用于电喷雾推进诊断的简单阻滞电位飞行时间质谱仪。

Journal of electric propulsion Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y
Christopher T Lyne, Miron F Liu, Joshua L Rovey
{"title":"用于电喷雾推进诊断的简单阻滞电位飞行时间质谱仪。","authors":"Christopher T Lyne, Miron F Liu, Joshua L Rovey","doi":"10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":73724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electric propulsion","volume":"2 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher T Lyne, Miron F Liu, Joshua L Rovey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of electric propulsion\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of electric propulsion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electric propulsion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飞行时间质谱仪(ToF-MS)是量化电喷雾推进器性能和描述其羽流特征的有用工具。ToF-MS 数据可用于计算羽流中的质量-电荷分布,但必须首先知道动能-电荷(即电势)分布。在这里,我们将 ToF-MS 与缓动电势 (RP) 分析仪结合使用。通过在羽流中存在的电位范围内扫描阻滞电位,可以独立测量质量-电荷分布和电位分布。我们使用毛细管电喷雾发射器和离子液体推进剂 1-乙基-3-甲基咪唑鎓双(三氟甲基磺酰基)亚胺(简称 EMI-Im)进行了案例研究,演示了这一技术。我们报告了阻滞电位与质量电荷比之间的线性相关关系,该关系与更复杂的正交 RP/ToF-MS 仪器的公开数据一致。射流速度和射流破裂电位的计算值分别在 2% 和 12% 的范围内。我们使用传统 ToF-MS 估算了推进剂流速,并将这些估算值与直接流速测量值进行了比较。对于 233 pL/s 至 565 pL/s 之间的流速,假设羽流电势是质量比装药量的函数时,基于 ToF 的流速估计误差在 -16% 至 -13% 之间。假定羽流电势恒定,结果不一。然而,使用阻滞电位分析仪测得的平均阻滞电位会产生更大的误差,误差范围为 -26% 到 -30%。数据和 MATLAB 代码作为补充材料提供,以便读者轻松应用此处描述的技术:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y 上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics.

The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ion current and energy in the magnetic arch of a cluster of two ECR plasma sources. Plume divergence characterization for electric propulsion via standard deviation and emittance. Design of a power processing unit with integrated telemetry for a vacuum arc thruster as part of the SeRANIS mission Multimodal electrospray thruster for small spacecraft: design and experimental characterization Temporally resolved relative krypton neutral density during breathing mode of a hall effect thruster recorded by TALIF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1