Byung-Ho Yoon, Jang-Won Park, Chan Woo Lee, Young Do Koh
{"title":"非典型股骨骨折与股骨颈骨折患者t评分不一致的不同模式。","authors":"Byung-Ho Yoon, Jang-Won Park, Chan Woo Lee, Young Do Koh","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2023.30.1.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study evaluated the prevalence and pattern of T-score discordance between the spine and hip in Korean patients with atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and femur neck fracture (FNF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 49 patients (all women) who were treated for AFF and 1:3 matched 147 female patients with FNF were included from January 2012 to August 2022. A discordance of more than 1.5 between lumbar spine and femur neck bone mineral density (BMD) was defined as a difference and divided into 3 groups: lumbar low (LL; lumbar BMD is less than femur neck BMD), no discordance (ND), and femur neck low (FL; femur neck BMD is less than lumbar BMD). We compared the prevalence and pattern of discordance between 2 groups, and the associated risk factors of T-score discordance among the subjects were evaluated using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of discordance was significantly higher in patients with AFF (51%) than in those with FNF (25.2%; p<0.001). LL discordance was found in 46.9% of the patients with AFF but only 4.8% in those with FNF. Conversely, FL discordance was found in 4.1% of the patients with AFF and 20.4% in those with FNF, respectively. No specific risk factor was found as T-score discordance in the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians should be aware that the pattern of T-score discordance can vary depending on the location of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a longitudinal study would be necessary to verify the pattern of T-score discordance related to the osteoporotic fracture location.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"30 1","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/e8/jbm-2023-30-1-87.PMC10036188.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Pattern of T-Score Discordance between Patients with Atypical Femoral Fracture and Femur Neck Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Byung-Ho Yoon, Jang-Won Park, Chan Woo Lee, Young Do Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.11005/jbm.2023.30.1.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study evaluated the prevalence and pattern of T-score discordance between the spine and hip in Korean patients with atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and femur neck fracture (FNF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 49 patients (all women) who were treated for AFF and 1:3 matched 147 female patients with FNF were included from January 2012 to August 2022. A discordance of more than 1.5 between lumbar spine and femur neck bone mineral density (BMD) was defined as a difference and divided into 3 groups: lumbar low (LL; lumbar BMD is less than femur neck BMD), no discordance (ND), and femur neck low (FL; femur neck BMD is less than lumbar BMD). We compared the prevalence and pattern of discordance between 2 groups, and the associated risk factors of T-score discordance among the subjects were evaluated using regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of discordance was significantly higher in patients with AFF (51%) than in those with FNF (25.2%; p<0.001). LL discordance was found in 46.9% of the patients with AFF but only 4.8% in those with FNF. Conversely, FL discordance was found in 4.1% of the patients with AFF and 20.4% in those with FNF, respectively. No specific risk factor was found as T-score discordance in the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians should be aware that the pattern of T-score discordance can vary depending on the location of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a longitudinal study would be necessary to verify the pattern of T-score discordance related to the osteoporotic fracture location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"87-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/e8/jbm-2023-30-1-87.PMC10036188.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2023.30.1.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2023.30.1.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different Pattern of T-Score Discordance between Patients with Atypical Femoral Fracture and Femur Neck Fracture.
Background: Our study evaluated the prevalence and pattern of T-score discordance between the spine and hip in Korean patients with atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and femur neck fracture (FNF).
Methods: A total of 49 patients (all women) who were treated for AFF and 1:3 matched 147 female patients with FNF were included from January 2012 to August 2022. A discordance of more than 1.5 between lumbar spine and femur neck bone mineral density (BMD) was defined as a difference and divided into 3 groups: lumbar low (LL; lumbar BMD is less than femur neck BMD), no discordance (ND), and femur neck low (FL; femur neck BMD is less than lumbar BMD). We compared the prevalence and pattern of discordance between 2 groups, and the associated risk factors of T-score discordance among the subjects were evaluated using regression analysis.
Results: The prevalence of discordance was significantly higher in patients with AFF (51%) than in those with FNF (25.2%; p<0.001). LL discordance was found in 46.9% of the patients with AFF but only 4.8% in those with FNF. Conversely, FL discordance was found in 4.1% of the patients with AFF and 20.4% in those with FNF, respectively. No specific risk factor was found as T-score discordance in the 2 groups.
Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that the pattern of T-score discordance can vary depending on the location of osteoporotic fractures. In addition, a longitudinal study would be necessary to verify the pattern of T-score discordance related to the osteoporotic fracture location.