糖尿病患者细菌感染并发症诊断能力的发展。

Q3 Medicine Review of Diabetic Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1900/RDS.2022.18.135
Samiah Hamad S Al-Mijalli, Ashwag Y Shami, Rasha A Al-Salem, Nawaf M Alnafisi
{"title":"糖尿病患者细菌感染并发症诊断能力的发展。","authors":"Samiah Hamad S Al-Mijalli,&nbsp;Ashwag Y Shami,&nbsp;Rasha A Al-Salem,&nbsp;Nawaf M Alnafisi","doi":"10.1900/RDS.2022.18.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> Our objective was to assess the pattern of urine infections, the most common pathogen, and their susceptibility pattern to antibiotics among Saudi diabetic patients. <b>METHODS:</b> We performed a year-long cross-sectional study from January 2018 to January 2019 at KAAU Hospital in Riyadh, KSA. We cultured the urine specimens obtained from diabetic patients based on optimal aerobic and anaerobic microbiological methods. By adopting standard microbiological methods, we identified the bacterial isolates. We also followed the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to do antibiotic susceptibility testing. <b>RESULTS:</b> A total of 100 isolates were evaluated, and a total of 22 organisms were isolated. The majority were multidrug-resistant organisms. <i>Streptococcus haemolyticus</i> was the most frequent organism and rated (15%). It was followed by <i>Staphylococcus hominis</i> (11%), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (9%), <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (9%), <i>Enterococcus fiseum</i> (7%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (7%), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (7%), <i>Staphylococcus lantus</i> (5%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (5%). We also found multi-microbial infections. Most of the organisms were susceptible to tigecycline, gentamycin, and nitrofurantoin, rating (88%), (84%) and (78%), respectively. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Our study revealed that a wide range of pathogens affects the diabetes patients. <i>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</i> is the most prevalent pathogen. We observed considerable antimicrobial resistance. Tigecycline had a wide sensitivity spectrum and was effective against most of the bacteria. Thus, it can be used as an empirical antibiotic.</p>","PeriodicalId":34965,"journal":{"name":"Review of Diabetic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044050/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Diagnostic Capabilities for Complications of Bacterial Infection in Diabetic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Samiah Hamad S Al-Mijalli,&nbsp;Ashwag Y Shami,&nbsp;Rasha A Al-Salem,&nbsp;Nawaf M Alnafisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1900/RDS.2022.18.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> Our objective was to assess the pattern of urine infections, the most common pathogen, and their susceptibility pattern to antibiotics among Saudi diabetic patients. <b>METHODS:</b> We performed a year-long cross-sectional study from January 2018 to January 2019 at KAAU Hospital in Riyadh, KSA. We cultured the urine specimens obtained from diabetic patients based on optimal aerobic and anaerobic microbiological methods. By adopting standard microbiological methods, we identified the bacterial isolates. We also followed the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to do antibiotic susceptibility testing. <b>RESULTS:</b> A total of 100 isolates were evaluated, and a total of 22 organisms were isolated. The majority were multidrug-resistant organisms. <i>Streptococcus haemolyticus</i> was the most frequent organism and rated (15%). It was followed by <i>Staphylococcus hominis</i> (11%), <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (9%), <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (9%), <i>Enterococcus fiseum</i> (7%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (7%), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (7%), <i>Staphylococcus lantus</i> (5%) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (5%). We also found multi-microbial infections. Most of the organisms were susceptible to tigecycline, gentamycin, and nitrofurantoin, rating (88%), (84%) and (78%), respectively. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Our study revealed that a wide range of pathogens affects the diabetes patients. <i>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</i> is the most prevalent pathogen. We observed considerable antimicrobial resistance. Tigecycline had a wide sensitivity spectrum and was effective against most of the bacteria. Thus, it can be used as an empirical antibiotic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Diabetic Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10044050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Diabetic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2022.18.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Diabetic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2022.18.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:我们的目的是评估沙特阿拉伯糖尿病患者尿液感染模式、最常见的病原体及其对抗生素的敏感性。方法:我们于2018年1月至2019年1月在沙特利雅得KAAU医院进行了为期一年的横断面研究。采用最佳好氧和厌氧微生物学方法对糖尿病患者尿液标本进行培养。采用标准微生物学方法对分离菌进行鉴定。我们还按照临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指导方针进行抗生素敏感性测试。结果:共鉴定100株分离菌,分离出22株微生物。大多数是耐多药菌。溶血链球菌是最常见的细菌,占15%。其次是人型葡萄球菌(11%)、铜绿假单胞菌(9%)、粪肠球菌(9%)、fiseum肠球菌(7%)、大肠杆菌(7%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(7%)、大葡萄球菌(5%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(5%)。我们还发现了多种微生物感染。大多数微生物对替加环素、庆大霉素和呋喃妥因敏感,分别为(88%)、(84%)和(78%)。结论:我们的研究揭示了影响糖尿病患者的多种病原体。溶血葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体。我们观察到相当大的抗菌素耐药性。替加环素具有广泛的敏感谱,对大多数细菌都有效。因此,它可以作为经验性抗生素使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of Diagnostic Capabilities for Complications of Bacterial Infection in Diabetic Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the pattern of urine infections, the most common pathogen, and their susceptibility pattern to antibiotics among Saudi diabetic patients. METHODS: We performed a year-long cross-sectional study from January 2018 to January 2019 at KAAU Hospital in Riyadh, KSA. We cultured the urine specimens obtained from diabetic patients based on optimal aerobic and anaerobic microbiological methods. By adopting standard microbiological methods, we identified the bacterial isolates. We also followed the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to do antibiotic susceptibility testing. RESULTS: A total of 100 isolates were evaluated, and a total of 22 organisms were isolated. The majority were multidrug-resistant organisms. Streptococcus haemolyticus was the most frequent organism and rated (15%). It was followed by Staphylococcus hominis (11%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9%), Enterococcus faecalis (9%), Enterococcus fiseum (7%), Escherichia coli (7%), Staphylococcus aureus (7%), Staphylococcus lantus (5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%). We also found multi-microbial infections. Most of the organisms were susceptible to tigecycline, gentamycin, and nitrofurantoin, rating (88%), (84%) and (78%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that a wide range of pathogens affects the diabetes patients. Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the most prevalent pathogen. We observed considerable antimicrobial resistance. Tigecycline had a wide sensitivity spectrum and was effective against most of the bacteria. Thus, it can be used as an empirical antibiotic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Diabetic Studies
Review of Diabetic Studies Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Review of Diabetic Studies (RDS) is the society"s peer-reviewed journal published quarterly. The purpose of The RDS is to support and encourage research in biomedical diabetes-related science including areas such as endocrinology, immunology, epidemiology, genetics, cell-based research, developmental research, bioengineering and disease management.
期刊最新文献
Suboptimal monitoring of glucose levels and poor glycaemic control is associated with increased mortality and length of stay in adult inpatients with diabetes in a tertiary New Zealand hospital Acute effects of the coffee diterpene cafestol on glucose metabolism in non-diabetic subjects with abdominal obesity Geographical variation in diabetes mellitus prevalence rates in Greece Metabolic and immune response to high-fat diet in healthy urban Indonesian males with family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus Health-Related Fitness of Adolescent Boys with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus After Recreational Football Exercise with Caloric Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1