中枢性发热的药理学治疗:溴隐亭、普萘洛尔和巴氯芬的证据综述。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1177/87551225221132678
Justin P Reinert, Zsanett Kormanyos
{"title":"中枢性发热的药理学治疗:溴隐亭、普萘洛尔和巴氯芬的证据综述。","authors":"Justin P Reinert,&nbsp;Zsanett Kormanyos","doi":"10.1177/87551225221132678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this review was to evaluate the clinical data supporting bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen in the pharmacologic management of central fever. <b>Data Sources:</b> A comprehensive literature review was performed between January 2018 and August 2022 using the following keywords: \"central fever\" NOT \"fever\" OR \"infection\" OR \"infectious\" AND \"neurocritical\" OR \"neurology\" AND \"treatment\" AND \"medication\" OR \"medicine\" OR \"drug\" OR \"pharmaceutical.\" <b>Study Selection and Data Extraction:</b> A total of 6 case reports met specified inclusion criteria, with 2 reporting on each of the evaluated medications. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> Significant heterogeneity exists regarding dosing strategies and duration of treatment with these medications for the management of central fever. Although each medication demonstrated the ability to restore normothermia, the variation in underlying cause of the fever and lack of cross-over evaluation between different medications makes a definitive treatment strategy for any of these agents elusive. <b>Conclusions:</b> The development of a central fever has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have suffered a critical neurologic injury. Although their exact mechanism for this indication has not been fully elucidated, anecdotal evidence seemingly supports the use of bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899958/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever: A Review of Evidence for Bromocriptine, Propranolol, and Baclofen.\",\"authors\":\"Justin P Reinert,&nbsp;Zsanett Kormanyos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225221132678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this review was to evaluate the clinical data supporting bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen in the pharmacologic management of central fever. <b>Data Sources:</b> A comprehensive literature review was performed between January 2018 and August 2022 using the following keywords: \\\"central fever\\\" NOT \\\"fever\\\" OR \\\"infection\\\" OR \\\"infectious\\\" AND \\\"neurocritical\\\" OR \\\"neurology\\\" AND \\\"treatment\\\" AND \\\"medication\\\" OR \\\"medicine\\\" OR \\\"drug\\\" OR \\\"pharmaceutical.\\\" <b>Study Selection and Data Extraction:</b> A total of 6 case reports met specified inclusion criteria, with 2 reporting on each of the evaluated medications. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> Significant heterogeneity exists regarding dosing strategies and duration of treatment with these medications for the management of central fever. Although each medication demonstrated the ability to restore normothermia, the variation in underlying cause of the fever and lack of cross-over evaluation between different medications makes a definitive treatment strategy for any of these agents elusive. <b>Conclusions:</b> The development of a central fever has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have suffered a critical neurologic injury. Although their exact mechanism for this indication has not been fully elucidated, anecdotal evidence seemingly supports the use of bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899958/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221132678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221132678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本综述旨在评估支持溴隐亭、普萘洛尔和巴氯芬在中枢性发热药物治疗中的临床数据。数据来源:在2018年1月至2022年8月期间,使用以下关键词进行了一项全面的文献综述:“中心性发热”非“发热”或“感染”或“传染性”与“神经危重症”或“神经病学”与“治疗”与“药物”或“药物”,每种评估药物有2份报告。数据综合:这些药物治疗中心性发热的给药策略和治疗时间存在显著的异质性。尽管每种药物都证明了恢复正常体温的能力,但发烧的根本原因的差异以及不同药物之间缺乏交叉评估,使得这些药物的最终治疗策略变得难以捉摸。结论:中枢性发热的发展与严重神经损伤患者的不良预后有关。尽管其确切的适应症机制尚未完全阐明,但传闻证据似乎支持使用溴隐亭、普萘洛尔和巴氯芬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever: A Review of Evidence for Bromocriptine, Propranolol, and Baclofen.

Objective: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the clinical data supporting bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen in the pharmacologic management of central fever. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was performed between January 2018 and August 2022 using the following keywords: "central fever" NOT "fever" OR "infection" OR "infectious" AND "neurocritical" OR "neurology" AND "treatment" AND "medication" OR "medicine" OR "drug" OR "pharmaceutical." Study Selection and Data Extraction: A total of 6 case reports met specified inclusion criteria, with 2 reporting on each of the evaluated medications. Data Synthesis: Significant heterogeneity exists regarding dosing strategies and duration of treatment with these medications for the management of central fever. Although each medication demonstrated the ability to restore normothermia, the variation in underlying cause of the fever and lack of cross-over evaluation between different medications makes a definitive treatment strategy for any of these agents elusive. Conclusions: The development of a central fever has been associated with poor outcomes in patients who have suffered a critical neurologic injury. Although their exact mechanism for this indication has not been fully elucidated, anecdotal evidence seemingly supports the use of bromocriptine, propranolol, and baclofen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Apixaban Use in Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease. Phenobarbital Dosing for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Review of the Literature. Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic Implementation of Virtual Interactive Cases for Pharmacy Education: A Single-Center Experience. The Role of Telepharmacy in the Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Services Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1