需要因果性:就像可用性包括使用质量的度量一样,因果性包括xAI产生的解释质量的度量。未来人类与AI界面的关键是将可解释性与因果关系映射到一起,并允许领域专家提出问题以理解AI为什么会产生结果,并提出“假设”问题(反事实)以深入了解结果的潜在独立解释因素。多模态因果关系在医学领域很重要,因为通常不同的模态会导致一个结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explainable AI and Multi-Modal Causability in Medicine.

Progress in statistical machine learning made AI in medicine successful, in certain classification tasks even beyond human level performance. Nevertheless, correlation is not causation and successful models are often complex "black-boxes", which make it hard to understand why a result has been achieved. The explainable AI (xAI) community develops methods, e. g. to highlight which input parameters are relevant for a result; however, in the medical domain there is a need for causability: In the same way that usability encompasses measurements for the quality of use, causability encompasses measurements for the quality of explanations produced by xAI. The key for future human-AI interfaces is to map explainability with causability and to allow a domain expert to ask questions to understand why an AI came up with a result, and also to ask "what-if" questions (counterfactuals) to gain insight into the underlying independent explanatory factors of a result. A multi-modal causability is important in the medical domain because often different modalities contribute to a result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
i-com
i-com Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Social anthropology 4.0 The future of interactive information radiators for knowledge workers The future of HCI – editorial Towards new realities: implications of personalized online layers in our daily lives Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1