2分钟步试验:一种可靠有效的测量老年人冠状动脉血管重建术后功能能力的方法。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1002/pri.1984
Jaclyn Jie Ling Chow, Claire Fitzgerald, Sarah Rand
{"title":"2分钟步试验:一种可靠有效的测量老年人冠状动脉血管重建术后功能能力的方法。","authors":"Jaclyn Jie Ling Chow,&nbsp;Claire Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Sarah Rand","doi":"10.1002/pri.1984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise training is the central component in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR). A baseline assessment of aerobic capacity is paramount for exercise prescription and safety. The Two-Minute Step Test (2MST) has been used to measure aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. However, the reliability and validity of the 2MST in older adults post-coronary revascularisation (CRV) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in a single CR centre. Two 2MSTs and one six-minute walk test (6MWT) were completed in a single session. The 2MST measurements were recorded by two raters for each individual. The six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and 2MST steps recorded by both raters were analysed to determine the relationship and agreement between measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty one participants with a median (IQR) age of 66 (62,73) years old were included in the study post CRV. Strong positive correlations were found between steps achieved during the 2MSTs and the 6MWD (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, p < 0.0001). Excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated between raters during the 2MSTs (ICC = 0.999-1.000, p = 0.000). Excellent relative test-retest reliability was demonstrated in both 2MSTs recorded by both raters (ICC = 0.927-0.934, p = 0.000). However, absolute test-retest reliability may have been limited by a learning effect between repeated 2MSTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate that the 2MST may be used as an alternative to the 6MWT as an outcome measure for aerobic capacity in older adults post-CRV. However, a practice trial is recommended at baseline to account for a learning effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"28 2","pages":"e1984"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2 min step test: A reliable and valid measure of functional capacity in older adults post coronary revascularisation.\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn Jie Ling Chow,&nbsp;Claire Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Sarah Rand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise training is the central component in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR). A baseline assessment of aerobic capacity is paramount for exercise prescription and safety. The Two-Minute Step Test (2MST) has been used to measure aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. However, the reliability and validity of the 2MST in older adults post-coronary revascularisation (CRV) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in a single CR centre. Two 2MSTs and one six-minute walk test (6MWT) were completed in a single session. The 2MST measurements were recorded by two raters for each individual. The six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and 2MST steps recorded by both raters were analysed to determine the relationship and agreement between measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty one participants with a median (IQR) age of 66 (62,73) years old were included in the study post CRV. Strong positive correlations were found between steps achieved during the 2MSTs and the 6MWD (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, p < 0.0001). Excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated between raters during the 2MSTs (ICC = 0.999-1.000, p = 0.000). Excellent relative test-retest reliability was demonstrated in both 2MSTs recorded by both raters (ICC = 0.927-0.934, p = 0.000). However, absolute test-retest reliability may have been limited by a learning effect between repeated 2MSTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate that the 2MST may be used as an alternative to the 6MWT as an outcome measure for aerobic capacity in older adults post-CRV. However, a practice trial is recommended at baseline to account for a learning effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"e1984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:运动训练是心脏康复的核心组成部分。有氧能力的基线评估对运动处方和安全性至关重要。两分钟步数测试(2MST)已被用于测量健康老年人的有氧能力。然而,2MST在老年人冠状动脉血管重建术(CRV)后的可靠性和有效性尚不清楚。方法:在单个CR中心进行前瞻性观察研究。两个2mst和一个6分钟步行测试(6MWT)在一个会话中完成。每个个体的2MST测量值由两名评分员记录。对两名评分者记录的6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和2MST步数进行分析,以确定测量结果之间的关系和一致性。结果:31名中位(IQR)年龄为66(62,73)岁的受试者被纳入CRV后研究。在2MST和6MWD之间发现了很强的正相关(r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, p)。结论:本研究结果表明,2MST可以替代6MWT作为老年人crv后有氧能力的结果测量。然而,建议在基线上进行实践试验,以说明学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The 2 min step test: A reliable and valid measure of functional capacity in older adults post coronary revascularisation.

Purpose: Exercise training is the central component in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR). A baseline assessment of aerobic capacity is paramount for exercise prescription and safety. The Two-Minute Step Test (2MST) has been used to measure aerobic capacity in healthy older adults. However, the reliability and validity of the 2MST in older adults post-coronary revascularisation (CRV) is unknown.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in a single CR centre. Two 2MSTs and one six-minute walk test (6MWT) were completed in a single session. The 2MST measurements were recorded by two raters for each individual. The six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and 2MST steps recorded by both raters were analysed to determine the relationship and agreement between measurements.

Results: Thirty one participants with a median (IQR) age of 66 (62,73) years old were included in the study post CRV. Strong positive correlations were found between steps achieved during the 2MSTs and the 6MWD (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, p < 0.0001). Excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated between raters during the 2MSTs (ICC = 0.999-1.000, p = 0.000). Excellent relative test-retest reliability was demonstrated in both 2MSTs recorded by both raters (ICC = 0.927-0.934, p = 0.000). However, absolute test-retest reliability may have been limited by a learning effect between repeated 2MSTs.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the 2MST may be used as an alternative to the 6MWT as an outcome measure for aerobic capacity in older adults post-CRV. However, a practice trial is recommended at baseline to account for a learning effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1