{"title":"用于电喷雾推进诊断的简单阻滞电位飞行时间质谱仪。","authors":"Christopher T Lyne, Miron F Liu, Joshua L Rovey","doi":"10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":73724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electric propulsion","volume":"2 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher T Lyne, Miron F Liu, Joshua L Rovey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of electric propulsion\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of electric propulsion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electric propulsion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics.
The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.